DONOR PATIENTS ON VASOACTIVE MEDICATIONS DOES NOT IMPACT SURVIVAL FOR HEART TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS BASED ON THE UNITED NETWORK FOR ORGAN SHARING (UNOS) DATABASE

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (9) ◽  
pp. 876
Author(s):  
Ramola Panchal ◽  
Kristen Carter ◽  
Seth Lirette ◽  
Anthony Panos ◽  
Richard Cochran ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 377-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafik Samuel ◽  
Peter Axelrod ◽  
Keith St. John ◽  
Thomas Fekete ◽  
Sharon Alexander ◽  
...  

Objective:To describe an outbreak of mediastinitis in heart transplant recipients.Design:Retrospective and contemporaneous cohort study.Setting:Urban tertiary-care university hospital with a large cardiac transplantation program.Patients:Heart transplant recipients.Interventions:Modifications of donor harvest technique; procedures aimed at decreasing skin and mucosal bacterial colonization; strict aseptic technique in the intensive care unit; and aggressive policing of established infection control practices.Results:In April 1999, mediastinitis rates among heart transplant recipients increased abruptly from a baseline of 6 cases per 100 procedures to sequential quarterly rates of 22, 31, and 50 cases per 100 procedures, whereas infection rates in other cardiac operations were unchanged. Bacteria causing these infections were multidrug-resistant "nosocomial" organisms. The epidemic occurred 2 months after a change in the United Network for Organ Sharing organ allocation algorithm. This change resulted in an increase in the duration of preoperative hospitalization from a median of 52 to 79 days (P= .008) and may have promoted prolonged hospitalization of patients with high illness severity. Aggressive multidisciplinary interventions were temporally associated with a return to preoperative mediastinitis rates without changing length of hospitalization prior to transplantation.Conclusions:Changes in organ allocation for transplant that prolong waiting time in the hospital and alter illness acuity may lead to increased rates of postoperative infection. Measures to limit bacterial colonization may be a helpful countervailing strategy.


2022 ◽  
Vol 272 ◽  
pp. 69-78
Author(s):  
Yuangao Liu ◽  
Fernando A. Padilla ◽  
Edward A. Graviss ◽  
Duc T. Nguyen ◽  
Harveen K. Lamba ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishant D Patel ◽  
Eric S Weiss ◽  
Lois U Nwakanma ◽  
Stuart D Russell ◽  
William A Baumgartner ◽  
...  

Introduction : Accepted donor criteria for heart transplantation limit allografts to donors within 20–30% of the recipient’s weight. We analyzed the impact of donor to recipient (DR) weight ratio on survival after heart transplantation. Methods : Adult heart transplant recipients reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing from 1999–2007 were divided into 3 groups based on DR weight ratio: <0.8, 0.8–1.2, and >1.2. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate survival. Propensity-adjusted Cox regression modeling was used to analyze predictors of mortality. Results : 15284 heart transplant recipients were analyzed: 2078 had weight ratio of <0.8, 9684 had 0.8–1.2, and 3522 had >1.2. Survival was not statistically different between groups (Figure ). Among patients with weight ratio <0.8, survival was lower for recipients with high pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (>4 Woods units) (Figure ). Among recipients with high PVR, 5-year survival was similar for those with weight ratio 0.8–1.2 and >1.2 (p =0.44 ). Propensity-adjusted multivariable analysis demonstrated that weight ratio <0.8 did not predict mortality (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.94–1.27; p =0.21). Five-year survival after propensity matching was not statistically different between those with weight ratio <0.8 versus ≥0.8 ( p =0.37). Conclusions : Weight ratio did not predict mortality after heart transplantation. Undersized allografts in recipients with normal/low PVR did not adversely effect survival. Oversized allografts in recipients with high PVR did not provide survival advantage over normal-sized allografts. Extending donor criteria to include undersized hearts in select recipients should be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document