A Slowly Evolving Brachial Plexus Injury Following a Proximal Humeral Fracture in a Child

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. DREW ◽  
G. E. B. GIDDINS ◽  
R. BIRCH
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fracture ◽  
Brachial Plexus Injury ◽  
Humeral Fracture ◽  
Rare Occurrence ◽  
Initial Fracture ◽  
Neurological Injuries ◽  
Delays In Diagnosis ◽  
Limb Fractures ◽  
Upper Limb Fractures

The association of fractures and neurological injuries is well recognized, especially with certain upper limb fractures. Typically, the nerve injury occurs at the time of initial fracture displacement. A case is reported of an unusual combination of fracture and nerve injury in a child, with the extremely rare occurrence of a slowly evolving nerve injury. The potential for delayed nerve injury following a fracture needs to be appreciated to prevent delays in diagnosis and treatment.

scholarly journals Axillary arterial entrapment and brachial plexus injury due to proximal humeral fracture

Injury Extra ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 67-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denada Sharra Palm ◽  
Priti P. Parikh ◽  
Brandi Schoonover ◽  
Damian Lebamoff ◽  
Mary C. McCarthy
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fracture ◽  
Brachial Plexus Injury ◽  
Humeral Fracture

Arthroscopically treated proximal humeral fracture malunion

2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1020-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor Hinov ◽  
Franklin Wilson ◽  
Gayl Adams
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Humeral Fracture ◽  
Humeral Fracture

scholarly journals FRI0617-HPR GRADED MOTOR IMAGERY IN POSTTRAUMATIC STIFFNESS OF THE ELBOW: A PILOT STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 913.2-914
Author(s):  
T. Birinci ◽  
E. Kaya Mutlu ◽  
S. Altun
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Motor Imagery ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Elbow Fracture ◽  
Stiff Elbow ◽  
Limb Fractures ◽  
Upper Limb Fractures ◽  
Graded Motor Imagery

Background:Elbow fracture is treated either conservatively or surgically followed by a period of immobilization with casting or splinting. A splint used to immobilize upper limbs for many weeks results in changes in both the peripheral musculature and the central nervous system. It is well known that common complaints after upper limb fractures include weakness, pain, and stiffness; therefore, pain management is important in the early stages of the rehabilitation of upper limb fractures.Objectives:This pilot study aimed to investigate the efficacy of graded motor imaginary (GMI) on pain, range of motion (ROM), and function in patients with posttraumatic stiff elbow.Methods:Fourteen patients with posttraumatic stiff elbow (6 women, mean age: 45.42 ± 11.26 years, mean body mass index: 24.29 ± 3.38 kg\m2and mean duration of immobilization: 4.75 ± 1.03 weeks) were randomly allocated to either GMI or control groups. The GMI group received GMI treatment in addition to a structured exercise program, and the control group received a structured exercise program (two days per week for six weeks) (Figure 1). The assessments included pain at rest and during activity using the visual analog scale (VAS), elbow active ROM with a digital goniometer (Baseline Evaluation Instrument, Fabrication Enterprises, Inc., White Plains, NY), and upper extremity functional status using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). The assessments were performed at baseline and after the 6-week intervention.Figure 1.Graded motor imagery performed with mirror boxResults:After the 6-week intervention, there was a significant increase in elbow flexion-extension ROM and supination-pronation ROM, and improvement in DASH score in both groups (p<0.05). However, improvement in VAS-rest and VAS-activity was significantly higher in the GMI group than the control group (p=0.03 and p=0.01, respectively).Conclusion:A conservative treatment program consisting of GMI treatment in addition to a structured exercise program applied twice a week for 6 weeks, has been found more effective in decreasing pain in the posttraumatic stiff elbow. It could be concluded that GMI is an effective treatment method for elbow fracture in patients with predominant elbow pain.References:[1] Harris JE, Hebert A. Utilization of motor imagery in upper limb rehabilitation: a systematic scoping review. Clin Rehab. 2015:29(11):1092-1107.[2] Opie GM, Evans A, Ridding MC, Semmler JG. Short-term immobilization influences use-dependent cortical plasticity and fine motor performance. Neuroscience. 2016:330:247-256.[3] Birinci T, Razak Ozdincler A, Altun S, Kural C. A structured exercise programme combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching or static stretching in posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehab. 2019:33(2):241-252.Acknowledgments:The present work was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa (Project No: TDK-2019-33997).Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Comparability of Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Clinical Assessment Tools for Shoulder Function in Patients with Proximal Humeral Fracture

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elke Maurer ◽  
Christian Bahrs ◽  
Luise Kühle ◽  
Patrick Ziegler ◽  
Christoph Gonser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strong Correlation ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fracture ◽  
Humeral Fracture ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Scoring Tools

