PS-187-Transient elastography is the most reliable non-invasive predictor of advanced liver fibrosis in fontan-associated liver disease: The VALDIG FONLIVER study

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. e115-e116
Author(s):  
Luis Téllez ◽  
Payance Audrey ◽  
Valérie Paradis ◽  
Enrique Rodríguez-Santiago ◽  
Aurélie Plessier ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantin Kazankov ◽  
Chiara Rosso ◽  
Ramy Younes ◽  
Angelo Armandi ◽  
Hannes Hagström ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: Non-invasive fibrosis staging is essential in metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Transient elastography (TE) is a well-established method for liver fibrosis assessment. We have previously shown that the macrophage marker sCD163 is an independent predictor for fibrosis in MAFLD. In the present study we tested whether the combination of macrophage markers and TE improves fibrosis prediction.Methods: We measured macrophage markers soluble (s)CD163 and mannose receptor (sMR) in two independent cohorts from Italy (n = 141) and Sweden (n = 70) with biopsy-proven MAFLD and available TE.Results: In the Italian cohort, TE and sCD163 showed similar moderate associations with liver fibrosis (rho = 0.56, p < 0.001 and rho = 0.42, p < 0.001, respectively). TE had an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (AUROC, with 95% CI) for fibrosis; F ≥ 2 = 0.79 (0.72–0.86), F ≥ 3 = 0.81 (0.73–0.89), F4 = 0.95 (0.90–1.0). sCD163 also predicted fibrosis well [F ≥ 2 = 0.71 (0.63–0.80), F ≥ 3 = 0.82 (0.74–0.90), F4 = 0.89 (0.76–1.0)]. However, combining sCD163 and TE did not improve the AUROCs significantly [F ≥ 2 = 0.79 (0.72–0.86), F ≥ 3 = 0.85 (0.78–0.92), F4 = 0.97 (0.93–1.0)]. In the Swedish cohort, TE showed a closer association with fibrosis (rho = 0.73, p < 0.001) than sCD163 (rho = 0.43, p < 0.001) and sMR (rho = 0.46, p < 0.001). TE predicted fibrosis well [F ≥ 2 = 0.88 (0.80–0.97), F ≥ 3 = 0.90 (0.83–0.97), F4 = 0.87 (0.78–0.96)], whereas sCD163 did not (best AUROC 0.75). sMR showed a better prediction [F ≥ 2 = 0.68 (0.56–0.81), F ≥ 3 = 0.82 (0.71–0.92), F4 = 0.79 (0.66–0.93)], but the addition of sMR did not further improve the prediction of fibrosis by TE.Conclusion: In these cohorts of MAFLD patients, TE was superior to macrophage markers for fibrosis prediction and in contrast to our hypothesis the addition of these markers to TE did not improve its predictive capability.


Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 783
Author(s):  
Alexandru Popa ◽  
Felix Bende ◽  
Roxana Șirli ◽  
Alina Popescu ◽  
Victor Bâldea ◽  
...  

