scholarly journals OUTCOMES AFTER OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST AND TIMING OF CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION WITH THE USE OF A PROGNOSTIC PREDICTIVE SCORING SYSTEM

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 1027
Author(s):  
Shilpa Singh ◽  
Deepak Vedamurthy ◽  
Keshab Subedi ◽  
Kirk Garratt ◽  
Neil Wimmer
Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryn E Mumma ◽  
James F Holmes ◽  
Machelle D Wilson ◽  
Deborah B Diercks

Introduction: Cardiac catheterization is recommended for patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with a suspected cardiac etiology. Women are less likely than men to receive cardiac catheterization in other presentations of cardiovascular disease, but it remains unknown whether this disparity extends to OHCA. Objective: To determine whether patient sex is associated with undergoing cardiac catheterization after OHCA. Methods: We included all adult cases in the 2011 California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) database with a present-on-admission diagnosis of cardiac arrest (ICD-9-CM 427.5) or sudden cardiac death (ICD-9-CM 798) who were admitted from the emergency department to an acute care hospital. Data extracted from the OSHPD database included patient demographics, diagnoses, and procedures. ICD-9-CM procedure codes from the OSHPD database were used to identify patients who received cardiac catheterization. To determine factors associated with undergoing cardiac catheterization, we used a hierarchical logistic regression model that included age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance type, ventricular arrest rhythm, and treatment at a hospital with 24/7 percutaneous coronary intervention capability. Results: We studied 4493 men and 3287 women admitted following OHCA. Women were older (median age 70 vs 64 years; p<0.001), had had fewer ventricular arrest rhythms (21.8% vs 31.7%; p<0.001), and received fewer cardiac catheterization procedures [12.5% vs 21.4%; p<0.0001]. This sex difference in cardiac catheterization persisted in the multivariable hierarchical model (adjusted OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.57-0.76; p<0.0001) and in a subgroup analysis including only patients with ventricular arrest rhythms (adjusted OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.51-0.78; p<0.0001) Conclusion: Sex differences exist in cardiac catheterization following resuscitation from OHCA. Future efforts should focus on understanding and resolving these differences.


Resuscitation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raina M. Merchant ◽  
Benjamin S. Abella ◽  
Monica Khan ◽  
Kuang-Ning Huang ◽  
David G. Beiser ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Elkaryoni ◽  
John J Lopez ◽  
Paul S Chan

Background: The characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) have not been well-described. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of patients with an IHCA in the CCL versus those in the operating room (OR) and the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: Within the American Heart Association’s Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation® registry, we identified patients 18 years of age or older with an IHCA in the CCL, OR, or ICU between 2000 and 2019. We compared rates of survival to discharge for patients in the CCL, OR, and ICU. Additionally, we examined predictors of survival to discharge for patients with IHCA in the CCL. Results: There were 6866, 5181, and 181,832 patients with an IHCA in the CCL, OR, and ICU, respectively. Patients with IHCAs in the CCL were more likely to have a shockable cardiac arrest rhythm as compared with those in the OR and ICU. Overall, 2614 (38.1%) patients with IHCA in the CCL survived to discharge, as compared with 30,833 (16.9%) from the ICU and 2096 (40.5%) from the OR. After adjustment for 27 patient and cardiac arrest factors, patients with IHCA in CCL were more likely to survive to discharge as compared with those with IHCA from the ICU (odds ratio, 1.37 [95% CI: 1.29-1.46], p<0.001). In contrast, they were less likely to survive to discharge as compared with those with IHCA in the OR (odds ratio, 0.81 [95% CI: 0.69-0.94], p=0.006). Predictors of survival to discharge in patients with IHCA in the CCL included white race, pulseless ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, and IHCA during normal hours and on weekdays, while having myocardial infarction during this or prior hospitalization was associated with less survival to discharge. (Table). Conclusion: IHCA in the CCL is not uncommon and has a lower survival rate as compared with IHCA in other procedural areas such as the OR. The reasons for this difference deserve further study given that response to IHCAs in both settings should be similar.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kelham ◽  
T N Jones ◽  
K S Rathod ◽  
O Guttmann ◽  
A Proudfoot ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction There has been an increasing focus on the development of scoring systems for patients admitted following resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) to determine both prognosis and short-term management. One such system, the CREST score, has been shown to predict circulatory aetiology death in patients without ST-elevation myocardial infarction, however with an increasing number of OHCAs seen, general scoring systems to predict outcome in OHCA would be helpful. Aims We sought to determine whether the addition of an admission lactate ≥8 mmol/l to the existing CREST score was able to better predict in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with OHCA. Methods and results We retrospectively analysed the data of 500 patients admitted with an OHCA of presumed cardiac origin to our tertiary cardiac centre between June 2014 and Oct 2018. Mean age was 62.6y (±14.7), 379 (76%) were male and 250 (50%) were Caucasian. 313 (62.6%) were admitted with ST elevation myocardial infarction or equivalent. 48.6% (243/500) of patients died in hospital and of those that survived, 20.2% (52/257) were left with hypoxic brain injury (CPC score 3–4). When analysed independently, all individual factors other than history of Coronary artery disease (OR 1.47, p=0.084) significantly predicted in-hospital mortality: Admission lactate ≥8 mmol/l (OR 6.78, p<0.0001), non-shockable Rhythm (OR 10.9, p<0.0001), Ejection fraction <30% (OR 5.84, p<0.0001), Shock at presentation (OR 5.49, p<0.0001) and ischaemic Time >25 minutes (OR 12.8, p<0.0001). When each factor was assigned one point and totalled, both increasing CREST and C-AREST scores were associated with increasing in-hospital mortality: CREST (0–5 points): 4.3%, 30.5%, 41.5%, 85.6%, 95.2%, 100% vs C-AREST (0–6 points): 9.1%, 28.3%, 41.9%, 62.8%, 97.6%, 96.4%, 100%. When analysed with stepwise logistic regression, the addition of admission lactate ≥8 mmol/l to the model improved the prediction of in-hospital mortality: CREST (40.8% of variance explained) vs C-AREST (43.3%), with admission lactate remaining an independently significant predictor (OR 3.67, p=0.002). Conclusion We describe a novel modification to the previously described CREST scoring system for OHCA: the C-AREST score. The addition of admission lactate ≥8 mmol/l may have a role in differentiating those in intermediate risk categories (score between 2 and 3) where the predicted in hospital mortality would otherwise vary greatly. Given the relative ease of obtaining admission lactate, this scoring system may further improve stratification of patients who may or may not benefit from invasive management.


Resuscitation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 1533-1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony C. Camuglia ◽  
Varinder K. Randhawa ◽  
Shahar Lavi ◽  
Darren L. Walters

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document