Abstract Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are gaining increasing importance in the context of quality management. Different PROMs and scoring tools are available to assess shoulder function after proximal humeral fracture (PHFx). In Europe, these include the Constant-Murley Score (CS), Neer Score (NS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), University of California at Los Angeles Score (UCLA) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hands Score (DASH). In addition, the health-related quality of life can be assessed by the PROMs Short Form 36 (SF-36) and EuroQol (EQ-5D). Although all these test instruments assess shoulder function, the components to be answered objectively and subjectively vary and thus the possibility of independent assessment. The aim of the present study is to compare the correlation between the results of the different PROMs and the clinical screening tools in patients with PHFx. Methods 76 patients who were treated with angular stable plate osteosynthesis for a proximal humeral fracture between 01/2001 and 12/2005 were included in this trial. The outcome was measured with PROMs or clinical scoring tools such as CS, NS, OSS, UCLA, DASH, SF-36 and EQ-5D and a correlation coefficient between those evaluation tools was calculated. In addition, a distinction was made between the two force measurement methods (wrist [HG] vs. deltoid muscle [DM]) for CS. Results The correlation of the results of CS and NS (HG: r = 0.85; p < 0.001/DM: r = 0.93; p < 0.001), CS and UCLA (HG: r = 0.83; p < 0.001/DM: r = 0.86; p < 0.001), NS and UCLA (r = 0.91; p < 0.001) as well as DASH and OSS (r = 0.88; p < 0.001) was strongly expressed. A good comparability of the results was demonstrated between CS and OSS (HG: r = 0.63; p < 0.001/DM: r = 0.66; p < 0.001) and between CS and DASH (HG: r = 0.62; p < 0.001/DM: r = 0.61; p < 0.001). The correlation of CS (HG/DM) and UCLA with the EQ-5D index was also good. Assessment of the physical components of SF-36 with CS, NS, OSS, UCLA and DASH showed a moderate to good association, while the mental components of SF-36 showed a low correlation (p > 0.05). Conclusion The assessment of shoulder function after proximal humerus fracture showed a very strong correlation within the clinical questionnaires (CS/NS/UCLA) and the PROMs (OSS/DASH). A strong correlation also exists between the clinical questionnaires and the PROMs. There was only a moderate correlation with the EQ-5D. The moderate to strong correlation between the physical components of SF-36, with almost no correlation between the mental components of SF-36, indicates that the quality of life restriction is based on a physical, but not on a mental impairment.

scholarly journals A youngest reported case of type II Monteggia lesion associated with a posterior ulnohumeral dislocation

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-25
Author(s):  
Avadhoot Kantak
Keyword(s):  
Upper Limb ◽  
Injury Pattern ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Rare Injury ◽  
Monteggia Lesion ◽  
Injury Mechanisms ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Limb Fractures ◽  
Upper Limb Fractures

Monteggia fractures are uncommon injuries, despite a high incidence of upper limb fractures in teenage children. We describe a case of a type 2 Monteggia variant in an adolescent. This injury pattern consisted of ulnohumeral dislocation in combination with type 2 Monteggia lesion. We discuss the possible injury mechanisms of this rare injury and review available literature.

scholarly journals Prognosis of proximal humeral fracture.

1990 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 835-838
Author(s):  
Mako Hirano ◽  
Kazutoshi Nomura ◽  
Meisho So ◽  
Toshio Amano
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Humeral Fracture ◽  
Humeral Fracture

Five-year outcome after conversion of a hemiarthroplasty when used for the treatment of a proximal humeral fracture to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (6) ◽  
pp. 761-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Holschen ◽  
M-K. Siemes ◽  
K-A. Witt ◽  
J. Steinbeck
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fracture ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Humeral Fracture ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Aims The reasons for failure of a hemirthroplasty (HA) when used to treat a proximal humeral fracture include displaced or necrotic tuberosities, insufficient metaphyseal bone-stock, and rotator cuff tears. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is often the only remaining form of treatment in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome after conversions from a failed HA to rTSA. Material and Methods A total of 35 patients, in whom a HA, as treatment for a fracture of the proximal humerus, had failed, underwent conversion to a rTSA. A total of 28 were available for follow-up at a mean of 61 months (37 to 91), having been initially reviewed at a mean of 20 months (12 to 36) postoperatively. Having a convertible design, the humeral stem could be preserved in nine patients. The stem was removed in the other 19 patients and a conventional rTSA was implanted. At final follow-up, patients were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Constant Score, and plain radiographs. Results At final follow-up, the mean ASES was 59 (25 to 97) and the mean adjusted Constant Score was 63% (23% to 109%). Both improved significantly (p < 0.001). The mean forward flexion was 104° (50° to 155°) and mean abduction was 98° (60° to 140°). Nine patients (32%) had a complication; two had an infection and instability, respectively; three had a scapular fracture; and one patient each had delayed wound healing and symptomatic loosening. If implants could be converted to a rTSA without removal of the stem, the operating time was shorter (82 minutes versus 102 minutes; p = 0.018). Conclusion After failure of a HA in the treatment of a proximal humeral fracture, conversion to a rTSA may achieve pain relief and improved shoulder function. The complication rate is considerable. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:761–6.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document