P666 Comparative in vitro activity of tigecycline against ICU-and non-ICU isolates offive clinically important Gram-negative pathogens: results of the German T.E.S.T.Surveillance Programme 2005

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S158-S159
Author(s):  
M. Kresken ◽  
J. Brauers ◽  
H. Geiss ◽  
E. Halle ◽  
E. Leitner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Negative

scholarly journals 1375. In vitro Activity of Cefiderocol and Comparator Agents against Gram-Negative Isolates from Cancer Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S421-S422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth V I Rolston ◽  
Bahgat Gerges ◽  
Issam Raad ◽  
Samuel L Aitken ◽  
Ruth Reitzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) are now the predominant cause of bacterial infection in cancer patients (CP). Many GNB are problematic because they have become resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Cefiderocol (CFDC), a novel siderophore cephalosporin, is active against a wide spectrum of GNB. We evaluated its in vitro activity and that of eleven comparator agents against GNB isolated from CP. Methods A total of 341 recent GNB blood isolates from CP were tested using CLSI approved methods for MIC determination by broth microdilution. Comparator agents were amikacin (A), aztreonam (AZ), ceftazidime (CZ), ceftazidime/avibactam (CAV), cefepime (CEF), ciprofloxacin (CIP), colistin (CL), meropenem (MR), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), tigecycline (TG), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (T/S). Results CFDC MIC90s as mg/L were: S. maltophilia [50 isolates] 0.25, E. coli (ESBL−) [50 isolates] 0.5, E. coli (ESBL+) [51 isolates] 2.0, K. pneumoniae (ESBL− and +) [60 isolates] 0.5; K. pneumoniae (CRE) [22 isolates] 2.0; P. aeruginosa (MDR) [32 isolates] 1.0; E. cloacae [27 isolates] 4.0; Achromobacter spp. [15 isolates] 0.12. CFDC inhibited P. agglomerans, Burkholderia spp., Sphingomonas spp., Ochrobactrum spp. at ≤1 mg/L [23 total isolates] and Elizabethkingia spp. and R. radiobacter at ≤8 mg/L [11 total isolates]. Among comparator agents, only T/S had consistent activity against S. maltophilia. For E. coli (ESBL− and +) MR, TG, CAV, CL were most active. For K. pneumoniae (ESBL–and +) MR, CAV were most active. For K. pneumoniae (CRE) and P. aeruginosa (MDR), none of the comparators had significant activity. For E. cloacae, MR, A, CAV, TG were most active. Among the uncommon organisms, MR and TG had the greatest activity. Conclusion Although susceptibility breakpoints have yet to be determined, CFDC has significant activity (≤4 mg/L) against most problematic Gram-negative organisms causing infections in CP based on available pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data. In particular, its activity against S. maltophilia was superior to the comparators. Also, it was the most active agent against P. aeruginosa (MDR) and K. pneumoniae (CRE). Based on our results, CFDC warrants clinical evaluation for the treatment of blood stream infections caused by GNB in CP. Disclosures K. V. I. Rolston, Merck: Investigator, Research grant; JMI Laboratories: Investigator, Research grant; Shionogi (Japan): Investigator, Research grant. B. Gerges, Shionogi: Collaborator, Research support. S. L. Aitken, Shionogi: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Merck: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Medicines Co: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Achaogen: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; Zavante: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; R. Prince, Shionogi: Investigator, Research support. Merck: Investigator, Research support.

scholarly journals Cefepime/sulbactam as an enhanced antimicrobial combination therapy for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W Wareham ◽  
M H F Abdul Momin ◽  
Lynette M Phee ◽  
Michael Hornsey ◽  
Joseph F Standing
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Ratio ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Pharmacodynamic Modelling ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Combination Regimens

Abstract Background β-Lactam (BL)/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations are widely used for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. Cefepime has not been widely studied in combination with BLIs. Sulbactam, with dual BL/BLI activity, has been partnered with very few BLs. We investigated the potential of cefepime/sulbactam as an unorthodox BL/BLI combination against MDR Gram-negative bacteria. Methods In vitro activity of cefepime/sulbactam (1:1, 1:2 and 2:1) was assessed against 157 strains. Monte Carlo simulation was used to predict the PTA with a number of simulated cefepime combination regimens, modelled across putative cefepime/sulbactam breakpoints (≤16/≤0.25 mg/L). Results Cefepime/sulbactam was more active (MIC50/MIC90 8/8–64/128 mg/L) compared with either drug alone (MIC50/MIC90 128 to >256 mg/L). Activity was enhanced when sulbactam was added at 1:1 or 1:2 (P < 0.05). Reduction in MIC was most notable against Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacterales (MIC 8/8–32/64 mg/L). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling highlighted that up to 48% of all isolates and 73% of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii with a cefepime/sulbactam MIC of ≤16/≤8 mg/L may be treatable with a high-dose, fixed-ratio (1:1 or 1:2) combination of cefepime/sulbactam. Conclusions Cefepime/sulbactam (1:1 or 1:2) displays enhanced in vitro activity versus MDR Gram-negative pathogens. It could be a potential alternative to existing BL/BLI combinations for isolates with a cefepime/sulbactam MIC of 16/8 mg/L either as a definitive treatment or as a carbapenem-sparing option.

