Psychological Aspects of Hand Injuries their Treatment and Rehabilitation

1985 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-287
Author(s):  
JULIA B. HAESE

Psychological factors related to the treatment and rehabilitation of hand-injured patients were identified by interviewing of thirty patients under treatment. Findings were compared with those reported in the literature. Concern for inactivity, desire to return to work, and effort toward recovery were identified as significantly common factors; pain and fear of disfigurement were not. Patients perceived themselves as making the greatest effort toward recovery but not that this was the most important factor in the recovery process. Responsibility varied significantly among the early, middle, and final phases of treatment. The results of the investigation were discussed in relation to hand-rehabilitation and implications for counselling and occupational therapy.

1972 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saul V. Levine ◽  
David D. Lloyd ◽  
William H. Longdon

Two hundred and eighteen chronic amphetamine users, ranging in age from thirteen to thirty years were interviewed to ascertain if common factors in backgrounds, life styles, and personalities exist. They were divided into six groups based on locale and sex, and important differences were noted. This essentially middle-class phenomenon is extremely destructive to these young people but it was quite obvious that the socio-psychological disturbance in most of them pre-dated the heavy drug use.


2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Gustafsson ◽  
G Lundh ◽  
P Svedberg ◽  
J Linder ◽  
K Alexanderson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S246-S246
Author(s):  
Katherine J Choi ◽  
Christopher H Pham ◽  
Zachary J Collier ◽  
John Carney ◽  
Dawn Kurakazu ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Hands are the most commonly burned body part, and are prone to developing limited range of motion and scar contractures, which benefit from aggressive occupational therapy (OT). Many burn survivors are vulnerable with limited resources and poor follow up. The purpose of this study is to determine outpatient OT referral and compliance rates in our patient population. Methods All patients with hand burns admitted to a single ABA verified burn center from January 2015 to May 2016 were reviewed. Demographics (living situation, substance use, psychiatric illness), TBSA, interventions (type/number of surgeries), outcomes (length of stay [LOS]), and OT outcomes (inpatient and outpatient treatment, reason for discontinuation) were evaluated. Results Sixty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 33±18 years. In terms of living situation, 17% (n=10) were homeless, and 3% (n=2) were incarcerated. A documented history of alcohol abuse was present in 13% (n=8), 23% (n=14) had positive urine toxicology screens, and 15% (n=9) had diagnosed psychiatric illness. Mean TBSA was 10%±6. Half (N=30, 51%) were managed non-operatively. At discharge, 30% (n=18) had normal hand function and did not meet criteria for outpatient hand therapy. Over 70% (n=43) received outpatient referrals, but only 44% (n=19) of those referred reliably returned for outpatient OT. Despite having outpatient OT referrals, 33% (n=14) did not present to outpatient therapy after repeats attempts of contact, and 67% (n=29) of those with referrals only came to one visit. Of those that did not complete therapy, most (n=14, 58%) were lost to follow up and unable to be contacted. Other reasons for not completing therapy within our system were out-of-network insurances requiring follow-up outside our hospital (36%) and incarceration (6%). Conclusions At our center, nearly 1 in 3 patients with hand burns had excellent function upon discharge and did not require outpatient therapy. However, when patients are referred for outpatient therapy, many do not show up or maintain reliable compliance. Many patients are simply lost to follow up. Applicability of Research to Practice While occupational therapy remains an effective and viable option for hand rehabilitation, further efforts must be aimed at providing patients mechanisms and education for achieving reliable outpatient follow up.


1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. O’SULLIVAN ◽  
J. COLVILLE

The socio-economic effect of 156 hand injuries was studied prospectively. The average cost per injury was IR£474. 28 of the more serious injuries utilized two-thirds of the resources and resulted in 83% of the days lost from work. In the working population approximately 50% of hand injuries occurred at work. In assessing the economic impact of hand injuries, labour costs account for 55 to 65% of costs. Amputation and complicated laceration were the most costly and resulted in more days lost at work. Injuries at work result in greater costs because they involve more serious injuries, and because workers requiring manual skills need a higher level of hand rehabilitation to return to work. Unless the labour costs are taken into account, the true impact of hand injuries is greatly underestimated.


2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 6911510128p1
Author(s):  
Peter Hershey ◽  
Donna Breger Stanton ◽  
Andrea Tiedgen ◽  
M. J. Mulcahey ◽  
Danielle Lesher

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huguette A. M. Désiron ◽  
Peter Donceel ◽  
Angelique de Rijk ◽  
Elke Van Hoof

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document