Organic matter and concentrated nitrogen removal by shortcut nitrification and denitrification from mature municipal landfill leachate

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 647-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-jun ZHANG ◽  
Yong-zhen PENG ◽  
Shu-ying WANG ◽  
Shu-wen ZHENG ◽  
Jin GUO
1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Diamadopoulos ◽  
P. Samaras ◽  
X. Dabou ◽  
G. P. Sakellaropoulos

A study was undertaken to examine the feasibility of biologically treating a combined waste stream of landfill leachate and municipal sewage. The ratio of sewage to leachate was 9 to 1 by volume. The combined waste had an average BOD5 430 mg/l, COD 1090 mg/l, and TKN 133 mg/l (80% of which was in the form of ammonia). A laboratory-scale sequencing batch activated sludge reactor was used to carry comparative performance evaluations of biological treatment, including nitrification and denitrification. The SBR reactor was operating in daily time cycles employing the following sequential operation phases: filling phase, anoxic phase, aeration reaction phase, settling phase, and drain phase. In particular, the anoxic and aeration periods were tailored in order to develop conditions conducive to desired nitrification and denitrification. During the reaction period, the process was operated under an extended aeration mode with the MLSS concentration being around 3500 mg/l. The results indicated that successful biotreatment of combined leachate and sewage was possible, with the treated effluent being low in BOD5 and COD. The system was capable of BOD5 removal efficiencies exceeding 95%. Furthermore, nitrate removal during the anoxic phase was approximately 99% due to denitrification. However, the overall nitrogen removal during a full cycle was about 50%. The inclusion of an anoxic period right after the aeration phase enhanced the nitrogen removal efficiency, yet this phase required the addition of an external carbon source to the reactor due to the low concentration of biodegradable carbon, and at the same time the process became less efficient in BOD removal.


2007 ◽  
Vol 146 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 81-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daekeun Kim ◽  
Hong-Duck Ryu ◽  
Man-Soo Kim ◽  
Jinhyeong Kim ◽  
Sang-Ill Lee

2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 2403-2410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-hoon Im ◽  
Hae-jin Woo ◽  
Myung-won Choi ◽  
Ki-back Han ◽  
Chang-won Kim

2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 1749-1755 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ruscalleda ◽  
H. López ◽  
R. Ganigué ◽  
S. Puig ◽  
M. D. Balaguer ◽  
...  

The anammox process was applied to treat urban landfill leachate coming from a previous partial nitritation process. In presence of organic matter, the anammox process could coexist with heterotrophic denitrification. The goal of this study was to asses the stability of the anammox process with simultaneous heterotrophic denitrification treating urban landfill leachate. The results achieved demonstrated that the anammox process was not inactivated by heterotrophic denitrification. Moreover, part of the nitrate produced by anammox bacteria and part of the influent nitrite were removed by heterotrophic denitrifiers with associated biodegradable organic matter consumption. In this sense, the contribution on nitrogen removal of each process was calculated using a nitrogen mass balance methodology. An 85.1±5.6% of the nitrogen consumption was achieved via anammox process while the average heterotrophic denitrifiers contribution was 14.9±5.6%. Heterotrophic denitrification was limited by the available easily biodegradable organic matter.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1480-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina WU ◽  
Chengyao PENG ◽  
Shujun ZHANG ◽  
Yongzhen PENG

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document