An Outbreak of Mediastinitis Among Heart Transplant Recipients Apparently Related to a Change in the United Network for Organ Sharing Guidelines

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 377-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafik Samuel ◽  
Peter Axelrod ◽  
Keith St. John ◽  
Thomas Fekete ◽  
Sharon Alexander ◽  
...  

Objective:To describe an outbreak of mediastinitis in heart transplant recipients.Design:Retrospective and contemporaneous cohort study.Setting:Urban tertiary-care university hospital with a large cardiac transplantation program.Patients:Heart transplant recipients.Interventions:Modifications of donor harvest technique; procedures aimed at decreasing skin and mucosal bacterial colonization; strict aseptic technique in the intensive care unit; and aggressive policing of established infection control practices.Results:In April 1999, mediastinitis rates among heart transplant recipients increased abruptly from a baseline of 6 cases per 100 procedures to sequential quarterly rates of 22, 31, and 50 cases per 100 procedures, whereas infection rates in other cardiac operations were unchanged. Bacteria causing these infections were multidrug-resistant "nosocomial" organisms. The epidemic occurred 2 months after a change in the United Network for Organ Sharing organ allocation algorithm. This change resulted in an increase in the duration of preoperative hospitalization from a median of 52 to 79 days (P= .008) and may have promoted prolonged hospitalization of patients with high illness severity. Aggressive multidisciplinary interventions were temporally associated with a return to preoperative mediastinitis rates without changing length of hospitalization prior to transplantation.Conclusions:Changes in organ allocation for transplant that prolong waiting time in the hospital and alter illness acuity may lead to increased rates of postoperative infection. Measures to limit bacterial colonization may be a helpful countervailing strategy.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bandar Al-Ghamdi

Background: Fasting during Ramadan is considered one of the most sacred Islamic rituals. To our knowledge, there is no data about Ramadan fasting in heart transplant recipients. Objectives: To assess the ability of heart transplant recipients to fast the month of Ramadan and to study the fasting effects on their clinical condition Design: A cross-sectional study of heart transplant recipients attending the heart transplant clinic in the three months following Ramadan in 1439 and 1440 Hijri (May-June 2018 and 2019). Setting: Heart transplant clinic in a tertiary care hospital in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Patients and Methods: Heart transplant recipients attending the heart transplant clinic in the Heart Center at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center (KFSH&RC), Riyadh. Data about Ramadan fasting was documented using standard case report form (CRF), and data were collected from the medical records about their clinical and laboratory findings before and after Ramadan. Main Outcome Measures: Ability of heart transplant receipts to fast during Ramadan and the effect of fasting on their medical condition. Sample Size: One hundred twenty heart transplant recipients were approached to participate in this study. Ninety-two patients agreed to participate in the study with seventy-eight patients fasted during Ramadan. Results: Seventy-eight patients were able to fast Ramadan (84.8%). In comparison to the months before and after Ramadan, 44 of the fasting patients (56.4%) reported no change in their overall health, 29 patients (37.2%) reported feeling better, and 5 patients (6.4%) reported feeling worse during fasting. Sixty patients (76.9%) reported no significant new symptoms, and 18 patients (23.08%) reported one or more new symptoms. Conclusions: It seems that the majority of heart transplant recipients beyond one year of transplantation can fast Ramadan without having significant medical issues Limitations: The small number of participants and the limitations of cross-sectional design.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s382-s383
Author(s):  
Souad Belkebir ◽  
Alaa Kanaan ◽  
Rawan Jeetawi

Background: The prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in acute healthcare settings is increasing worldwide. Active screening for MDROs carriers on admission permits the prompt implementation of the appropriate precautions to decrease the probability of cross transmission to other inpatients. Objective: To report the spectrum of bacterial nasal, axilla, and perianal colonization among in patients at Najah National University Hospital (NNUH) during 2018. Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed at NNUH, a tertiary-care referral university hospital in Nablus, north of Palestine, that includes medical and surgical ICUs for both adults and children from January to August 2018. Nasal, axilla, and perianal swabs were collected within the first 24 hours of admission according to hospital policy. Patients who were referred from another hospital, who were admitted to a hospital for at least 2 nights during the previous 8 months, and who are known to have an MDROs in the past were included. Swab samples were processed for isolation and identification of these multidrug-resistant strains. Transmission-based precautions were implemented if positive results were reported (ie, contact isolation) and decolonization regimens were applied according to the CDC recommendations (muporocin ointment for nasal MRSA, daily bathing with chlorhexidine 2% soap for the rest). A daily isolation list was circulated among bed managers and senior nurses and head of departments for appropriate management of beds and reallocation of patients. The antibiotic susceptibility pattern was assessed using the disc-diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar and a Vitek-2 system. Results: During the period of the study, 1,425 nasal swabs, 1,245 axilla swabs, and 300 perianal swabs were collected according to the inclusion criteria. Positive results were reportedin 7%, 4%, and 44% for nasal, axilla, and perianal specimens, respectively. Regarding the distribution of bacterial colonization in the nasal swab, 73% were MRSA; for the axial, 29% were Pseudomonas; and from the perianal swab, the most prevalent pathogen was ESBL (56%) (Figs. 1–3). A discrepancy between the number of nasal or axilla and perianal swabs was observed, which was mainly due to the refusal of many patients to have the sample collected by the nurse. Conclusions: Colonization of the skin and mucous membranes of inpatients with MDROs is considered a risk factor for developing future infections. Therefore, active screening for those pathogens is critical for infection prevention and control programs and patient safety in acute-care settings.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


2000 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 2392-2395 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.J Ko ◽  
N.C Chien ◽  
N.K Chou ◽  
S.S Wang ◽  
S.H Chu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document