Basket clinical trial design for targeted therapies for cancer: a French National Authority for Health statement for health technology assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. e430-e434
Author(s):  
Etienne Lengliné ◽  
Julien Peron ◽  
Antoine Vanier ◽  
François Gueyffier ◽  
Serge Kouzan ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Chang ◽  
Kathleen R. Lamborn ◽  
John G. Kuhn ◽  
W.K. Alfred Yung ◽  
Mark R. Gilbert ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asaf Maoz ◽  
Koji Matsuo ◽  
Marcia A. Ciccone ◽  
Shinya Matsuzaki ◽  
Maximilian Klar ◽  
...  

Non-epithelial ovarian tumors are heterogeneous and account for approximately 10% of ovarian malignancies. The most common subtypes of non-epithelial ovarian tumors arise from germ cells or sex cord and stromal cells of the gonads. These tumors are usually detected at an early stage, and management includes surgical staging and debulking. When indicated for advanced disease, most respond to chemotherapy; however, options for patients with refractory disease are limited, and regimens can be associated with significant toxicities, including permanent organ dysfunction, secondary malignancies, and death. Targeted therapies that potentially decrease chemotherapy-related adverse effects and improve outcomes for patients with chemotherapy-refractory disease are needed. Here, we review the molecular landscape of non-epithelial ovarian tumors for the purpose of informing rational clinical trial design. Recent genomic discoveries have uncovered recurring somatic alterations and germline mutations in subtypes of non-epithelial ovarian tumors. Though there is a paucity of efficacy data on targeted therapies, such as kinase inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, immunotherapy, and hormonal therapy, exceptional responses to some compounds have been reported. The rarity and complexity of non-epithelial ovarian tumors warrant collaboration and efficient clinical trial design, including high-quality molecular characterization, to guide future efforts.


Author(s):  
O. V. Shtrimaitis ◽  
V. Ye. Dobrova

The aim of the work is to scientifically substantiate the basic aspects of developing a methodology for including сost-effectiveness analysis in key processes of clinical trials of medicines. Results. It is established that Ukrainian regulatory system and methodological support of clinical trials with included сost-effectiveness analysis is based on separate regulations in the field of clinical trial and health technology assessment. At the same time, there is no methodological support for the management of сost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials, which would take into account the peculiarities of planning, organizing and conducting such studies. The algorithm of substantiation, development and inclusion of basic components of the analysis of economic effectiveness in the basic processes of planning and the organization of clinical trial of medicines is offered. Emphasis is placed on the need for a proper strategy for analyzing the economic efficiency of the studied medical technologies in clinical trials. The importance of proper selection of economic evaluation models (cost minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit) in accordance with the purpose of the clinical trial, the primary hypothesis and the selected primary and secondary endpoints is determined. Conclusions. It is determined that there are certain problems of methodological and organizational nature for the development of clinical trials with included сost-effectiveness analysis and economic endpoints. The solution of these tasks should begin at the planning stage of the study by implementing the basic step-by-step recommendations. Innovative treatment technologies that have potential health benefits are often investigated in clinical trials. Thus, the introduction of pharmacoeconomic analysis methods into the structure of traditional clinical trials is an additional important tool to ensure the effective functioning and development of health technology assessment. In further research it is planned to develop scientific and practical approaches to ensure the proper implementation of management processes of сost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trial and analysis of data on their results. Keywords: clinical trials; health technology assessment; algorithms; economic models; procedures


2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidia Becla ◽  
Jeantine E. Lunshof ◽  
David Gurwitz ◽  
Tobias Schulte in den Bäumen ◽  
Hans V. Westerhoff ◽  
...  

Objectives: This article examines the challenges for health technology assessment (HTA) in the light of new developments of personalized health care, focusing on European HTA perspectives.Methods: Using the example of the Integrated Genome Research Network – Mutanom (IG Mutanom) project, with focus on personalized cancer diagnostics and treatment, we assess the scope of current HTA and examine it prospectively in the context of the translation of basic and clinical research into public health genomics and personalized health care.Results: The approaches developed within the IG-Mutanom project are based on innovative technology potentially providing targeted therapies for cancer; making translation into clinical practice requires a novel course of action, however. New models of HTA are needed that can account for the unique types of evidence inherent to individualized targeted therapies. Using constructive health technology assessment (CTA) models is an option, but further suitable models should be developed.Conclusions: Integrative, systems biology-based approaches toward personalized medicine call for novel assessment methods. The translation of their highly innovative technologies into the practice of health care requires the development of new HTA concepts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document