scholarly journals 947. Effects of Knockdown of the Coxsackievirus and Adenovirus Receptor (CAR) and/or αv Integrin Gene on Adenovirus Infection

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. S352-S353
2001 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 1001-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Koi ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Antonis Makrigiannakis ◽  
Spiro Getsios ◽  
Colin D. MacCalman ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Sharma ◽  
Abimbola Olayinka Kolawole ◽  
Sydney Marie Wiltshire ◽  
Kathleen Frondorf ◽  
Katherine Julie Diane Ashbourne Excoffon

Viruses are commonly investigated as vector systems for gene therapy. To be effective, virus-mediated gene-delivery systems require the presence of specific virus receptors to enter the target cell. One example is adenovirus and its primary receptor is the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR). Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells have become a choice model system for studying CAR and adenovirus infection due to their ability to polarize rapidly into an epithelium with high transepithelial resistance. We show here that, whilst MDCK cells are resistant to adenovirus infection and hence appear functionally CAR-deficient, polarized MDCK cells express significant levels of CAR sequestered on the basolateral surface, where it is inaccessible for virus infection. Thus, although a cell type may be resistant to adenovirus infection, it is impossible to know whether it is due to a deficiency, as both CAR absence and inaccessibility are barriers to adenovirus-mediated gene transfer.


1999 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 2559-2562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianghong Wang ◽  
Jeffrey M. Bergelson

ABSTRACT Coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) from which the cytoplasmic domain had been deleted and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored CAR lacking both transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains were both capable of facilitating adenovirus 5-mediated gene delivery and infection by coxsackievirus B3. These results indicate that the CAR extracellular domain is sufficient to permit virus attachment and entry and that the presence of a GPI anchor does not prevent infection.


2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (12) ◽  
pp. 6382-6386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter van't Hof ◽  
Ronald G. Crystal

ABSTRACT Membrane-proximal cysteines 259 and 260 in the cytoplasmic tail of the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) are known to be essential for the tumor suppression activity of CAR. We demonstrate that these residues provide an S-acylation motif for modification of CAR with the fatty acid palmitate. Substitution of alanine for cysteines 259 and 260 results in the additional localization of CAR in perinuclear compartments with no effect on the efficiency of adenovirus infection. The results indicate that palmitylation is important for stable plasma membrane expression and biological activity of CAR but is not critical for adenovirus receptor performance.


Gene Therapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 458-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Röger ◽  
T Pozzuto ◽  
R Klopfleisch ◽  
J Kurreck ◽  
S Pinkert ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 90 (12) ◽  
pp. 5601-5610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Pinkert ◽  
Carsten Röger ◽  
Jens Kurreck ◽  
Jeffrey M. Bergelson ◽  
Henry Fechner

ABSTRACTThe coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) and functions as a receptor for coxsackie B viruses (CVBs). The extracellular portion of CAR comprises two glycosylated immunoglobulin-like domains, D1 and D2. CAR-D1 binds to the virus and is essential for virus infection; however, it is not known whether D2 is also important for infection, and the role of glycosylation has not been explored. To understand the function of these structural components in CAR-mediated CVB3 infection, we generated a panel of human (h) CAR deletion and substitution mutants and analyzed their functionality as CVB receptors, examining both virus binding and replication. Lack of glycosylation of the CAR-D1 or -D2 domains did not adversely affect CVB3 binding or infection, indicating that the glycosylation of CAR is not required for its receptor functions. Deletion of the D2 domain reduced CVB3 binding, with a proportionate reduction in the efficiency of virus infection. Replacement of D2 with the homologous D2 domain from chicken CAR, or with the heterologous type C2 immunoglobulin-like domain from IgSF11, another IgSF member, fully restored receptor function; however, replacement of CAR-D2 with domains from CD155 or CD80 restored function only in part. These data indicate that glycosylation of the extracellular domain of hCAR plays no role in CVB3 receptor function and that CAR-D2 is not specifically required. The D2 domain may function largely as a spacer permitting virus access to D1; however, the data may also suggest that D2 affects virus binding by influencing the conformation of D1.IMPORTANCEAn important step in virus infection is the initial interaction of the virus with its cellular receptor. Although the role in infection of the extracellular CAR-D1, cytoplasmic, and transmembrane domains have been analyzed extensively, nothing is known about the function of CAR-D2 and the extracellular glycosylation of CAR. Our data indicate that glycosylation of the extracellular CAR domain has only minor importance for the function of CAR as CVB3 receptor and that the D2 domain is not essential per se but contributes to receptor function by promoting the exposure of the D1 domain on the cell surface. These results contribute to our understanding of the coxsackievirus-receptor interactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document