383 First-in-human study of PF-04691502, a small molecule oral dual inhibitor of PI3K and mTOR in patients with advanced cancer: Preliminary report on safety and pharmacokinetics

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 121-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.D. Britten ◽  
A.A. Adjei ◽  
R. Millham ◽  
B. Houk ◽  
Z.A. Wainberg ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1888-1895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey I. Shapiro ◽  
Katherine M. Bell-McGuinn ◽  
Julian R. Molina ◽  
Johanna Bendell ◽  
James Spicer ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3099-TPS3099 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Lee ◽  
John D. Powderly ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Joshua Brody ◽  
Erika Paige Hamilton ◽  
...  

TPS3099 Background: Programmed-death 1 (PD-1) and V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA) are independent immune checkpoints that negatively regulate T-cell function and are implicated in various malignancies. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that dual blockade of these pathways is synergistic. CA-170 is a first-in-class oral small molecule that directly targets both PD-1/PD-L1 and VISTA pathways and has shown anti-tumor activity in multiple preclinical models. Methods: The dose escalation phase has a target enrollment of 50 pts with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas onto escalating doses; the first four single-pt cohorts are accelerated titration but then switch to 3+3 design. The dose expansion phase has a target enrollment of 250 pts with select tumor types known to be responsive to anti-PD-1/L1 inhibitors and/or known to express PD-L1 or VISTA. Key eligibility criteria include: age ≥ 18 years, ECOG ≤1, adequate organ function, and ineligible for/did not respond to standard therapy including anti-PD-1/L1 inhibitors, where available. Primary objectives of this first-in-human study: safety, maximum tolerated dose, and recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary objectives: pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-tumor activity. Exploratory endpoints: biomarkers and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects, which include changes in immune cell and peripheral cytokine populations in tumor (IHC/mRNA) and blood (flow cytometry/mRNA). Oral CA-170 is administered once daily in 21-day cycles. Response will be evaluated every other cycle per RECIST (v1.1) and Immune-related Response Criteria or by Cheson criteria (2007). Patients who discontinue treatment for reasons other than progressive disease will be followed for progression-free survival. Serial plasma, blood, and tumor samples will be collected for PK and PD evaluation. Clinical trial identifier: Clinical trial information: NCT02812875.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 510-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn D. Britten ◽  
Alex A. Adjei ◽  
Robert Millham ◽  
Brett E. Houk ◽  
Gary Borzillo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 575-575
Author(s):  
Carolyn D. Britten ◽  
Alex A. Adjei ◽  
Robert Millham ◽  
Brett E. Houk ◽  
Gary Borzillo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A420-A420
Author(s):  
Timothy Yap ◽  
Deborah Wong ◽  
Siwen Hu-Lieskovan ◽  
Kyriakos Papadopoulos ◽  
Michelle Morrow ◽  
...  

BackgroundUpregulation of immune checkpoints, such as LAG-3, plays an important role in promoting resistance to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Targeting PD-L1 and LAG-3 using a bispecific antibody may overcome resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade.1 We report initial data from a first-in-human study evaluating FS118 in patients with advanced cancer and resistance to PD-(L)1 therapy.MethodsThe ongoing Phase I FIH study (NCT03440437) is being conducted to evaluate safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, PK/PD and clinical activity of FS118 administered IV weekly to heavily pre-treated patients who had previously received anti-PD-(L)1 therapy for a minimum of 12 weeks. Adverse events were assessed using CTCAEv4.03 and tumor responses assessed using RECISTv1.1 and iRECIST. Single subject dose escalation cohorts were followed by a 3+3 ascending dose design. Three cohorts (3, 10, 20 mg/kg) were expanded to evaluate PK, PD and clinical activity. Pharmacodynamic studies examined soluble LAG-3 production and peripheral T-cell expansion.ResultsForty-three patients (median 6 lines of prior therapy, including ICB) with solid tumors received FS118 at doses from 0.8 mg up to 20 mg/kg across 8 dose levels. Weekly administration of FS118 was well tolerated and did not result in dose- or treatment-limiting toxicities. An MTD was not reached. No safety signals unexpected for the drug class of immune-checkpoint inhibitors were identified in the early study population. The majority (95%) of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) considered by the Safety Review Committee (SRC) to be treatment-related were Grade 1 and 2. Grade 3 TEAEs toxicities (elevated liver enzymes) were observed in 2 patients (5%). No SAEs or deaths were attributed to FS118 treatment. Anti-drug antibodies, observed in half of patients, were typically transient in nature. The pharmacokinetic profile confirmed preclinical predictions and PD parameters included a dose-dependent increase in serum soluble LAG-3 and expansion of peripheral T cells. Long-lasting disease stabilisation (>6 months) was observed in a subset of patients with acquired resistance (defined as a CR, PR or SD ≥3 months on previous PD-(L)1 treatment), but not in patients with primary resistance. Two patients remain on FS118 treatment as of 2 Jul 2020 (duration 10 and 16 months). Retrospective IHC analysis of PD-L1 and LAG-3 co-expression in the tumor was assessed as a potential biomarker associated with clinical outcome.ConclusionsWeekly treatment with FS118 was well tolerated up to 20 mg/kg and was associated with pharmacodynamic markers of FS118 activity. Encouraging signs of clinical activity were observed in highly pre-treated patients who had acquired resistance to prior PD-(L)1 therapy.Trial RegistrationRegistered at www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03440437ReferenceKraman M, Faroudi M, Allen N, Kmiecik K, Gliddon D, Seal C, Koers A, Wydro M, Winnewisser J, Young L, Tuna M, Doody J, Morrow M, Brewis N. FS118, a bispecific antibody targeting LAG-3 and PD-L1, Enhances T-Cell activation resulting in potent antitumor activity. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:3333–3344.


2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 1502-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. U. GRAEFE-MODY ◽  
U. SCHUHLY ◽  
K. RATHGEN ◽  
H. STAHLE ◽  
J. M. LEITNER ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document