P0439 CUTANEOUS MANIFESTATIONS OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS AND OVERLAP SYNDROME. EXPERIENCE AND RESULTS IN OUR AUTOINMUNE DISEASES CLINIC

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S148-S149
Author(s):  
Inmaculada Paez ◽  
Silvia Quattrino ◽  
Ester Ortiz ◽  
Carmen Manzano ◽  
Begoña Pérez ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1041.1-1041
Author(s):  
V. Agarwal ◽  
S. Kakati ◽  
P. Debbaruah

Background:SNP rs7574865, located within the third intron of STAT4 gene at chromosome 2, has been associated with susceptibility to SLE among different ethnic groups.1,2 Interestingly, we recently have documented an association between this gene and susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Indian population.3Objectives:To determine whether the STAT4 (rs7574865) SNP is associated with clinical and immunological manifestations in SLE.Methods:The study was carried out on 100 unrelated SLE (SLICC criteria 2012) patients from North-East India. Genotyping of STAT4 rs7574865 SNP was done using Taqman probe and Real-Time Polymerase chain reaction. An association study was performed between the alleles and genotypes of STAT4 rs7574865 with the clinical and immunological manifestations included in the SLE SLICC classification criteria. For all analysis, the statistical significance was fixed at 5% level of significance (p < 0.05).Results:The mean duration of illness was 2.69±2.55 years. Cases and Controls remained in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.The occurrence of Photosensitivity and hyperpigmentation was significantly higher in TT genotype group (97.22% and 77.77%, respectively) with p <0.001 in each case.SLE patients with nephritis (Albuminuria >500mg/24 hours) and elevated serum creatinine were both significantly higher in TT genotype group as compared to GT and GG (p< 0.001 and p=0.001 respectively).The Anti-dsDNA antibody was significantly associated with TT genotype (p <0.001).Conclusion:Our study provides evidence regarding the association between STAT4 rs7574865 gene polymorphism is risk factor for cutaneous manifestations, Lupus nephritis and Anti ds-DNA positivity in SLE. So, our findings reinforce the need for further association studies including prospective studies with larger subjects in order to replicate such findings.References:[1]Graham RR, Ph D, Hom G, Ph D, Behrens TW, Bakker PIW De, et al. and the Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(10):977–86.[2]Yuan H, Feng JB, Pan HF, Qiu LX, Li LH, Zhang N, et al. A meta-analysis of the association of STAT4 polymorphism with systemic lupus erythematosus. Mod Rheumatol. 2010;20(3):257–62.[3]Gupta V, Kumar S, Pratap A, Singh R, Kumari R, Kumar S, et al. Association of ITGAM, TNFSF4, TNFAIP3 and STAT4 gene polymorphisms with risk of systemic lupus erythematosus in a North Indian population. Lupus. 2018;27(12):1973–9.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
GABRIEL PACÍFICO SEABRA NUNES ◽  
PATRÍCIA DA SILVA CUNHA NOEL ◽  
SIMONE FERREIRA DE CASTRO BOTILEIRO ◽  
SANDRA LÚCIA EUZÉBIO RIBEIRO

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 260
Author(s):  
Luke J Maxfield ◽  
Laura S Tanner ◽  
Chelsea Schwartz

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-system disease with a myriad of mucocutaneous and systemic findings. One of the atypical cutaneous manifestations is palisaded neutrophilic granulomatous dermatitis (PNGD). This uncommon condition presents as tender or asymptomatic, flesh-colored, red to violaceous subcutaneous nodules. The diagnosis may be suspected clinically but is confirmed by biopsy. The impact of the disease may be the direct result of pain, psychosocial, cosmetic concerns, or be the initial presentation of an underlying systemic disease. We present a patient with known SLE who developed PNGD. We also review similar clinical and microscopic disease entities with a summative comparison of neutrophilic dermatoses in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Elizabeth E. Cooper ◽  
Catherine E. Pisano ◽  
Samantha C. Shapiro

Lupus, Latin for “wolf,” is a term used to describe many dermatologic conditions, some of which are related to underlying systemic lupus erythematosus, while others are distinct disease processes. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus includes a wide array of visible skin manifestations and can progress to systemic lupus erythematosus in some cases. Cutaneous lupus can be subdivided into three main categories: acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Physical exam, laboratory studies, and histopathology enable differentiation of cutaneous lupus subtypes. This differentiation is paramount as the subtype of cutaneous lupus informs upon treatment, disease monitoring, and prognostication. This review outlines the different cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus and provides an update on both topical and systemic treatment options for these patients. Other conditions that utilize the term “lupus” but are not cutaneous lupus erythematosus are also discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 232-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa Afzali ◽  
Anna Isaeian ◽  
Peyman Sadeghi ◽  
Bobak Moazzami ◽  
Nima Parvaneh ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) accounts for about 10%-20% of all patients with SLE. Deficiencies in early complement components of the classical pathway are the strong genetic risk factor for the development of SLE. In this study, clinical and laboratory manifestations of both complement-deficient and normal complement pSLE patients were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To investigate clinical and immunological manifestations of pSLE in Iran, 36 consecutive pSLE patients (onset before 18 years) who were followed up over a period of 2 years, were studied. Complement C1q and C2 levels were measured using radial immunodifusion assay and complement C3 and C4 levels were measured using nephelometry. Medical records were retrospectively evaluated from patient database of Children Medical Center Hospital. Data were assessed through descriptive analysis (confidence interval = 95%), paired t-test, and Pearson correlation test. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (58%) had at least one component of complement deficiency. Ten patients (27%) had low C1q level, 11 patients (30.5%) had low C2, nine patients (25%) had low C3, and four patients (11%) had low C4 level. Serum level of complement in pSLE was significantly lower than the control group, except C4 (P = 0.005). The low C1q patients had an earlier age of onset of disease (P < 0.0001). The cutaneous manifestations were more frequent and much more severe in pSLE with low complement (100% vs. 73%). The frequency of renal and musculoskeletal symptoms was equal, but renal morbidity was more common in pSLE with low complement. Positivity for anti-ds-DNA was less common in pSLE with low complement (71% vs. 86%). CONCLUSION: In pSLE patients with early disease onset and more aggressive SLE manifestations and negative anti-ds-DNA test, complement deficiency should be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document