The Autogenous Vaccine Treatment of Interdigital Abscess

1926 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-36
Author(s):  
Harold Stainton ◽  
A. Compton
1979 ◽  
Vol 89 (Part 1) ◽  
pp. 1689???1696 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHARLENE B. STEPHENS ◽  
GODFREY E. ARNOLD ◽  
GREGORY M. BUTCHKO ◽  
CHERYL L. HARDY

1979 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. 1689-1696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlene B. Stephens ◽  
Godfrey E. Arnold ◽  
Cheryl L. Hardy ◽  
Gregory M. Butchko

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4281
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Amanatidis ◽  
Ifigeneia Mylona ◽  
Irene (Eirini) Kamenidou ◽  
Spyridon Mamalis ◽  
Aikaterini Stavrianea

Instagram is perhaps the most rapidly gaining in popularity of photo and video sharing social networking applications. It has been widely adopted by both end-users and organizations, posting their personal experiences or expressing their opinion during significant events and periods of crises, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the search for effective vaccine treatment. We identify the three major companies involved in vaccine research and extract their Instagram posts, after vaccination has started, as well as users’ reception using respective hashtags, constructing the datasets. Statistical differences regarding the companies are initially presented, on textual, as well as visual features, i.e., image classification by transfer learning. Appropriate preprocessing of English language posts and content analysis is subsequently performed, by automatically annotating the posts as one of four intent classes, thus facilitating the training of nine classifiers for a potential application capable of predicting user’s intent. By designing and carrying out a controlled experiment we validate that the resulted algorithms’ accuracy ranking is significant, identifying the two best performing algorithms; this is further improved by ensemble techniques. Finally, polarity analysis on users’ posts, leveraging a convolutional neural network, reveals a rather neutral to negative sentiment, with highly polarized user posts’ distributions.


1914 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 573-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry J. Nichols

1. Besredka's living sensitized vaccine, given intravenously, does not produce a typhoid lesion of the gall bladder in the rabbit. 2. The first transplant of this vaccine is capable of producing this lesion. Hence this vaccine is not entirely safe to handle. 3. Regular infections of the gall bladder have not been produced by carrying a known pathogenic strain on rabbit blood agar, by successive passage through animals, or by the use of freshly isolated strains. 4. No evidence could be demonstrated in the rabbit of the immunity produced in man by vaccination with a whole killed vaccine. 5. Vaccine treatment did not cure the gall bladder lesion. 6. With the present methods of producing infections in the chimpanzee and the rabbit, neither of these animals is suitable for deciding the problems of the immunization of man by vaccines. These problems must be settled, as some of them already have been settled, by actual experience with large numbers of men kept under close observation.


1918 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Lederman
Keyword(s):  

The Lancet ◽  
1906 ◽  
Vol 167 (4312) ◽  
pp. 1099-1103
Author(s):  
H.M.W. Gray ◽  
C.M. Aberd
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document