162 The influence of a family history of breast cancer on the risk of developing a contralateral primary: A longterm follow up study

Author(s):  
I.H. Kunkler ◽  
W.J.L. Jack ◽  
G.R. Kerr
2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (12) ◽  
pp. 3462-3473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Marini ◽  
Milena Ruffino ◽  
Maria Enrica Sali ◽  
Massimo Molteni

Purpose This follow-up study assessed (a) the influence of phonological working memory (pWM), home literacy environment, and a family history of linguistic impairments in late talkers (LTs); (b) the diagnostic accuracy of a task of nonword repetition (NWR) in identifying LTs; and (c) the persistence of lexical weaknesses after 10 months. Method Two hundred ninety-three children were assessed at approximately 32 (t1) and 41 (t2) months. At t1, they were administered the Italian adaptation of the Language Development Survey, an NWR task (used to assess pWM), and questionnaires assessing home literacy environment and family history of language impairments. Thirty-three LTs were identified. The linguistic skills of the participants were evaluated at t2 by administering tasks assessing Articulation, Naming, Semantic Fluency, and Lexical Comprehension. Results At t2, LTs performed more poorly as compared with age-matched typically developing peers in articulatory and naming skills, had reduced lexical comprehension abilities, and had limited lexical knowledge. Their performance on the NWR task at t1 correlated with the extension of their vocabularies at t2 (as estimated with a Semantic Fluency task). Conclusions The Language Development Survey recently adapted to Italian is sensitive to LTs. Former LTs still have a mild lexical delay at approximately 40 months. As an indirect measure of pWM, the task of NWR is an early indicator of future lexical deficits.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Uyen T Lam ◽  
Stacey Knight ◽  
Tami L Bair ◽  
Viet T Le ◽  
Joseph B Muhlestein ◽  
...  

Introduction: Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are a mainstay in treating hypertension (HTN). Recently, Li et-al published a population based case-control study (JAMA 2013; 289:2354) reporting CCB use to be associated with incident breast cancer (odds ratio 2.6). We prospectively analyzed 2 Intermountain Healthcare (IHC) databases (db) to confirm or refute this provocative report. Methods: Two separate analyses were conducted using general patients (GP) seen at IHC and patients undergoing coronary angiography (CV) at IHC facilities. Subjects were females aged 50-70 with no history of breast cancer. Those prescribed CCB were matched 1:1 to subjects not on CCB based on age, race, tobacco, alcohol, body mass index, HTN and follow up time. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used for the primary analysis of time to incident breast cancer by CCB use adjusting for history of other cancers and family history of breast cancer. Results: A total of 2612 GP subjects (cases/controls) and 1106 CV subjects (cases/controls) were studied. In the GP db, there was a statistically significant increased risk of breast cancer for subjects using CCB (HR=1.58; 95% CI: 1.10-2.26). Risk was also associated with a positive family history (HR=2.79; 1.96-3.97) and a personal history of cancer (HR=1.87; 1.07-3.26). Breast cancer predominantly developed in <5 y of follow up (64% of cases). However, a reverse relationship was found in the CV db, where the HR was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.27-0.97). This observation was found despite consistent associations with several secondary outcomes, including for incident diabetes, coronary and renal disease. Conclusion: A modest association between CCB use and incident breast cancer was observed in the GP db, but results were not reproducible in the CV db. Given lack of a credible mechanism and failure of previous randomized CCB studies to detect a signal, we interpret these modest and conflicting associations to likely represent uncorrected confounding, e.g. prescriber bias or drug interactions. Similarly, we believe the results of Li et-al may represent confounding. Given the important role of CCBs in clinical medicine, further studies are warranted, including randomized trials to assess CCB safety with respect to breast cancer risk.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao-Sheng Ran ◽  
Yunyu Xiao ◽  
Xinyi Zhao ◽  
Tian-Ming Zhang ◽  
Yue-Hui Yu ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2180-2186 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Sundquist ◽  
J. Sundquist ◽  
P. J. Svensson ◽  
B. Zöller ◽  
A. A. Memon

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13062-e13062
Author(s):  
Tamar Safra ◽  
Barliz Waissengrin ◽  
Deanna Gerber ◽  
Rinat Bernstein Molho ◽  
Amnon Amit ◽  
...  

e13062 Background: To confirm data from older studies reporting reduced risks of breast cancer (BC) in BRCA mutated (BRCA+) ovarian cancer (OC) patients and to re-evaluate BC surveillance and/or prophylactic mastectomy in OC patients. Methods: Data on 430 BRCA+ mutation carriers diagnosed with OC between 2000 and 2017 in 6 medical centers (one in the USA and five in Israel) were analyzed. Data included demographics, breast surveillance type, family history, BRCA mutation types, timing of BC diagnosis (before or after OC diagnosis) and family history of cancer. Results: Median age at diagnosis of OC was 55.4 years (range, 31.3-90) and median follow-up was 4.6 years. Most patients were BRCA1 (66.6%), and 35.7% had 185delAG. Most patients (68.4%) were Ashkenazi Jews, 27.4% had a family history of BC and 16.5% were diagnosed with BC before OC. Five percent developed BC following OC diagnosis with a median time to BC diagnosis of 68 months (range, 11-210). Of those diagnosed with BC, 50% had triple-negative BC, 40% had luminal B ER+, PR-, Her2-neg and 10% had luminal A -ER+, PR+, her2-neg. There was a non-significant increase in BC after OC, and in BC prior to OC diagnosis; there was no correlation of BC with family history. No definite deaths from BC were recorded. Conclusions: The incidence of BC after OC diagnosis in the BRCA+ population at a median follow-up of 4.6 years is consistent with prior series. Prophylactic bilateral Surveillance measures should be re-evaluated in this population and may only be needed in long-term disease-free survivors and/or subpopulations to be identified. Clinical trial information: 07-146.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document