Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory partial epileptic seizures: a short-term and long-term investigations in Japan—seven institutes study

2002 ◽  
Vol 1247 ◽  
pp. 471-479
Author(s):  
Tetsuhiko Asakura ◽  
Katsumi Nakamura ◽  
Kazutaka Yatsushiro ◽  
Nobuyuki Shimizu ◽  
Buichi Ishijima ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 914-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Didier Clarençon ◽  
Sonia Pellissier ◽  
Valérie Sinniger ◽  
Astrid Kibleur ◽  
Dominique Hoffman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Pérez-Carbonell ◽  
Howard Faulkner ◽  
Sean Higgins ◽  
Michalis Koutroumanidis ◽  
Guy Leschziner

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulatory therapeutic option for drug-resistant epilepsy. In randomised controlled trials, VNS implantation has resulted in over 50% reduction in seizure frequency in 26%–40% of patients within 1 year. Long-term uncontrolled studies suggest better responses to VNS over time; however, the assessment of other potential predictive factors has led to contradictory results. Although initially designed for managing focal seizures, its use has been extended to other forms of drug-resistant epilepsy. In this review, we discuss the evidence supporting the use of VNS, its impact on seizure frequency and quality of life, and common adverse effects of this therapy. We also include practical guidance for the approach to and the management of patients with VNS in situ.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 641-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayse Serdaroglu ◽  
Ebru Arhan ◽  
Gökhan Kurt ◽  
Atilla Erdem ◽  
Tugba Hirfanoglu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 609-615
Author(s):  
Jesse Dawson ◽  
Navzer D. Engineer ◽  
Cecília N. Prudente ◽  
David Pierce ◽  
Gerard Francisco ◽  
...  

Background. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation may improve upper-limb impairment and function after ischemic stroke. Objective. To report 1-year safety, feasibility, adherence, and outcome data from a home exercise program paired with VNS using long-term follow-up data from a randomized double-blind study of rehabilitation therapy paired with Active VNS (n = 8) or Control VNS (n = 9). Methods. All people were implanted with a VNS device and underwent 6 weeks in clinic therapy with Control or Active VNS followed by home exercises through day 90. Thereafter, participants and investigators were unblinded. The Control VNS group then received 6 weeks in-clinic Active VNS (Cross-VNS group). All participants then performed an individualized home exercise program with self-administered Active VNS. Data from this phase are reported here. Outcome measures were Fugl-Meyer Assessment—Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (Functional and Time), Box and Block Test, Nine-Hole Peg Test, Stroke Impact Scale, and Motor Activity Log. Results. There were no VNS treatment–related serious adverse events during the long-term therapy. Two participants discontinued prior to receiving the full crossover VNS. On average, participants performed 200 ± 63 home therapy sessions, representing device use on 57.4% of home exercise days available for each participant. Pooled analysis revealed that 1 year after randomization, the FMA-UE score increased by 9.2 points (95% CI = 4.7 to 13.7; P = .001; n = 15). Other functional measures were also improved at 1 year. Conclusions. VNS combined with rehabilitation is feasible, with good long-term adherence, and may improve arm function after ischemic stroke.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. S177-S178
Author(s):  
Imad Libbus ◽  
Scott R. Stubbs ◽  
Scott Mindrebo ◽  
Bruce H. KenKnight ◽  
Lorenzo A. DiCarlo

Seizure ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 491-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas V. Alexopoulos ◽  
Prakash Kotagal ◽  
Tobias Loddenkemper ◽  
Jeffrey Hammel ◽  
William E. Bingaman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document