Is a Single Patient Identifier Key to EHR System?

2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (15) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
DEBORAH LEVENSON
Keyword(s):  
1967 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Miller ◽  
Arthur F. Niemoeller

Results of intelligibility tests on a single patient with a severe discrimination loss for speech are reported. The patient was tested with four different hearing aids and with no aid, and the effects of opportunity for lipreading, background noise, and reverberation were evaluated. The tests appear to allow an accurate estimate of the amount of help to be expected in various situations and show that an aid with good fidelity is clearly superior to the others tested. The destructive effects of background noise and reverberation are demonstrated separately and in combination.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 2310-2318
Author(s):  
David S. Shulman ◽  
Lulla V. Kiwinda ◽  
Stacey Edwards ◽  
Catherine M. Clinton ◽  
Sarah Hunt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110346
Author(s):  
Antonio Gidaro ◽  
Francesco Casella ◽  
Francesca Lugli ◽  
Chiara Cogliati ◽  
Maria Calloni ◽  
...  

Background: Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) through MicroBubbles Time (MBT) (time from infusion of saline with addition of micro-bubbles of air to visualization of first bubbles in right atrium (RA), visualized by subxiphoid or apical echocardiography) is an alternative to Intracavitary ECG and chest X-ray in evaluation of tip location in central venous catheters. Objective: To evaluate feasibility and variability of CEUS in peripheral catheters (Midline-MC) in a cohort of patients and in a subgroup where tip location was also performed through chest X-ray. Secondary outcomes were verifying the correlation between MBT and distance between tip of MC and RA (anthropometric and radiological measures), body mass index (BMI), vein diameter at point of insertion. Methods: Patients with insertion of MC were enrolled in this prospective cohort. After catheter insertion, CEUS was performed recording MBT. Results: One hundred thirty-two MCs were inserted, 45 performed Chest X-ray. MBT wasn’t feasible in 7 (5%) because of low quality echocardiographic images. Subcostal view was available in 114 patients (91.2%), while 11 patients (8.8%) were examined through apical four-chamber view. Mean MBT in the whole population was 2.3 ± 0.8 s. Significant correlation between anthropometric and radiological measures, BMI and MBT was found. 32.8% of MC had a MBT ⩽2 s. Conclusions: CEUS could be useful to estimate tip position. Our study showed how 2 s is not a suitable cutoff to confirm central catheter’s tip.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott E. Janus ◽  
Brian D. Hoit

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document