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of four ultrasound-based techniques for the non-invasive multiparametric (MPUS) assessment of liver fibrosis (LF), steatosis (HS), and inflammation in patients with NAFLD. We included 215 consecutive adult patients with NAFLD (mean age: 54.9 ± 11.7; 54.5% were male), in whom LF, HS, and viscosity were evaluated in the same session using four new ultrasound-based techniques embedded on the Aixplorer MACH 30 system: ShearWave Elastography (2D-SWE.PLUS), Sound Speed Plane-wave UltraSound (SSp.PLUS), Attenuation Plane-wave UltraSound (Att.PLUS), and Viscosity Plane-wave UltraSound (Vi.PLUS). Transient Elastography (TE) with Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) (FibroScan) were considered as control. All elastographic measurements were performed according to guidelines. Valid liver stiffness measurements (LSM) were obtained in 98.6% of patients by TE, in 95.8% of patients by 2D-SWE.PLUS/Vi.PLUS, and in 98.1% of patients by Att.PLUS/SSp.PLUS, respectively. Therefore, 204 subjects were included in the final analysis. A strong correlation between LSMs by 2D-SWE.PLUS and TE (r = 0.89) was found. The best 2D-SWE.PLUS cut-off value for the presence of significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was 7 kPa. Regarding steatosis, SSp.PLUS correlated better than Att.PLUS with CAP values: (r = −0.74) vs. (r = 0.45). The best SSp.PLUS cut-off value for predicting the presence of significant steatosis was 1524 m/s. The multivariate regression analysis showed that Vi.PLUS values were associated with BMI and LSM by 2D-SWE.PLUS. In conclusion, MPUS was useful for assessing fibrosis, steatosis, and inflammation in a single examination in patients with NAFLD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Freya Rhodes ◽  
Sara Cococcia ◽  
Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths ◽  
Sudeep Tanwar ◽  
Rachel H. Westbrook ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims Alcohol use disorders (AUD) cause 7.2% of UK hospital admissions/year. Most are not managed by hepatologists and liver disease may be missed. We used the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test to investigate prevalence and associations of occult advanced liver fibrosis in AUD patients not known to have liver fibrosis. Methods Liver fibrosis was assessed using ELF in prospective patients referred to the Royal Free Hospital Alcohol Specialist Nurse (November 2018–December 2019). Known cases of liver disease were excluded. Patient demographics, blood tests, imaging data and alcohol histories recorded. Advanced fibrosis was categorised as ELF ≥ 10.5. Results The study included 99 patients (69% male, mean age 53.1 ± 14.4) with median alcohol intake 140 units/week (IQR 80.9–280), and a mean duration of harmful drinking of 15 years (IQR 10–27.5). The commonest reason for admission was symptomatic alcohol withdrawal (36%). The median ELF score was 9.62, range 6.87–13.78. An ELF score ≥ 10.5 was recorded in 28/99 (29%) patients, of whom 28.6% had normal liver tests. Within previous 5-years, 76% had attended A&E without assessment of liver disease. The ELF score was not associated with recent alcohol intake (p = 0.081), or inflammation (p = 0.574). Conclusion Over a quarter of patients with AUD had previously undetected advanced liver fibrosis assessed by ELF testing. ELF was not associated with liver inflammation or recent alcohol intake. The majority had recent missed opportunities for investigating liver disease. We recommend clinicians use non-invasive tests to assess liver fibrosis in patients admitted to hospital with AUD.


Author(s):  
Ulrike Teufel-Schäfer ◽  
Christa Flechtenmacher ◽  
Alexander Fichtner ◽  
Georg Friedrich Hoffmann ◽  
Jens Peter Schenk ◽  
...  

AbstractCurrently, liver histology is the gold standard for the detection of liver fibrosis. In recent years, new methods such as transient elastography (TE) have been introduced into clinical practice, which allow a non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of TE for higher grade fibrosis and whether there is any relevance which histologic score is used for matching. For this purpose, we compared TE with 4 different histologic scores in pediatric patients with hepatopathies. Furthermore, we also determined the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio (APRI) score, another non-invasive method, to investigate whether it is equally informative. Therefore, liver fibrosis in 75 children was evaluated by liver biopsy, TE and laboratory values. Liver biopsies were evaluated using four common histological scoring systems (Desmet, Metavir, Ishak and Chevalier’s semi-quantitative scoring system). The median age of the patients was 12.3 years. TE showed a good correlation to the degree of fibrosis severity independent of the histological scoring system used. The accuracy of the TE to distinguish between no/minimal fibrosis and severe fibrosis/cirrhosis was good (p = 0.001, AUC-ROCs > 0.81). The optimal cut-off value for the prediction of severe fibrosis was 10.6 kPa. In contrast, the APRI score in our collective showed no correlation to fibrosis.Conclusion: TE shows a good correlation to the histological findings in children with hepatopathy, independent of the used histological scoring system. What is Known:• The current gold standard for detecting liver fibrosis is liver biopsy. Novel non-invasive ultrasound-based methods are introduced to clinical diagnostics.• Most histological scores have been developed and evaluated in adult populations and for only one specific liver disease.What is New:• Transient elastography (TE) in children showed a good correlation to fibrosis severity irrespective of the utilized histological scoring system.• The aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio (APRI) showed no correlation with different stages of liver fibrosis in children.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-182
Author(s):  
Theodoros Androutsakos ◽  
Maria Schina ◽  
Abraham Pouliakis ◽  
Athanasios Kontos ◽  
Nikolaos Sipsas ◽  
...  

