Effects of Vasopressin on MPFC-Amygdala Circuitry during Fearful Face Processing in Humans

NeuroImage ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S184
Author(s):  
C.F. Zink ◽  
L. Kempf ◽  
S. Hakimi ◽  
C.A. Rainey ◽  
J.L. Stein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Face Processing ◽  
Fearful Face

scholarly journals Reduced early fearful face processing during perceptual distraction in high trait anxious participants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna‐Lena Steinweg ◽  
Sebastian Schindler ◽  
Maximilian Bruchmann ◽  
Robert Moeck ◽  
Thomas Straube
Keyword(s):  
Face Processing ◽  
Fearful Face ◽  
High Trait

scholarly journals Red background facilitates low spatial frequency fearful face processing in groups with high autistic tendency

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 24d
Author(s):  
Eveline Mu ◽  
Laila Hugrass ◽  
David P Crewther
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Face Processing ◽  
Fearful Face

scholarly journals Impact of Oxytocin on the neural correlates of fearful face processing in PTSD related to childhood Trauma

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1606626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julianne C. Flanagan ◽  
Lauren M. Sippel ◽  
Megan M. Moran Santa Maria ◽  
Karen J. Hartwell ◽  
Kathleen T. Brady ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Childhood Trauma ◽  
Face Processing ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Fearful Face

scholarly journals Intersubject variability in fearful face processing: the linkbetween behavior and neural activation

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1438-1453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy J. Doty ◽  
Shruti Japee ◽  
Martin Ingvar ◽  
Leslie G. Ungerleider
Keyword(s):  
Face Processing ◽  
Neural Activation ◽  
Intersubject Variability ◽  
Fearful Face

scholarly journals A Distinct Neurophenotype of Fearful Face Processing in Alcohol Use Disorder With and Without Comorbid Anxiety

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 2212-2224
Author(s):  
Nicole MacIlvane ◽  
Samantha J. Fede ◽  
Emma E. Pearson ◽  
Nancy Diazgranados ◽  
Reza Momenan
Keyword(s):  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Face Processing ◽  
Alcohol Use Disorder ◽  
Comorbid Anxiety ◽  
Fearful Face

scholarly journals Differential activation of fusiform gyrus during fearful face processing in schizophrenia

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Panayiota Michalopoulou ◽  
Lucy Morley ◽  
Gabrielle Samson ◽  
Owen O' Daly ◽  
Vincent Giampietro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Face Processing ◽  
Fusiform Gyrus ◽  
Differential Activation ◽  
Fearful Face

Differential activation of the amygdala and the ‘social brain’ during fearful face-processing in Asperger Syndrome

2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Ashwin ◽  
Simon Baron-Cohen ◽  
Sally Wheelwright ◽  
Michelle O’Riordan ◽  
Edward T. Bullmore
Keyword(s):  
Asperger Syndrome ◽  
Face Processing ◽  
Social Brain ◽  
Differential Activation ◽  
Fearful Face ◽  
The Social

Face Inversion Effect Emerges Under Critical Configural Discrepancy

2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jisien Yang ◽  
Adrian Schwaninger
Keyword(s):  
Face Recognition ◽  
Face Processing ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Inversion Effect ◽  
Configural Processing ◽  
Major Contributor ◽  
Face Inversion Effect ◽  
Configural Information ◽  
Face Inversion ◽  
The Face

Configural processing has been considered the major contributor to the face inversion effect (FIE) in face recognition. However, most researchers have only obtained the FIE with one specific ratio of configural alteration. It remains unclear whether the ratio of configural alteration itself can mediate the occurrence of the FIE. We aimed to clarify this issue by manipulating the configural information parametrically using six different ratios, ranging from 4% to 24%. Participants were asked to judge whether a pair of faces were entirely identical or different. The paired faces that were to be compared were presented either simultaneously (Experiment 1) or sequentially (Experiment 2). Both experiments revealed that the FIE was observed only when the ratio of configural alteration was in the intermediate range. These results indicate that even though the FIE has been frequently adopted as an index to examine the underlying mechanism of face processing, the emergence of the FIE is not robust with any configural alteration but dependent on the ratio of configural alteration.

Concurrent Electrodermal and Eyeblink Conditioning With Masked and Unmasked Stimuli

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
José Luis Marcos ◽  
Azahara Marcos
Keyword(s):  
Unconditioned Stimulus ◽  
Strong Evidence ◽  
Eyeblink Conditioning ◽  
Noise Burst ◽  
Conditioning Phase ◽  
Contingency Awareness ◽  
Blank Screen ◽  
Neutral Face ◽  
Fearful Face

Abstract. The aim of this study was to determine if contingency awareness between the conditioned (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) is necessary for concurrent electrodermal and eyeblink conditioning to masked stimuli. An angry woman’s face (CS+) and a fearful face (CS−) were presented for 23 milliseconds (ms) and followed by a neutral face as a mask. A 98 dB noise burst (US) was administered 477 ms after CS+ offset to elicit both electrodermal and eyeblink responses. For the unmasking conditioning a 176 ms blank screen was inserted between the CS and the mask. Contingency awareness was assessed using trial-by-trial ratings of US-expectancy in a post-conditioning phase. The results showed acquisition of differential electrodermal and eyeblink conditioning in aware, but not in unaware participants. Acquisition of differential eyeblink conditioning required more trials than electrodermal conditioning. These results provided strong evidence of the causal role of contingency awareness on differential eyeblink and electrodermal conditioning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document