30-day mortality following initiation of immunotherapy for advanced stage lung cancer

Lung Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. S34 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.S. Evans ◽  
R. Kitson ◽  
R. Shah ◽  
S. Li ◽  
S. Ghosh ◽  
...  
BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett C. Bade ◽  
Geliang Gan ◽  
Fangyong Li ◽  
Lingeng Lu ◽  
Lynn Tanoue ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lung cancer survivors need more options to improve quality of life (QoL). It is unclear to what extent patients with advanced stage disease are willing to participate in home-based physical activity (PA) and if these interventions improve QoL. The goal of our study was to determine interest in participating in our 3-month home-based walking regimen in patients with advanced stage lung cancer. We used a randomized design to evaluate for potential benefit in PA and patient-reported outcomes. Methods We performed an open-label, 1:1 randomized trial in 40 patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evaluating enrollment rate, PA, QoL, dyspnea, depression, and biomarkers. Compared to usual care (UC), the intervention group (IG) received an accelerometer, in-person teaching session, and gain-framed text messages for 12 weeks. Results We enrolled 56% (40/71) of eligible patients. Participants were on average 65 years and enrolled 1.9 years from diagnosis. Most patients were women (75%), and receiving treatment (85%) for stage IV (73%) adenocarcinoma (83%). A minority of patients were employed part-time or full time (38%). Both groups reported low baseline PA (IG mean 37 (Standard deviation (SD) 46) vs UC 59 (SD 56) minutes/week; p = 0.25). The IG increased PA more than UC (mean change IG + 123 (SD 212) vs UC + 35 (SD 103) minutes/week; p = 0.051)). Step count in the IG was not statistically different between baseline (4707 step/day), week 6 (5605; p = 0.16), and week 12 (4606 steps/day; p = 0.87). The intervention improved EORTC role functioning domain (17 points; p = 0.022) with borderline improvement in dyspnea (− 13 points; p = 0.051) compared to UC. In patients with two blood samples (25%), we observed a significant increase in soluble PD-1 (219.8 (SD 54.5) pg/mL; p < 0.001). Conclusions Our pilot trial using a 3-month, home-based, mobile health intervention enrolled over half of eligible patients with stage III and IV NSCLC. The intervention increased PA, and may improve several aspects of QoL. We also identified potential biomarker changes relevant to lung cancer biology. Future research should use a larger sample to examine the effect of exercise on cancer biomarkers, which may mediate the association between PA and QoL. Clinical trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03352245).


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 507-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C.L. Lam ◽  
Terence C.C. Tam ◽  
Kenneth M.K. Lau ◽  
Wai-Mui Wong ◽  
Christopher K.M. Hui ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 1251-1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Kypriotakis ◽  
Linda E. Francis ◽  
Elizabeth O’Toole ◽  
Tanyanika Phillips Towe ◽  
Julia Hannum Rose

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19157-e19157
Author(s):  
Anders Mellemgaard ◽  
Philomena Bredin ◽  
Maria Iachina ◽  
Anders Green ◽  
Mark Krasnik ◽  
...  

e19157 Background: Comorbidity may influence prognosis in lung cancer, affect performance status (PS) of patients as well as complicate treatment. The present study examines usage and outcome of chemotherapy (CT) for advanced-stage lung cancer, and focuses on the role of comorbidity. Methods: Patients with advanced-stage lung cancer were identified in the Danish Lung Cancer Registry. A total of 22,999 patients with non-resectable, advanced-stage lung cancer were identified. Data on stage, PS, Charlson comorbidity score (ChS), age, histology and type of first treatment (if any) were avaliable. First treatment was categorized as chemotherapy (n=7,346), chemo-radiotherapy (2,636), radiotherapy (n=4,155) or no therapy (n=8,862). Survival was examined separately for 0-1 year and 1-5 years, and further distinction was made between metastatic and non-metastatic lung cancer. Data are presented for the subgroup of patients receiving chemotherapy as first treatment only. All estimates are derived from logistic regression model adjusting for the effect of performance status, pulmonary function and histological type, except for usage where models included same variables plus stage. Results: Use of chemotherapy was less frequent for more comorbid patients (OR 0.86, 0.64, 0.56 for Charlson score 1, 2, 3+ respectively compared to no comorbidity). Older patients and men were less likely to receive CT. For patients receiving CT as first treatment for non-metastatic lung cancer, survival in the first year was slightly worse for those with co-morbidity (HR 0-1year, non metastatic =0.91, 0.92, 0.87 for ChS 1,2,3+ respectively). For 1-5years and for metastatic lung cancer no correlation between comorbidity and survival was noted. In contrast, PS and sex was strongly associated with survival. Conclusions: With increasing co morbidity, chemotherapy was used less often. Comorbidity is not an important prognostic factor in advanced lung cancer treated with chemotherapy. However, sex and especially performance status remain as strong prognostic factors in this patient group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document