FREQUENCY AND ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF FUNCTIONAL TRICUSPID REGURGITATION IN PATIENTS WITH ISOLATED CHRONIC ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Abstract Objective The study aimed to investigate the functional capacity and hemodynamics at rest and during exercise in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and severe functional symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (AF-FTR). Background Symptoms and clinical performance of severe AF-FTR mimic the population of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Severe AF-FTR is known to be associated with an adverse prognosis whereas less is reported about the clinical performance including exercise capacity and hemodynamics in patients symptomatic AF-FTR. Methods Right heart catheterization (RHC) at rest and during exercise was conducted in a group of patients with stable chronic AF-TR and compared with a group of patients with HFpEF diagnosed with cardiac amyloid cardiomyopathy (CA). All patients had preserved ejection fraction and no significant left-sided disease. Results Patients with AF-FTR demonstrated a low exercise capacity that was comparable to CA patients (TR 4.9 ± 1.2 METS vs. CA 4. 7 ± 1.5 METS; P = 0.78) with an average peak maximal oxygen consumption of 15 mL/min/kg. Right atrium pressure increased significantly more in the AF-FTR patients as compared to CA patients at peak exercise (25 ± 8 vs 19 ± 9, p < 0.01) whereas PCWP increased significantly to a similar extent in both groups (31 ± 4 vs 31 ± 8 mmHg, p = 0.88). Cardiac output (CO) was significantly lower among AF-FTR at rest as compared to CA patients (3.6 ± 0.9 vs 4.4 ± 1.3 l/min; p < 0.05) whereas both groups demonstrated a poor but comparable CO reserve at peak exercise (7.3 ± 2.9 vs 7.9 ± 3.8 l/min, p = 0.59). Conclusions AF-FTR contributes to the development of advanced heart failure symptoms and poor exercise capacity reflected in increased atrial filling pressures, reduced cardiac output at rest and during exercise sharing common features seen in HFpEF patients with other etiologies.

Download Full-text

144 Atrial and ventricular phenotypes in a cohort of patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation: clinical, echocardiographic, and prognostic aspects

European Heart Journal Supplements ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/suab132.024 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽

Author(s):

Mara Gavazzoni ◽

Francesca Heilbron ◽

Denisa Florescu ◽

Pellegrino Ciampi ◽

Andrada C Guta ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Right Ventricle ◽

Tricuspid Regurgitation ◽

Composite Endpoint ◽

Right Atrial ◽

P Value ◽

Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation ◽

And Function ◽

Rv Function

Abstract Aims Atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation (A-FTR) has emerged as a newly recognized phenotype of functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR), occurring in patients with atrial fibrillation and right atrial (RA) dilation but normal right ventricular (RV) size and function. Its prevalence, echocardiographic features, and prognosis have not yet clarified since most evidence to date has included indiscriminately FTR patients with A-FTR and ventricular form (V-FTR). Aim of this study was to investigate the differences between these two phenotypes of FTR in terms of clinical correlates, echocardiographic aspects, and prognosis. Methods and results A total of 180 consecutive patients with moderate to severe FTR referred for echocardiography in two Italian centres were retrospectively enrolled. A-FTR was defined as: (1) longstanding atrial fibrillation; (2) PASP <50 mmHg; (3) left ventricular ejection fraction > 60% (complete according to the ACC guidelines); and (4) no significant left side valve disease. 3D TTE was used for the quantitative assessment of TR and chamber sizing and function. The composite endpoint of death for any cause and heart failure (HF) hospitalization was used as primary outcome of this analysis; secondary endpoint was HF-hospitalization. Patients with A-FTR were 30% of the population; they were older than those one with V-FTR; with higher systolic blood pressure and less advanced symptoms. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was more prevalent in V-FTR. Patients with V-FTR had larger 3D-derived right ventricle (RV) volumes, both diastolic and systolic, while right ventricle ejection fraction (RVEF) was similar. RV functional parameters as TAPSE, RVFWLS, and RVGLS were significantly lower in the V-FTR patients as well as all the parameters of RV-pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling. After a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR: 2–48), 72 patients (40%) reached the primary endpoint and 64 (36%) hospitalized for HF. The rate of composite endpoint tended to be lower in A-FTR than in V-FTR (29% vs. 44%, P-value: 0.1); the rate of hospitalization for HF was higher in V-FTR patients (22% vs. 41%, P-value: 0.04). Correlates of combined endpoint in both groups were: functional class of dyspnoea (NYHA class III–IV vs. I–II), severe TR grade (HR in V-FTR: 2.88 [1.63–5.06], P < 0.01; HR in A-FTR: 8[3–17], P < 0.01); RV volumes, RA volumes. Estimated SPAP as well as all the parameters of RV function and of RV-PA coupling were correlates of prognosis only in V-FTR; conversely, parameters of TA dimensions were related to combined Endpoint in A-FTR phenotype, while RV function and RV-PA coupling indexes did not. Conclusions Patients having A-FTR have an incidence of combined endpoint slightly different, without reaching a statistically significant difference, thus remarking the fact that A-FTR could not be considered ‘more benign’ and should therefore be targeted. Prognostic predictors are different between A-.FTR and V-FTR patients.

Download Full-text

Clinical Performance and Exercise Hemodynamics in Patients with Severe Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation and Chronic Atrial Fibrillation

10.21203/rs.3.rs-240366/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Jesper Jensen ◽

Tor Clemmensen ◽

Christian Frederiksen ◽

Joachim Schofer ◽

Mads Andersen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Cardiac Output ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Exercise Capacity ◽

Tricuspid Regurgitation ◽

Clinical Performance ◽

Chronic Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Peak Exercise ◽

Preserved Ejection Fraction

Abstract ObjectiveThe study aimed to investigate the functional capacity and hemodynamics at rest and during exercise in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and severe functional symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (AF-FTR).BackgroundSymptoms and clinical performance of severe AF-FTR mimic the population of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Severe AF-FTR is known to be associated with an adverse prognosis whereas less is reported about the clinical performance including exercise capacity and hemodynamics in patients symptomatic AF-FTR. MethodsRight heart catheterization (RHC) at rest and during exercise was conducted in a group of patients with stable chronic AF-TR and compared with a group of patients with HFpEF diagnosed with cardiac amyloid cardiomyopathy (CA). All patients had preserved ejection fraction and no significant left-sided disease. ResultsPatients with AF-FTR demonstrated a low exercise capacity that was comparable to CA patients (TR 4.9 ± 1.2 METS vs. CA 4. 7 ± 1.5 METS; P = 0.78) with an average peak maximal oxygen consumption of 15 mL/min/kg. Right atrium pressure increased significantly more in the AF-FTR patients as compared to CA patients at peak exercise (25 ± 8 vs 19 ± 9, p<0.01) whereas PCWP increased significantly to a similar extent in both groups (31 ± 4 vs 31 ± 8 mmHg, p=0.88). Cardiac output (CO) was significantly lower among AF-FTR at rest as compared to CA patients (3.6 ± 0.9 vs 4.4 ± 1.3 l/min; p<0.05) whereas both groups demonstrated a poor but comparable CO reserve at peak exercise (7.3 ± 2.9 vs 7.9 ± 3.8 l/min, p=0.59). ConclusionsAF-FTR contributes to the development of advanced heart failure symptoms and poor exercise capacity reflected in increased atrial filling pressures, reduced cardiac output at rest and during exercise sharing common features seen in HFpEF patients with other etiologies.

Download Full-text