Change in trend in various clinic o-pathological factors and treatment profile of breast cancer patients in developing countries: A tertiary cancer center experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. S94-S95
Author(s):  
S. Sharma ◽  
S. Kumar ◽  
S. Jain ◽  
R. Dana ◽  
K. Rastogi ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12034-e12034
Author(s):  
Omar Peña-Curiel ◽  
María Alejandra Garza-Ledezma ◽  
Héctor Díaz-Pérez ◽  
Bertha Alejandra Martinez-Cannon ◽  
Mauricio Canavati-Marcos ◽  
...  

e12034 Background: The use of scalp cooling devices (SCD) has been widely adopted for prevention against chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). However, efficacy of SCD varies between different chemotherapy (CT) regimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of SCD in breast cancer patients with different CT regimens treated in a tertiary cancer center in Monterrey, Mexico. Methods: All consecutive patients who used SCD were included. Data regarding treatment regimens and efficacy outcomes were prospectively collected. A descriptive analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness among the different CT regimens and sequences used. Results: We included a total of 49 patients with SCD usage from July 2016-January 2019. Table summarizes SCD efficacy, toxicities and CT regimens. In our study, 76% of patients had grade ≤1 CIA using SCD. 35% withdrew SCD use, with hair loss being the most common reason. 58% of patients who received upfront anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) experienced grade 2 CIA. In contrast, no patients receiving taxane-only treatment had grade 2 CIA. Notably, only 3 of 16 patients (19%) who received upfront paclitaxel followed by anthracyclines developed grade 2 CIA. Conclusions: SCD proved to be highly effective in preventing grade 2 CIA with different CT regimens, including patients that received anthracycline-based regimens who started treatment with taxanes upfront. Accordingly, our results suggest that CT sequence, rather than type of CT agent may have a significant impact on the efficacy of SCD in CIA prevention. The results of larger studies are required to confirm our findings.[Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153473542098391
Author(s):  
Chieh-Ying Chin ◽  
Yung-Hsiang Chen ◽  
Shin-Chung Wu ◽  
Chien-Ting Liu ◽  
Yun-Fang Lee ◽  
...  

Background Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming more common in medical practice, but little is known about the concurrent use of CAM and conventional treatment. Therefore, the aim was to investigate the types of CAM used and their prevalence in a regional patient cohort with breast cancer (BC). Methods BC patients were interviewed with a structured questionnaire survey on the use of CAM in southern Taiwan at an Integrative Breast Cancer Center (IBCC). The National Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) classification was used to group responses. Over a period of 8 months, all patients receiving treatment for cancer at the IBCC were approached. Results A total of 106 BC patients completed the survey (response rate: 79.7%). The prevalence of CAM use was 82.4%. Patients who were employed, were receiving radiotherapy and hormone therapy, and had cancer for a longer duration were more likely to use CAM ( P < .05). Multivariate analysis identified employment as an independent predictor of CAM use (OR = 6.92; 95% CI = 1.33-36.15). Dietary supplementation (n = 69, 82.1%) was the type of CAM most frequently used, followed by exercise (n = 48, 57.1%) and traditional Chinese medicine (n = 29, 34.5%). The main reason for using CAM was to ameliorate the side effects of conventional therapies. Almost half (46.4%) of these CAM users did not disclose that they were using it in medical consultations with their physicians. Most chose to use CAM due to recommendations from family and friends. Conclusion A large portion of BC patients at the IBCC undergoing anti-cancer treatment courses used CAM, but less than half discussed it with their physicians. Given the high prevalence of CAM, it would be justifiable to direct further resources toward this service so that cancer patients can benefit from a holistic approach to their treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18687-e18687
Author(s):  
Maya Leiva ◽  
Angela Pennisi ◽  
Kathleen Kiernan Harnden ◽  
Patricia Conrad Rizzo ◽  
Lauren Ann Mauro

e18687 Background: The long-acting injectable G-CSF, pegfilgrastim and its biosimilars have historically been given to patients 24 hours following the administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy for either primary or secondary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN). Previous literature has indicated that pegfilgrastim administration prior to 24 hours post chemotherapy, may result in a deepened and prolonged neutropenia due to the increase in circulating granulocytes exposed to chemotherapy. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and to reduce potential SAR-CoV-2 exposure to cancer patients on therapy, we implemented same day administration of injectable pegfilgrastim-cbqv among select breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens from March 2020 – February 2021. Methods: Utilizing retrospective EHR chart reviews, 55 patients among 4 medical oncologists in our breast cancer group were identified as meeting the criteria of same day pegfilgrastim-cbqv administration. Inclusion was based on completion of at least 2 consecutive cycles of same day pegfilgrastim-cbqv 6 mg subcutaneous injection for primary or secondary prophylaxis. The selected patient charts were reviewed for the incidence and severity of FN. Among the patients who had documented FN, further subgroup analyses were done regarding baseline characteristics, timing of neutropenia, regimens, regimen sequence, and reported ADRs associated with pegfilgrastim-cbqv. Results: 9 (16.4%) of the 55 patients experienced FN (Grades 3-4) and 6 (10.9%) patients were hospitalized. There were no Grade 5 events and none had therapy discontinued due to FN. 8 (88.9%) of the patients experienced FN between cycles 1 and 2. Of note, there were no cases of COVID-19 among the 9 patients who had an episode of FN. 52 (94.5%) of the 55 patients received treatment with curative intent and 3 (5.5%) had metastatic disease on a subsequent line of therapy. The median age was 49.1 years (range 29-71) and patients were 56.4% Caucasian, 18.1% Black or African American, 12.7% Asian, and 12.7% Hispanic/Latina. Conclusions: Based on the retrospective data analysis, same day pegfilgrastim-cbqv appears to be a safe and effective option in the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN with myelosuppressive standard of care chemotherapy used in breast cancer treatment. Though our review was limited by a relatively small sample size and confined to younger (49.1 median age) breast cancer patients, this opens the door to further re-evaluation of same day pegfilgrastim-cbqv administration in other patient populations. In a post pandemic treatment world, this slight change in practice has the potential to reduce patient financial toxicity associated with multiple medical visits, provide an alternative to on-body injector formulations, and ensure treatment adherence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document