Is there enough evidence to justify clinical trials on patent foramen ovale closure to relieve migraines?

2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (20) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Andrew Dowson ◽  
Hans-Christoph Diener
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Carnero Montoro ◽  
M Ruiz Ortiz ◽  
N Paredes Hurtado ◽  
M Delgado Ortega ◽  
A Rodriguez Almodovar ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background and aims Since september 14th, 2017. Three large clinical trials demonstrated that, in selected patients, percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) was associated with lower recurrence in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS). Our aim was to determine the impact of these findings on routine  clinical practice in a tertiary hospital. Methods Patients with percutaneous closure of PFO due to CS (January 2001-January 2020) were included. The clinical characteristics were analyzed individually and grouped in the RoPE score, before and after the publication date. Complex anatomy (CA) defined as interatrial septum aneurysm or basal wide bubble passage was evaluated in both periods. Results 293 patients were included. The mean age was 49 ± 11 years, 15% were older than 60 years, 60% men, 26% hypertensive, 28% smokers and 7%diabetics. The median RoPEscore was 6 [p25-75, 5-7] and 75% met CA criteria. Since september 14th, 2017, the frequency of CA and the mean age of the patients were significantly higher (89% vs. 69% p <0.0005 and 51 ± 11 vs. 48 ± 11 years, p = 0.02, respectively), and RoPEscore, significantly lower (5 [5-7] vs. 6 [5-7], p = 0.02). Conclusion The publication of clinical trials wich demonstrated the benefit of percutaneous closure of PFO in CS had a significant impact on the daily clinical practice of our institution, with an increase in indications for CA, despite a clinical profile suggestive of lower causal probability of PFO.


2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stewart J. Tepper ◽  
Catalina Cleves ◽  
Frederick R. Taylor

2018 ◽  
Vol 107 (9) ◽  
pp. 788-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brunilda Alushi ◽  
Alexander Lauten ◽  
Salvatore Cassese ◽  
Roisin Colleran ◽  
Stefanie Schüpke ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. 575-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muthiah Vaduganathan ◽  
Arman Qamar ◽  
Ankur Gupta ◽  
Navkaranbir Bajaj ◽  
Harsh B. Golwala ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Stortecky ◽  
Stephan Windecker ◽  
◽  

Data from epidemiologic studies have indicated a close association between the presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke that is suggestive of paradoxical embolism as the underlying cause. Percutaneous closure of PFO has been proposed for the secondary prevention among patients suffering from paradoxical embolism. While observational data support this strategy, three randomized trials investigating percutaneous PFO closure with medical therapy have failed to detect a statistically significant reduction of the primary endpoint of recurrent ischemic cerebrovascular events, peripheral embolism, and death in the intention-to-treat analysis. Several reasons have been discussed as basis for the negative primary study results, including long recruitment rates, low number of recurrent events, and the use of different devices. In order to provide an answer to these unresolved factors, several meta-analyses have been published that have provided conflicting results. This article will review the available evidence of percutaneous PFO closure, will provide an overview on randomized clinical trials, and summarize the evidence from meta-analyses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document