scholarly journals Left ventricular remodeling is the most common cause of systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: Findings from the stent-PAMI study

2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Kishore J. Harjai ◽  
Cindy L. Grines ◽  
Steve Mattichak ◽  
Judith A. Boura ◽  
Gregg W. Stone ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 652-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Celic ◽  
Milica Dekleva ◽  
Anka Majstorovic ◽  
Nenad Radivojevic ◽  
Nada Kostic ◽  
...  

Introduction. Dynamic changing of left ventricular geometry and contractile state after acute myocardial infarction is responsible for various aspects of left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction. A number of studies have shown that myocardial performance index allows prediction of acute myocardial infarction complications. The objective of our study was to determine the power of myocardial performance index to predict and assess the severity of left ventricular remodeling, systolic and diastolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction over the long term. Material and methods. Echocardiography was performed within the first week of hospitalization, after one, three and six months in 77 patients with first acute myocardial infarction. At the end of the study the patients were divided into group A and B with mild and severe left ventricular remodeling, respectively. Results. Myocardial performance index was significantly lower in group A compared to B, at the beginning (0.62 vs. 0.75; p=0.002), and at the end of study (0, 60 vs. 0, 69; p=0.004). After six months, 31% of study patients developed LV systolic dysfunction with prevalence in group B (56% vs. 19%, p=0.002). Myocardial performance index ? 0.70 at first week after acute myocardial infarction is a strong predictive parameter for extensive early and late left ventricular remodeling and systolic dysfunction (p<0.05), but it is not a valuable predictor of diastolic failure. Discussion and conclusions. MPI obtained at first week of acute myocardial infarction was predictive for early and long term left ventricular remodeling and systolic dysfunction. Myocardial performance index had doubtful clinical use in assessing dynamics of remodeling and it was without clinical value in predicting diastolic function deterioration.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 120-123
Author(s):  
Ioana Cîrneală ◽  
Diana Opincariu ◽  
István Kovács ◽  
Monica Chițu ◽  
Imre Benedek

Abstract Heart failure is a clinical syndrome that appears as a consequence of a structural disease, and the most common cause of left ventricular systolic dysfunction results from myocardial ischemia. Cardiac remodeling and neuroendocrine activation are the major compensatory mechanisms in heart failure. The main objective of the study is to identify the association between serum biomarkers illustrating the extent of myocardial necrosis (highly sensitive troponin as-says), left ventricular dysfunction (NT-proBNP), and systemic inflammatory response (illustrated via serum levels of hsCRP and interleukins) during the acute phase of a myocardial infarction, and the left ventricular remodeling process at 6 months following the acute event, quantified via speckle tracking echocardiography. The study will include 400 patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction without signs and symptoms of heart failure at the time of enrollment that will undergo a complex clinical examination and speckle tracking echocardiography. Serum samples from the peripheral blood will be collected in order to determine the inflammatory serum biomarkers. After 6 months, patients will be divided into 2 groups according to the development of ventricular remodeling, quantified by speckle tracking echocardiography: group 1 will consist of patients with a remodeling index lower than 15%, and group 2 will consist of patients with a remodeling index higher than 15%. All clinical and imaging data obtained at the baseline will be compared between these two groups in order to determine the features associated with a higher risk of deleterious ventricular remodeling and heart failure.


2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHEN J. MATTICHAK ◽  
KISHORE J. HARJAI ◽  
JACOB R. DUTCHER ◽  
JUDITH A. BOURA ◽  
GREGG STONE ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document