END-OF-LIFE CARE IN PATIENTS DYING OF GYNECOLOGIC CANCER

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilora Finlay
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 47-47
Author(s):  
Carolyn Lefkowits ◽  
Dio Kavalieratos ◽  
Janet Arida ◽  
Winifred Teuteberg ◽  
Heidi Donovan ◽  
...  

47 Background: Our objective was to describe gynecologic oncology (GO) providers’ and patients’ knowledge, attitudes and preferences related to utilization of specialist palliative care (SPC) for symptom management. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 19 GO providers (7 physicians, 7 advanced practice providers, 5 nurses) and 30 patients with advanced or recurrent gynecologic cancer from an academic medical center. Key interview domains include: patient symptoms, perceived role of oncology team regarding symptom management, familiarity with SPC, and barriers and facilitators to utilization of SPC for symptom management. Qualitative analysis is underway. Results: 19 provider interviews and 29 patient interviews were completed. Preliminary findings indicate shared beliefs between providers and patients, including an overall willingness to involve SPC in symptom management. Although providers felt comfortable initially managing common symptoms, they expressed interest in involving SPC for complex or multiple symptoms. Patients do not expect their GO providers to manage severe symptoms, noting concerns of complex symptom management as burdensome to the GO team. Barriers to involving SPC in symptom management included: patients’ perceptions of SPC as synonymous with end-of-life care, and logistical issues (e.g., scheduling and transportation). When a distinction was drawn between SPC for symptom management and end-of-life care, patients were uniformly open to seeing SPC for symptom management. Conclusions: GO patients’ and providers’ perception of the role of oncology providers in symptom management is consistent with the concept of a primary palliative care provider, delivering initial management of common symptoms. Specialty palliative care services are seen as complementary to the GO providers’ skillset and particularly useful for severe or multiple symptoms. Implications include the importance of ensuring that oncology provider training includes dedicated attention to symptom management to enable them to fulfill the role of primary palliative care provider.


Author(s):  
Lois M. Ramondetta ◽  
Maxine Grace de la Cruz ◽  
EdenMae C. Rodriguez

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa P. Díaz-Montes ◽  
Megan K. Johnson ◽  
Robert L. Giuntoli ◽  
Alaina J. Brown

Objectives: To assess the importance and desired timing of end-of-life care (EOLC) discussions among women with gynecologic cancer. Methods: A questionnaire related to EOLC issues was distributed to patients with gynecologic cancer. Answers were analyzed via SPSS using descriptive statistics. Contingency analysis was done to evaluate for differences among disease status and age regarding preferences for timing of discussions. Results: Patients expressed that addressing EOLC is an important part of their treatment. Most patients were familiar with advanced directives (73.0%), do not resuscitate/do not intubate (88.5%), and hospice (97.5%). Designating someone to make decisions was significantly related to disease status ( P = .03) and age ( P = 0.02). Conclusions: Patients are familiar with basic EOLC with optimal timing for discussions at disease progression or when treatment is no longer available.


2021 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. S317
Author(s):  
Katherine Hicks-Courant ◽  
Genevieve Kanter ◽  
Marilyn Schapira ◽  
Colleen Brensinger ◽  
Qing Liu ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Hinson ◽  
Aaron J. Goldsmith ◽  
Joseph Murray

This article addresses the unique roles of social work and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in end-of-life and hospice care settings. The four levels of hospice care are explained. Suggested social work and SLP interventions for end-of-life nutrition and approaches to patient communication are offered. Case studies are used to illustrate the specialized roles that social work and SLP have in end-of-life care settings.


Pflege ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-182
Author(s):  
Mandy Lohe ◽  
Manja Zimmermann ◽  
Christiane Luderer ◽  
Katharina Sadowski

Als Einrichtungen des Gesundheitswesens sind stationäre Hospize in Deutschland zur Qualitätssicherung und internen Qualitätsentwicklung verpflichtet. Die Bedeutung der Patientenzufriedenheit als einer der indirekten Indikatoren zur Beurteilung der Pflege- und Betreuungsqualität ist mittlerweile unumstritten. Eine subjektive Bewertung des Hospizes durch den Gast selbst birgt sowohl praktische als auch ethische Probleme. Eine Befragung der Angehörigen empfiehlt sich. Der vorliegende Artikel beschreibt die Entwicklung eines Instruments zur Evaluation stationärer Hospize aus der Sicht hinterbliebener Angehöriger. Mit dessen Hilfe soll die Frage, wie Angehörige die Begleitung und Pflege beurteilen, die ihnen sowie ihrem verstorbenen Familienmitglied durch das Hospiz zuteil wurde, beantwortet werden. Die Konstruktion der Fragen erfolgte auf Basis bestehender Konzepte zum Assessment der end-of-life care und einer Analyse aller identifizierten Instrumente zur Evaluation stationärer Hospize aus der Perspektive hinterbliebener Angehöriger. Die Fragebogenentwicklung umfasste neben der umfassenden Literaturrecherche die Bildung eines Itempools, die Itemauswahl, die kritische Diskussion der Fragen im Expertenkreis sowie einen standardisierten und kognitiven Pretest. Entstanden ist ein fünfdimensionaler Fragebogen, der physische, psychologische, soziale, spirituelle und versorgungsorganisatorische Aspekte der end-of-life care integriert. Das Instrument umfasst 53 Items in Form überwiegend geschlossener Fragen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document