Background: Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is common in HIV-infected individuals. Liver biopsy remains the gold-standard procedure for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis, but both Transient Elastography (TE) and Non-invasive Biomarkers (NIBMs) have emerged as alternatives. Objectives: Our study’s aim was to validate commonly used NIBMs for the assessment of liver fibrosis in a cohort of Greek HIV-mono-infected patients. Methods: Inclusion criteria were confirmed HIV-infection and age>18 years and exclusion criteria HBV or HCV seropositivity, liver disease other than NAFLD, alcohol abuse, ascites, transaminases levels>4xULN(upper limit of normal) and Body-Mass index(BMI)>40. Liver stiffness (LS) measurement with TE and thorough laboratory work up and medical history were acquired at study entry. FIB-4, APRI, NFS, BARD, Forns and Lok scores were calculated for each patient. Results: A total of 157 patients were eligible for this study. Significant liver fibrosis, compatible with Metavir score of F3-F4, was found in only 11(7%) patients. These findings were in accordance with those of the NIBMs; the BARD score constituting the only exception, allocating 102(65%) patients as having significant liver fibrosis. In order to obtain a balance between sensitivity and specificity new cut-offs for each NIBM were calculated; FIB-4 score yielded the best results, since by changing the cut-off to 1.49 a sensitivity and specificity balanced for both close to 85% was achieved. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that NIBMs can be used for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in HIV mono-infected patients. New cut-offs for NIBMs should probably be calculated, to help distinguishing patients with significant from those with mild/no fibrosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 817-827
Author(s):  
Jorge Luis Poo ◽  
Aldo Torre ◽  
Juan Ramón Aguilar-Ramírez ◽  
Mauricio Cruz ◽  
Luis Mejía-Cuán ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims Pirfenidone (PFD), an oral antifibrotic drug, has been authorized by the EMA and FDA for treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Few studies have addressed its use in advanced liver fibrosis (ALF). We evaluated a prolonged-release formulation (PR-PFD) plus standard of care on disease progression in ALF. Methods 281 ALF patients from 12 centers receiving PR-PFD (600 mg bid) were screened; 122 completed 1 year of treatment. Additionally, 74 patients received only standard of care regimen. Average age was 64 ± 12 years, 58% female. 43.5% had fatty liver disease (NAFLD), 22.5% viral hepatitis C (VHC), 17% autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and 17% alcoholic liver disease (ALD). Baseline fibrosis was F4 in 74% and F3 in 26%. Antifibrotic effects were assessed by transient elastography (Fibroscan®) and Fibro Test® (FT); Cytokines and PFD plasma levels were tracked and quality of life evaluated. Results We found a significant reduction in fibrosis in 35% of PR-PFD patients and only in 4.1% in non PR-PFD patients. Child–Pugh score improved in 29.7%. Biochemical values remained stable; 40.6% and 43.3% decreased ALT or AST, respectively. TGFβ1 (pg/mL) levels were lower in PFD-treated patients. PFD serum concentration (µg/mL) was higher (8.2 ± 1.7) in fibrosis regression profile (FRP) patients compared to fibrosis progression profile (FPP) patients (4.7 ± 0.3 µg/mL, p < 0.01). 12% reported transient burning or nausea and 7% photosensitivity. Quality of life (Euro-Qol scale) improved from 62 ± 5 to 84 ± 3 (p < 0.001) and from 32 ± 3 to 42 ± 2 (p < 0.008) (FACIT scale). Conclusions PR-PFD is efficacious and safe in ALF and associated with promising antifibrotic effects. Trial registration Clinical trial number: NCT04099407.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document