Feasability and safety of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors: Results of a single-center study

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-322
Author(s):  
Mindy Goldman
Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2065-2065
Author(s):  
R. Marks ◽  
A. Spyridonidis ◽  
G. Ihorst ◽  
H. Bertz ◽  
J. Finke

Abstract In a retrospective study we analysed the impact of the graft composition and several clinical criteria on the outcome of adult AML (n=104) and ALL (n=29) patients undergoing first allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors at the University Hospital in Freiburg. The median age of the patients was 52 years (range 18–74) and of the donors 35 years (range 20–58). All patients above 55 years of age received a preparative regimen consisting of fludarabine, melphalan and carmustin (FBM) whereas patients <55y received standard busulphan and cyclophosphamide. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis consisted of rabbit ATG (40–60 mg/kg; Fresenius) and cyclosporine combined with MTX in BuCy treated patients or mycophenolate mofetil in patients treated with FBM. There was a trend in the younger donors to mobilize more CD34+ cells than older ones (r=−0.147, p=0.11). A median of 6.1x106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 1.5–17.0) and 3.1 x108CD3+ cells/kg (range 1.0–20.0) were infused. There was no association between the numbers of CD34+ and CD3+ cells in the transplanted peripheral blood stem cell graft (r=0.097, p=0.29). The dose of CD3+ cells infused correlated with the occurence of acute GvHD (aGvHD) II–IV (p=0.02) but not with the development of chronic GvHD (cGvHD). The risk of chronic or acute GvHD was not different between patients receiving more than the 75. percentile (p75) of CD34+ cells (>8x106cells/kg) compared to those receiving < p75 CD34+ cells. In multivariate analysis of all leukemia patients, acute GvHD, chronic GvHD and age were independent prognostic factors in OS. But in older patients (>50y), higher (>p75) CD34+ cell dose in the PB graft was associated with a trend to better OS at one year both in univariate (hazard ratio 0.508, 95% CI, 0.231 to 1.114, p=0.0908) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.521, 95% CI, 0.235 to 1.155, p=0.1084), while CD34+ cell dose did not have any impact in the OS of younger (<50y) patients. Univariate analysis of 104 patients with myeloid diseases revealed that patients sex, disease status at HCT, HLA match, or the preparative regimen (BuCy versus FBM) did not have any recognizable effect on OS, resulting in a 1-year survival of 65–70% in all analysed subgroups. Multivariate analysis showed that occurence of aGvHD was associated with significantly increased mortality in younger patients (BuCy treated, hazard ratio 3.287, 95% CI 1.126 to 9.596, p=0.03) as compared to FBM patients (hazard ratio 1.52, 95% CI 0.552 to 4.188, p=0.41). Relapse rates were lower in patients who experienced cGvHD as compared to those without cGvHD resulting in a significantly better OS (hazard ratio 0.276, 95%CI, 0.102 to 0.750, p=0.011). In conclusion the data show that in leukemia patients treated with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors, older patients receiving grafts with higher CD34+ cell counts show a trend to better survival, while in the same group FBM conditioning does not increase the treatment related mortality.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seied Asadollah Mousavi ◽  
Tahereh Rostami ◽  
Azadeh Kiumarsi ◽  
Amir Kasaeian ◽  
Mohammadreza Rostami ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only potentially curative treatment for acute leukemia. Many different parameters have significant impact on the final results of HSCT such as donor type, stem cell source, and the implemented conditioning regimen. In the absence of an HLA-matched related donor, unrelated donors or haploidentical donors are possible alternatives for patients with an indication to HSCT. In order to compare the outcomes of HSCT from different donor types, in this single-center study, using a radiation-free MAC regimen, we compared the results of unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from matched and mismatched related and unrelated donors with haploidentical donors in the children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA) affected by acute leukemia.MethodsIn this retrospective study, since 2014 to 2021, the outcome of CAYA patients with acute leukemia who had undergone peripheral blood T cell-replete HSCT from haploidentical donors versus unrelated donors (including 10/10 or 9/10 HLA-matched) versus related donors (including 10/10 or 9/10 HLA-matched) were evaluated. The HSCT was based on a radiation-free MAC regimen including Busulfan and Cyclophosphamide. The GvHD prophylaxis was based on the administration of Cyclosporine A in all patients, plus rabbit anti-human thymocytes globulins in unrelated and haploidentical donors and post transplantation cyclophosphamide in haploidentical donors. Adjusted multivariable proportional hazard Cox and competing risk analyses were performed.ResultsMedian follow up time was 28.7 months (95% CI: 21.9-34.9). Three-year overall survival rate (OS) and GvHD-free/relapse-free survival (GFRFS) rate was 68.81% (95% CI: 60.08%-76.01%) and 44.19% (95% CI: 35.52%-52.49%), respectively. Patients who had undergone HSCT from an unrelated donor had the lowest OS and GFRFS compared to other donor types. The 3-years NRM in all patients was 7.84% (95% CI 4.36-12.62). Adjusted multivariable modeling of OS showed that the hazard of death in patients who had undergone HSCT from an unrelated donor, was 3.6 times more than patients who underwent HSCT from their haploidentical donors (P=0.05). Likewise, the hazard of NRM after HSCT from unrelated donors was 6 times more than haploidentical donors (P=0.002). However, the relapse incidence was not significantly different between the two mentioned groups.ConclusionsIn this study, HSCT from haploidentical donors was associated with superior survival rates compared to HSCT from unrelated donors. So haploidentical peripheral blood derived HSCT could be a practical and valuable clinical option that offers CAYA patients with acute leukemia needing HSCT and lacking matched available donors, a reasonable opportunity for disease control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document