Impact of health systems strengthening on coverage of maternal health services in Rwanda, 2000–2010: a systematic review

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (39) ◽  
pp. 50-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice Bucagu ◽  
Jean M. Kagubare ◽  
Paulin Basinga ◽  
Fidèle Ngabo ◽  
Barbara K Timmons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Maternal Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Maternal Health Services ◽  
Health Systems Strengthening

Maternal health services in China’s western rural areas: uptake and correlates

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengfang Liu ◽  
Linxiu Zhang ◽  
Yaojiang Shi ◽  
Huan ZHOU ◽  
Alexis Medina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Maternal Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Uptake Rate ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Maternal Health Services ◽  
Western China ◽  
Public Health Systems

Purpose Many public health systems have struggled with the dual questions of (1) why the uptake rate of maternal health services is low among some subpopulations; and (2) how to raise it. The objective of this study is to assess the uptake rate of a new set of maternal health services in poor rural areas of China. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is based on the survey responses of women’s representatives and village cadres from almost 1000 villages in June 2012 as part of a wide-scale public health survey in Sichuan, Gansu and Yunnan provinces in the western part of China. Findings We find that the uptake rate of maternal health services (including in-hospital delivery, antenatal care visits and post-partum care visits) in poor rural areas of western China are far below average in China, and that the rates vary across provinces and ethnic groups. Our analyses demonstrate that distance, income, ethnicity and availability appear to be systematically correlated with low uptake rates of all maternal health services. Demand-side factors seem to be by far the most important sources of the differences between subpopulations. We also find that there is potential for creating a Conditional Cash Transfer program to improve the usage of maternal health services. Originality/value We believe that our results will contribute positively to the exploration of answers to the dual questions that many public health systems have struggled with (1) why the uptake rate of maternal health services is low among some subpopulations; and (2) how to raise it.

scholarly journals Cost of maternal health services in low and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e027822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas ◽  
Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde ◽  
Oluwasola Banke-Thomas ◽  
Adamu Maikano ◽  
Charles Anawo Ameh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Maternal Health ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Maternal Health Services ◽  
Maternal Health Service ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Health Service Provision ◽  
Middle Income Countries

IntroductionThere is substantial evidence that maternal health services across the continuum of care are effective in reducing morbidities and mortalities associated with pregnancy and childbirth. There is also consensus regarding the need to invest in the delivery of these services towards the global goal of achieving Universal Health Coverage in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there is limited evidence on the costs of providing these services. This protocol describes the methods and analytical framework to be used in conducting a systematic review of costs of providing maternal health services in LMICs.MethodsAfrican Journal Online, CINAHL Plus, EconLit, Embase, Global Health Archive, Popline, PubMed and Scopus as well as grey literature databases will be searched for relevant articles which report primary cost data for maternal health service in LMICs published from January 2000 to June 2019. This search will be conducted without implementing any language restrictions. Two reviewers will independently search, screen and select articles that meet the inclusion criteria, with disagreements resolved by discussions with a third reviewer. Quality assessment of included articles will be conducted based on cost-focused criteria included in globally recommended checklists for economic evaluations. For comparability, where feasible, cost will be converted to international dollar equivalents using purchasing power parity conversion factors. Costs associated with providing each maternal health services will be systematically compared, using a subgroup analysis. Sensitivity analysis will also be conducted. Where heterogeneity is observed, a narrative synthesis will be used. Population contextual and intervention design characteristics that help achieve cost savings and improve efficiency of maternal health service provision in LMICs will be identified.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this review. The plan for dissemination is to publish review findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present findings at high-level conferences that engage the most pertinent stakeholders.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018114124

Health systems factors influencing maternal health services: a four-country comparison

Health Policy ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Oliver Parkhurst ◽  
Loveday Penn-Kekana ◽  
Duane Blaauw ◽  
Dina Balabanova ◽  
Kirill Danishevski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Maternal Health Services ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Country Comparison

Measuring and analysing social efficiency in the production of maternal health services in Mexico, 2008–15

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 889-899
Author(s):  
Fato Fene ◽  
Edson Serván-Mori ◽  
Miguel Ángel Mendoza ◽  
Carlos Chivardi ◽  
Hortensia Reyes-Morales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Structural Characteristics ◽  
Decomposition Analysis ◽  
Maternal Health Services ◽  
Social Efficiency ◽  
Spatial Autoregressive ◽  
Concentration Patterns

