Oxidative base damage to DNA: specificity of base excision repair enzymes

2000 ◽  
Vol 462 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Cadet ◽  
Anne-Gaëlle Bourdat ◽  
Cédric D'Ham ◽  
Victor Duarte ◽  
Didier Gasparutto ◽  
...  
DNA Repair ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidia V. Starostenko ◽  
Nadejda I. Rechkunova ◽  
Natalia A. Lebedeva ◽  
Alexander A. Lomzov ◽  
Vladimir V. Koval ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Mendez ◽  
Margarita Sandigursky ◽  
William A. Franklin ◽  
Mark K. Kenny ◽  
Raichal Kureekattil ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 156 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Weinfeld ◽  
A. Rasouli-Nia ◽  
M. A. Chaudhry ◽  
R. A. Britten

DNA Repair ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 1270-1280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takanori Sugimoto ◽  
Emi Igawa ◽  
Haruna Tanihigashi ◽  
Mayumi Matsubara ◽  
Hiroshi Ide ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 112 (12) ◽  
pp. 1887-1894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorne J. Hofseth ◽  
Mohammed A. Khan ◽  
Mark Ambrose ◽  
Olga Nikolayeva ◽  
Meng Xu-Welliver ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (20) ◽  
pp. 11227-11243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Namrata Kumar ◽  
Sripriya Raja ◽  
Bennett Van Houten

Abstract The six major mammalian DNA repair pathways were discovered as independent processes, each dedicated to remove specific types of lesions, but the past two decades have brought into focus the significant interplay between these pathways. In particular, several studies have demonstrated that certain proteins of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER) pathways work in a cooperative manner in the removal of oxidative lesions. This review focuses on recent data showing how the NER proteins, XPA, XPC, XPG, CSA, CSB and UV-DDB, work to stimulate known glycosylases involved in the removal of certain forms of base damage resulting from oxidative processes, and also discusses how some oxidative lesions are probably directly repaired through NER. Finally, since many glycosylases are inhibited from working on damage in the context of chromatin, we detail how we believe UV-DDB may be the first responder in altering the structure of damage containing-nucleosomes, allowing access to BER enzymes.


Mutagenesis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matilde Clarissa Malfatti ◽  
Giulia Antoniali ◽  
Marta Codrich ◽  
Silvia Burra ◽  
Giovanna Mangiapane ◽  
...  

Abstract Alterations of DNA repair enzymes and consequential triggering of aberrant DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are thought to play a pivotal role in genomic instabilities associated with cancer development, and are further thought to be important predictive biomarkers for therapy using the synthetic lethality paradigm. However, novel unpredicted perspectives are emerging from the identification of several non-canonical roles of DNA repair enzymes, particularly in gene expression regulation, by different molecular mechanisms, such as (i) non-coding RNA regulation of tumour suppressors, (ii) epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of genes involved in genotoxic responses and (iii) paracrine effects of secreted DNA repair enzymes triggering the cell senescence phenotype. The base excision repair (BER) pathway, canonically involved in the repair of non-distorting DNA lesions generated by oxidative stress, ionising radiation, alkylation damage and spontaneous or enzymatic deamination of nucleotide bases, represents a paradigm for the multifaceted roles of complex DDR in human cells. This review will focus on what is known about the canonical and non-canonical functions of BER enzymes related to cancer development, highlighting novel opportunities to understand the biology of cancer and representing future perspectives for designing new anticancer strategies. We will specifically focus on APE1 as an example of a pleiotropic and multifunctional BER protein.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document