The continuing emergency care clinic: Improving patient compliance with follow-up care

1977 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 251-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A.H. Anwar ◽  
James R. Roberts ◽  
David K. Wagner
F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 357
Author(s):  
Lilian Vloet ◽  
Daniël Winterink ◽  
Aico Gerritsen ◽  
Wim Heutz ◽  
Thijs van Zonneveld ◽  
...  

Background The aim of this study was to compare the ambulance care process, follow-up care and patient experience between physician assistants and ambulance nurses operating as solo ambulance care providers, for a non-conveyed patient population. Methods An observational design was used. Characteristics of patients and events and the care process were retrieved from the ambulance registration database. Data on follow-up care and patient experience were collected through questionnaires. Results Of the included solo ambulance events, 49/379 (12.9%) were performed by physician assistants, 330/379 (87.1%) were performed by ambulance nurses. For initial complaints and the on-scene diagnoses there were no significant differences between the physician assistants and ambulance nurses. 90/165 (54.5%) of the patients requested follow-up care after being non-conveyed with no significant association between the PA and ambulance nurse group (p=.293). For type of follow-up care, 91.9% of the follow-up emergency care requests in this study came from patients treated by an ambulance nurse. There were no significant differences in patients’ experience for clinician attitude and behavior, treatment, and communication between physician assistants and ambulance nurses, although pain management and explanation about the non-conveyance decision could be improved Conclusions Besides small statistical but not clinically significant differences, this study indicated comparable solo ambulance care provided by a physician assistant or an ambulance nurse concerning the care process, follow-up care and patient experience. Patients treated by physician assistants seek less follow-up emergency care after non-conveyance, compared to ambulance nurses. Overall, patients experienced good attitude and behavior, treatment, and communication of the solo ambulance professional. Future well powered studies to gain insight in effects of PAs in ambulance care are needed, as well as studies in which PAs apply all additional skills they are licensed to.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 287-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Silvia

Treatment of mental illnesses has slowly shifted to primary care settings over the past decade. As more patients are identified as needing treatment for a mental illness, the availability of behavioral health (BH) practitioners has become more strained, leading to this shift towards primary care treatment. With more patients receiving psychiatric health care from their primary care providers (PCP), a need for dedicated BH practitioners within the primary care setting was developed. This article describes a novel program where a clinical psychiatric pharmacist is utilized as the primary psychiatric provider within an integrated BH program of a busy primary care clinic in a major metropolitan area. Working under a collaborative practice agreement to prescribe, the pharmacist acts as the initial BH contact for the clinic, as well as a liaison between primary care and BH. Patients referred to the pharmacist from primary care are then evaluated and appropriate medication prescribed for their illness. Most patients are followed prospectively by the pharmacist, with more complex patients (i.e., those not appropriate for primary care-based BH treatment) referred to the BH clinic for follow-up care. The pharmacist serves on the intake committee for the BH clinic, and facilitates patient referrals to their clinicians. Preliminary analysis of the program's effectiveness shows positive results. Within the first two months of the program, 28 patients were referred to the pharmacist (including five referred by BH clinic therapists through primary care). Most patients were referred for depression or anxiety, with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, substance abuse, bipolar disorder, and psychosis also being treated. As such, antidepressants and anxiolytics were the most common agents prescribed, but most every class of psychotherapeutic agents was utilized. Patient wait times to meet with the pharmacist were generally less than a week, with exceptions being found for patients already being prescribed a psychotherapeutic agent by their PCP and being referred to the pharmacist for follow-up care, or for patients being referred by their existing therapist. Initial reviews of the program by patients, primary care staff, and BH staff have been positive, especially in regards to patient access to specialized BH services.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taina Kankaala ◽  
Heikki Laine ◽  
Marja-Liisa Laitala ◽  
Päivi Rajavaara ◽  
Hannu Vähänikkilä ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Dental fear may lead to avoidance of regular dental treatment. The scope of this long-term practe-based study was to monitor the dental attendance of patients who received chair-side dental and fear treatment. Methods In 2000–2006, patients in the City of Oulu, Finland, received treatment for dental fear in the Clinic for Fearful Dental Patients (CFDP) from primary health care dentists trained on this subject. Of the originally treated patients (n = 163), 152 (93%) with sufficient information in dental records made up the study population. Information on their age and sex was available. The number of dental examinations, emergency visits and missed appointments was collected covering the follow-up period of 10 years 2006–2016. For analyses, data were dichotomized according to age at baseline and preliminary outcome baseline condition of dental fear treatment evaluated in 2006. To investigate association further, Poisson regression as well as binary logistic regression models were conducted. As register keeper, the City of Oulu gave permission for this retrospective data-based study. Results Patients receiving dental fear treatment at younger age (2–10 y) had significantly more dental examinations than those treated at > 10 years. Preliminary success was associated with the number of examinations, but not with emergency visits and missed appointments. Sex was not a significant factor in later dental attendance. There was an association between few dental examinations and dental emergency care need with unsuccessful baseline outcome of dental fear treatment. Conclusions Successful dental fear treatment especially at an early age is beneficial for future dental attendance measured by the number of examinations and consequently, less need for emergency care than in the opposite case. Successful fear treatment has positive impact on later dental care and regular dental attendance.


2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
BRUCE K. DIXON
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
S Wojcinski ◽  
A Farrokh ◽  
U Hille ◽  
E Hirschauer ◽  
W Schmidt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document