Abstract ‘Social efficiency’ (SE) denotes the capacity of health systems to ensure equitable access to quality health services at no financial risk to users. Mexico and other low- and middle-income countries have rarely studied the performance of their health systems from an SE perspective. We propose a metric for assessing SE in the production of maternal health services in the public sector among populations without social security, analysing contextual correlates of the demand for these services. Analysis was based on administrative data collected from the 243 health jurisdictions (HJs) in Mexico for the period 2008–15. We defined production inputs as the availability of physical and human resources and social product as the unweighted sum of social sub-products, including an equitable distribution of maternal health resources, the provision of quality maternal health care and financial protection for users. We described the SE scores, the main contextual characteristics as well as those related to the demand for maternal health services. We then performed a variance decomposition analysis of the SE score by component and estimated the SE territorial concentration patterns. Finally, we identified the structural characteristics modelling SE by means of a spatial autoregressive panel data model with fixed effects by year. The SE score rose from 57.7% in 2008 to 71.9% in 2015 (P < 0.01), with its quality component accounting for the largest proportion of variance (30%). SE peaked in HJs with low social marginalization and rurality, and with service demand characterized by low parity and older populations. Different SE levels demonstrated territorial concentration patterns. Analysing SE as a metric for health system performance offers elements that contribute to the achievement of UHC as well as to the design and implementation of effective maternal health interventions intended particularly for the most socially vulnerable sectors of the population.

scholarly journals Cost of Utilising Maternal Health Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas ◽  
Francis Ifeanyi Ayomoh ◽  
Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde ◽  
Oluwasola Banke-Thomas ◽  
Ejemai Amaize Eboreime ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Maternal Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Maternal Health Services ◽  
Maternal Health Service ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Cost Drivers ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Background: Cost is a major barrier to maternal health service utilisation for many women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, comparable evidence of the available cost data in these countries is limited. We conducted a systematic review and comparative analysis of costs of utilising maternal health services in these settings. Methods: We searched peer-reviewed and grey literature databases for articles reporting cost of utilising maternal health services in LMICs published post-2000. All retrieved records were screened and articles meeting the inclusion criteria selected. Quality assessment was performed using the relevant cost-specific criteria of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. To guarantee comparability, disaggregated costs data were inflated to 2019 US dollar equivalents. Total adjusted costs and cost drivers associated with utilising each service were systematically compared. Where heterogeneity in methods or non-disaggregated costs was observed, narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings. Results: Thirty-six studies met our inclusion criteria. Many of the studies costed multiple services. However, the most frequently costed services were utilisation of normal vaginal delivery (22 studies), caesarean delivery (13), and antenatal care (ANC) (10). The least costed services were post-natal care (PNC) and post-abortion care (PAC) (5 each). Studies used varied methods for data collection and analysis and their quality ranged from low to high with most assessed as average or high. Generally, across all included studies, cost of utilisation progressively increased from ANC and PNC to delivery and PAC, and from public to private providers. Medicines and diagnostics were main cost drivers for ANC and PNC while cost drivers were variable for delivery. Women experienced financial burden of utilising maternal health services and also had to pay some unofficial costs to access care, even where formal exemptions existed. Conclusion: Consensus regarding approach for costing maternal health services will help to improve their relevance for supporting policy-making towards achieving universal health coverage. If indeed the post-2015 mission of the global community is to "leave no one behind," then we need to ensure that women and their families are not facing unnecessary and unaffordable costs that could potentially tip them into poverty.

scholarly journals e-income countries from a provider’s perspective: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e002371
Author(s):  
Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas ◽  
Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde ◽  
Francis Ifeanyi Ayomoh ◽  
Oluwasola Banke-Thomas ◽  
Ejemai Amaize Eboreime ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Maternal Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Economies Of Scale ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Health Economic Evaluation ◽  
Maternal Health Services ◽  
Personnel Cost

IntroductionMaternal health services are effective in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with pregnancy and childbirth. We conducted a systematic review on costs of maternal health services in low-income and middle-income countries from the provider’s perspective.MethodsWe searched multiple peer-reviewed databases (including African Journal Online, CINAHL Plus, EconLit, Popline, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) and grey literature for relevant articles published from year 2000. Articles meeting our inclusion criteria were selected with quality assessment done using relevant cost-focused criteria of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. For comparability, disaggregated costs data were inflated to 2019 US$ equivalents. Costs and cost drivers were systematically compared. Where heterogeneity was observed, narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings.ResultsTwenty-two studies were included, with most studies costing vaginal and/or caesarean delivery (11 studies), antenatal care (ANC) (9) and postabortion care (PAC) (8). Postnatal care (PNC) has been least costed (2). Studies used different methods for data collection and analysis. Quality of peer-reviewed studies was assessed average to high while all grey literature studies were assessed as low quality. Following inflation, estimated provision cost per service varied (ANC (US$7.24–US$31.42); vaginal delivery (US$14.32–US$278.22); caesarean delivery (US$72.11–US$378.940; PAC (US$97.09–US$1299.21); family planning (FP) (US$0.82–US$5.27); PNC (US$5.04)). These ranges could be explained by intercountry variations, variations in provider type (public/private), facility type (primary/secondary) and care complexity (simple/complicated). Personnel cost was mostly reported as the major driver for provision of ANC, skilled birth attendance and FP. Economies of scale in service provision were reported.ConclusionThere is a cost savings case for task-shifting and encouraging women to use lower level facilities for uncomplicated services. Going forward, consensus regarding cost component definitions and methodologies for costing maternal health services will significantly help to improve the usefulness of cost analyses in supporting policymaking towards achieving Universal Health Coverage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document