Distinction Between Arrhythmic and Nonarrhythmic Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction Based on Heart Rate Variability, Signal-Averaged Electrocardiogram, Ventricular Arrhythmias and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

1996 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Hartikainen, MD, Phd
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Rate Variability ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmias ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

scholarly journals Late ventricular potentials in risk assessment of the occurrence of complex ventricular arrhythmia in patients with myocardial infarction and heart failure

2004 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 589-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoran Cosic ◽  
Dragan Tavciovski ◽  
Aleksandra Jovelic ◽  
Radoslav Romanovic
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmias ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Aim. To determine the prognostic significance of late ventricular potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiogram and left ventricular ejection fraction for the occurrence of complex ventricular arrhythmia in patients treated with accelerated tissue-type plasminogen activator, using the rapid protocol, within six months of acute myocardial infarction. Methods. In this analytic observational prospective study patients were divided into four groups: patients with left ventricular ejection fraction bellow 40% and late ventricular potentials, patients with left ventricular ejection fraction bellow 40% and without late ventricular potentials, patients with left ventricular ejection fraction over 40% and late ventricular potentials, and patients with left ventricular ejection fraction over 40% and without late ventricular potentials. Complex ventricular arrhythmias (Lown grade IVa, IVb, and V) were recorded using standard electrocardiography and 24-hour Holter monitoring 21, 60, and 90 days after acute myocardial infarction, respectively. Serial recordings of signal-averaged electrocardiogram were obtained 30, 90, and 180 days after acute myocardial infarction. Left ventricular ejection fraction was determined by echocardiography between 15 and 21 days after acute myocardial infarction. Multivariant logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relation between late ventricular potentials and left ventricular ejection fraction with the occurrence of complex ventricular arrhythmias. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of late ventricular potentials and left ventricular ejection fraction for the occurrence of complex ventricular arrhythmias were determined. Results. The prospective study included 80 patients (73% men), mean age 64 ? 3.5 years. Complex ventricular arrhythmias were recorded in 34 (42.5%) of patients, all 17 (50%) of which were from the first group (p<0.01). Complex ventricular arrhythmias were recorded in 25 (73.5%) patients with late ventricular potentials, and in 23 (67.6%) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction bellow 40%. Left ventricular ejection fraction bellow 40% and late ventricular potentials represented independent predictors for the occurrence of complex ventricular arrhythmias (RR=14.33, p<0.01). When combined with left ventricular ejection fraction bellow 40%, late ventricular potentials had sensitivity (0.50), specificity (0.93), and positive predictive accuracy (0.85) higher than late ventricular potentials alone (0.44, 0.67, and 0.37, respectively) for the occurrence of complex ventricular arrhythmias following acute myocardial infarction. Conclusion. In this study, late ventricular potentials in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction bellow 40% represented the independent predictor for the occurrence of complex ventricular arrhythmias in the first six months after the first myocardial infarction treated with accelerated tissue-type plasminogen activator, using the rapid protocol.

scholarly journals Survival Predictors of Heart Rate Variability After Myocardial Infarction With and Without Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junichiro Hayano ◽  
Norihiro Ueda ◽  
Masaya Kisohara ◽  
Emi Yuda ◽  
Robert M. Carney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Rate Variability ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Survival Predictors

BackgroundHeart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate (HR) dynamics are used to predict the survival probability of patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but the association has been established in patients with mixed levels of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).ObjectiveWe investigated whether the survival predictors of HRV and HR dynamics depend on LVEF after AMI.MethodsWe studied 687 post-AMI patients including 147 with LVEF ≤35% and 540 with LVEF &gt;35%, of which 23 (16%) and 22 (4%) died during the 25 month follow-up period, respectively. None had an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator. From baseline 24 h ECG, the standard deviation (SDNN), root mean square of successive difference (rMSSD), percentage of successive difference &gt;50 ms (pNN50) of normal-to-normal R-R interval, ultra-low (ULF), very-low (VLF), low (LF), and high (HF) frequency power, deceleration capacity (DC), short-term scaling exponent (α1), non-Gaussianity index (λ25s), and the amplitude of cyclic variation of HR (Acv) were calculated.ResultsThe predictors were categorized into three clusters; DC, SDNN, α1, ULF, VLF, LF, and Acv as Cluster 1, λ25s independently as Cluster 2, and rMSSD, pNN50, and HF as Cluster 3. In univariate analyses, mortality was best predicted by indices belonging to Cluster 1 regardless of LVEF. In multivariate analyses, however, mortality in patients with low LVEF was best predicted by the combinations of Cluster 1 predictors or Cluster 1 and 3 predictors, whereas in patients without low LVEF, it was best predicted by the combinations of Cluster 1 and 2 predictors.ConclusionThe mortality risk in post-AMI patients with low LVEF is predicted by indices reflecting decreased HRV or HR responsiveness and cardiac parasympathetic dysfunction, whereas in patients without low LVEF, the risk is predicted by a combination of indices that reflect decreased HRV or HR responsiveness and indicator that reflects abrupt large HR changes suggesting sympathetic involvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document