scholarly journals In Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Activities of DW-224a, a New Fluoronaphthyridone

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 2261-2264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Soo Park ◽  
Hyun-Joo Kim ◽  
Min-Jung Seol ◽  
Dong-Rack Choi ◽  
Eung-Chil Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibacterial Activities ◽  
The Other ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria

ABSTRACT DW-224a showed the most potent in vitro activity among the quinolone compounds tested against clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria. Against gram-negative bacteria, DW-224a was slightly less active than the other fluoroquinolones. The in vivo activities of DW-224a against gram-positive bacteria were more potent than those of other quinolones.

In vitro activity of BAL9141 against clinical isolates of gram-negative bacteria

2004 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas C. Issa ◽  
Mark S. Rouse ◽  
Kerryl E. Piper ◽  
Walter R. Wilson ◽  
James M. Steckelberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Negative

In Vitro Activity of Gepotidacin Against Gram-negative and Gram-positive Anaerobes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith A. Hackel ◽  
James A. Karlowsky ◽  
Michele A. Canino ◽  
Daniel F. Sahm ◽  
Nicole E. Scangarella-Oman
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Agar Dilution

Gepotidacin (formerly GSK2140944) is a first in class triazaacenaphthylene antibacterial currently in Phase III clinical trials. When tested against Gram-negative ( n =333) and Gram-positive ( n =225) anaerobes by agar dilution, gepotidacin inhibited 90% of isolates (MIC 90 ) at concentrations of 4 and 2 μg/ml, respectively. Given gepotidacin’s in vitro activity against the anaerobic isolates tested, further study is warranted to better understand gepotidacin’s utility in the treatment of infections caused by clinically relevant anaerobic organisms.

scholarly journals In vitro activity of tigecycline against 313 Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Maioli ◽  
Erika Coppo ◽  
Ramona Barbieri ◽  
Elisabetta Canepa ◽  
Laura Gualco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Cefepime against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, Viridans Group Streptococci andStreptococcus pneumoniaefrom a Cross-Canada Surveillance Study

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald E Low ◽  
Joyce de Azavedo ◽  
Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network ◽  
Ross Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Surveillance Study ◽  
National Committee ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Resistance Rates ◽  
Viridans Group Streptococci

OBJECTIVE: To determine the in vitro activity of cefepime against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci obtained from an ongoing cross-Canada surveillance study.DESIGN: Clinical isolates of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli with inducible and constitutive chromosomally mediated cephalosporinases, viridans group streptococci andStreptococcus pneumoniaewere collected from laboratories serving hospitals, nursing homes and physician offices in the community from across Canada during 1996 and 1997. Laboratories were asked to submit only clinically relevant nonduplicate isolates for susceptibility testing. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out on all isolates of Gram-negative and viridans group streptococci.S pneumoniaewere characterized as penicillin susceptible, intermediately resistant or highly resistant. Nonsusceptible isolates were defined as being intermediately or highly resistant (minimal inhibitory concentrations [MIC] greater than 0.06 mg/L). Only isolates ofS pneumoniaethat were nonsusceptible to penicillin were selected for further study. MICs were determined using a microbroth dilution technique according to the National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standards.RESULTS: A total of 727 Gram-negative bacilli samples were collected. No resistance to cefepime was detected withCitrobacter freundii,Serratia marcescens,Morganella morganiiandEnterobacterspecies. Of these strains,Enterobacterspecies andC freundiiwere the most resistant to ceftazidime, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone with MIC90Sof 32 mg/L or greater and resistance rates of 6% or greater. Resistance rates ofPseudomonas aeruginosaandAcinetobacterspecies to cefepime were 4.8% and 3%, respectively. The two organisms had similar rates of resistance to ceftazidime. Less than 3% of the Gram-negative bacilli were resistant to imipenem and meropenem. There were 153 viridans group streptococci, of which 22 (14.4%) were resistant to penicillin. Of 1287S pneumoniaesamples, 193 (15%) were nonsusceptible to penicillin. Cefepime, ceftriaxone and cefotaxime had comparable activity against all isolates of viridans group streptococci andS pneumoniae.CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against Gram-negative bacilli with inducible and constitutive chromosomally mediated cephalosporinases, and had equal or superior activity versus comparator beta-lactams against all isolates of viridans group streptococci andS pneumoniae.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document