scholarly journals P-0059 is Radiofrequency Ablation is Effective for Metachronous Liver Metastasis from Gastric Cancer?

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. iv47-iv48
Author(s):  
Jun-Eul Hwang ◽  
Dae-Eun Kim ◽  
Shim Hyun-Jeong ◽  
Woo-Kyun Bae ◽  
Sang-Hee Cho ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 030006052094050
Author(s):  
Kezhong Tang ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Linping Dong ◽  
Lantian Wang ◽  
Zhe Tang

Objective To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus liver resection and chemotherapy for liver metastases from gastric cancer. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 50 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy and local treatments for liver metastases (RFA, n = 20; liver resection, n = 20; and chemotherapy, n = 10) from 2008 to 2018. Results The short- and long-term outcomes of each local treatment were evaluated. The median overall survival (OS) after RFA was similar to that after liver resection (20 vs. 20 months, respectively) and longer than that after chemotherapy (20 vs. 10 months, respectively). The 3-year OS and progression-free survival (PFS) rates after RFA were 20% and 10%, respectively, while those in the liver resection group were 23.5% and 23.5%, respectively. The 3-year OS rate after chemotherapy was 10%. The size and number of metastases were prognostic factors for patients with gastric cancer with liver metastasis without statistical significance. Conclusions Among patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer, OS and PFS were satisfactory and comparable between RFA and liver resection but better than those of chemotherapy. RFA is an appropriate option for patients with gastric cancer who have a solitary liver metastasis measuring ≤3.0 cm.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 2349-2356
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiang Fan ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Meiwu Zhang ◽  
Dafeng Mao ◽  
Haitao Jiang

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4108-4108
Author(s):  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Noriko Yamamoto ◽  
Akio Saiura ◽  
Takeshi Sano ◽  
Keisho Chin ◽  
...  

4108 Background: Trastuzumab is the 1st molecular targeting drug in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer that has been shown to confer overall survival benefit adding to chemotherapy. In breast cancer it has been already used long time, it is known that there are the discordance of its target; HER2 between primary and metastatic site. Although molecular targeting drugs as Trastuzumab are expected to control the metastatic disease, molecular status is usually evaluated in the primary site because metastatic sites are difficult to biopsy. In this study we attempted to compare HER2 and its related molecular status, which have interaction each together, between primary and paired liver metastatic sites in gastric cancer. Methods: Total 58 consecutive cases with gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection of primary site and synchronous or metachronous liver metastasis were examined. HER2, EGFR, c-MET and IGF-1R status were evaluated by immunohistochemistry(IHC) in primary and paired liver metastasis. HER2 expression by IHC using HercepTest (DAKO) were assessed according to Gastric Cancer Scoring System. On the other molecular expression by IHC, positive expression was defined as 25% or more staining with intensity 2 or 3+. We analyzed the concordance of their expression in both sites. Results: The patient cohort consists predominantly of male (78%), with Lauren’s diffuse (37%) and intestinal tumors (62%). Fifty three percent of cases were synchronous liver metastasis. The positive rate of primary and paired liver metastatic sites were 10.3%, 8.6% in HER2, 1.7%, 5.1% in EGFR, 44.8%, 31.0% in c-MET and 31.0%, 29.3% in IGF-1R. The concordance between primary and paired liver metastatic sites were 91.3%, 93.1%, 75.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. Conclusions: Our data suggested that in HER2 and EGFR the concordance between primary and metastatic site were high, other hands the concordance of c-MET and IGF-1R were relatively low. It might be necessary to rebiopsy to estimate the expression of c-MET and IGF-1R in gastric cancer.


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 837-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michihiro Ishida ◽  
Shinji Morita ◽  
Makoto Saka ◽  
Takeo Fukagawa ◽  
Hirokazu Taniguchi ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1075-1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu Sato ◽  
Tadashi Nishimaki ◽  
Kazutoshi Date ◽  
Yoshio Shirai ◽  
Isao Kurosaki ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33
Author(s):  
PAOLO AURELLO ◽  
ANDREA MINERVINI ◽  
MARCO PACE ◽  
FRANCESCO D’ANGELO ◽  
GIUSEPPE NIGRI ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
In Ja Park ◽  
Hee Cheol Kim ◽  
Chang Sik Yu ◽  
Pyo Nyun Kim ◽  
Hyung Jin Won ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 701-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Chen ◽  
Z. Tang ◽  
X. Dong ◽  
S. Gao ◽  
H. Fang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document