Apolipoprotein E4 accelerates dementia and increases cerebrospinal fluid tau levels in Alzheimer's disease

1999 ◽  
Vol 267 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuyasu Kanai ◽  
Masami Shizuka ◽  
Katsuya Urakami ◽  
Etsuro Matsubara ◽  
Yasuo Harigaya ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 223-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Lodeiro ◽  
Clara Ibáñez ◽  
Alejandro Cifuentes ◽  
Carolina Simó ◽  
Ángel Cedazo-Mínguez

1997 ◽  
Vol 225 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidonie Golombowski ◽  
Franz Müller-Spahn ◽  
Helmut Romig ◽  
Klaus Mendla ◽  
Christoph Hock

HAPS Educator ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43
Author(s):  
Brie Paddock ◽  
Kimberly Canfield ◽  
Sarah Cooper

2021 ◽  
pp. 174077452110344
Author(s):  
Michelle M Nuño ◽  
Joshua D Grill ◽  
Daniel L Gillen ◽  

Background/Aims: The focus of Alzheimer’s disease studies has shifted to earlier disease stages, including mild cognitive impairment. Biomarker inclusion criteria are often incorporated into mild cognitive impairment clinical trials to identify individuals with “prodromal Alzheimer’s disease” to ensure appropriate drug targets and enrich for participants likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease dementia. The use of these eligibility criteria may affect study power. Methods: We investigated outcome variability and study power in the setting of proof-of-concept prodromal Alzheimer’s disease trials that incorporate cerebrospinal fluid levels of total tau (t-tau) and phosphorylated (p-tau) as primary outcomes and how differing biomarker inclusion criteria affect power. We used data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative to model trial scenarios and to estimate the variance and within-subject correlation of total and phosphorylated tau. These estimates were then used to investigate the differences in study power for trials considering these two surrogate outcomes. Results: Patient characteristics were similar for all eligibility criteria. The lowest outcome variance and highest within-subject correlation were obtained when phosphorylated tau was used as an eligibility criterion, compared to amyloid beta or total tau, regardless of whether total tau or phosphorylated tau were used as primary outcomes. Power increased when eligibility criteria were broadened to allow for enrollment of subjects with either low amyloid beta or high phosphorylated tau. Conclusion: Specific biomarker inclusion criteria may impact statistical power in trials using total tau or phosphorylated tau as the primary outcome. In concert with other important considerations such as treatment target and population of clinical interest, these results may have implications to the integrity and efficiency of prodromal Alzheimer’s disease trial designs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document