Managed care for the elderly in the United States: outcomes to-date and potential for future growth

Health Policy ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. S145-S162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Doyle ◽  
Jean Masland
1998 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaori Imai

The demand for health care and social welfare services for the elderly has increased and in Japan, there is a need in the social system to improve the quality of life, especially for those who are disabled. This article directs attention to bed-ridden elderly persons from the standpoint of social problems attending economic development and population changes based on data from Japan, the United States, Sweden, and OECD countries. Compared to the United States, there are more bed-ridden elderly in Japan, and inadequate public resources for caring. Physicians, nurses, care workers, and rehabilitation specialists such as physiotherapist and occupational therapist per 1000 aged sixty-five or over are 89.5 in Japan while 237.4 in Sweden. Japan has the fewest such health and welfare personnel among developed countries. Even with increases in such personnel through the New Gold Plan, future increase in aged population would off-set the effect and the problem of providing care for the elderly remains.


1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 763-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morris L. Barer ◽  
Clyde Hertzman ◽  
Robert Miller ◽  
Marina V. Pascali

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (19) ◽  
pp. 1413-1414
Author(s):  
K. R. Yabroff ◽  
E. B. Lamont ◽  
J. L. Warren ◽  
M. L. Brown

2020 ◽  
pp. 002073142096394
Author(s):  
Lori Gonzalez

The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) has provided, for more than 4 decades, high-quality, cost-effective medical and social care to older people in the United States under nonprofit ownership. Recent rulings by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), however, will fundamentally change the initial intent and operation of the program. CMS’s final rule (4168-F) removes the provision that PACE operators be nonprofit. This article provides the legislative background for the final ruling and critiques the study that was used to justify the removal of the nonprofit provision. Although the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 listed a number of requirements for evaluating for-profit PACE programs, the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services did not follow them before establishing for-profit PACE sites as permanent providers. It also argues that the ruling was made without much evidence that for-profit compared to nonprofit operators can provide a similar level of quality of care, access, and cost-effectiveness and urges policymakers to increase regulatory accountability, given what we know about other shifts in profit status and health care.


2021 ◽  
pp. 150-156
Author(s):  
Richard Schweid

This chapter highlights the need for public policy to change how we value the work of home health aides (HHAs). Communities continue to relegate the work that HHAs do to the category of menial labor, when in fact it is something much more important and difficult to do well, more a profession than unskilled labor. In 2019, the number of HHAs for elderly Americans fell far short of those needed in many locales. Mean-spirited, xenophobic immigration policies may soon further reduce the numbers of people who are available to care for the elderly. Without enough people to do this work, the United States will move deeper into a second-rate nationhood. If there are not enough aides to go around, private-pay care will grow more expensive, and public long-term care at home will be reduced or eliminated for many, while wait times to receive what care is left will increase. Ultimately, people's lives will be of less quality than they might have been, and they may die sooner than necessary. The chapter then outlines a number of specific plans which have been elaborated to show how a better system of home health care might be funded in the United States.


2019 ◽  
pp. 491-506
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Corcoran ◽  
Sarah LaFave ◽  
Denny Fe Garcia Agana ◽  
Haleigh Kampman ◽  
John C. Penner ◽  
...  

This chapter presents a number of personal perspectives on experiences and thoughts on collaborative population health projects that have taken place. It presents a number of essays that look at slightly different aspects of the topic. The first essay focuses on the team of professionals who are involved in such projects. The second essay looks at care for the elderly. The third essay gives a very personal account of hopes to make a difference in population health. The next essay looks at employment and public health. The fifth essay is about food insecurity. The essay that follows looks at the role of the pharmacist. The seventh essay considers interdisciplinary collaboration for improving health in the United States.


1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-276
Author(s):  
Mary Hoyte Sizemore

The issue of access to health care for the elderly and the quality of that care is of growing importance not only in the United States but also in less developed nations such as Mexico. An area of special interest is the U.S.-Mexico border region, where an increasing number of people are relocating to seek jobs they believe will open up as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) loosens trade barriers. Workers flocking to the border often bring their families, including elderly relatives. This study examines a sample of lower-middle and mid-middle class Mexicans aged sixty to eighty-nine who reside in the border city of Ciudad Juárez, focusing on the principal ailments which affect these individuals and available treatment. A concluding section makes brief comparative remarks on access to health care for the elderly in Mexico and in the United States.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document