Abstract #247 Assessment of Disturbed Eating Behaviors Using Deps-R and its Relationship with Glycemic Control in Young Indian Type 1 Dm Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Vipan Talwar ◽  
Gourav Talwar ◽  
Shria Talwar ◽  
Rohit Kapoor
2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 325-325
Author(s):  
M. Marin Mayor ◽  
R.A. Codesal Julian ◽  
I. Fernandez ◽  
E. Verdura Vizcaino ◽  
N. Martinez Martin ◽  
...  

IntroductionDisturbed eating behaviors are a significant health concern among child and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) and are generally related to poor glycemic control, ketoacidosis, hospitalization and microvascular complications. Rates of eating problems among youths with DM1 have been reported to be as high as 38%.AimsTo review clinical characteristics, demographic profiles and risk factors for the development of eating disturbances among child and adolescents with DM1.MethodsWe performed a literature research of articles from 1980 until present, in which a Disturbed Eating Behavior appeared comorbid with DM1 in children and adolescents, using Medline database.ResultsAlmost all studies selected report a high prevalence of eating disturbances of child and adolescents with DM1 when compared with healthy pairs. This population trend to develop body image discontent and lower self-esteem. They are more likely to diet, skip meals, and omit insulin. All these practices have been associated with worsening diabetic medical complications and poorer psychological outcome.ConclusionsDue to the high prevalence and severe medical and psychological complications associated with disturbed eating behaviors among pediatric population with DM1, clinicians and school professionals may benefit from specialized training to identify the range of unhealthy weight control behaviors used by youths with DM1. Preventive programs that address disturbed eating behaviors should be provided for adolescents with DM1 in order to reduce the psychological and medical impact of this comorbid situation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 569-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena Stojanovic ◽  
Dragoslav Milosevic ◽  
Ilija Antovic ◽  
Goran Sekulic ◽  
Teodora Beljic-Zivkovic

Background/Aim. Despite of contemporary diabetes mellitus (DM) treatment, one half of patients do not achieve an optimal metabolic control. Considering great psychological burden of diabetic patients, the purpose of this study was to assess the effect of different insulin treatment regimens, glycemic control and the presence of vascular complications on self-reported well-being and quality of life (QoL) of subjects with type 1 DM. Methods. The patients with type 1 DM (n = 122) recruited from the outpatient Diabetes Endocrinology Clinic of Zvezdara University Medical Center were divided into 4 groups according to the specific treatment regimen: 26 were on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), 30 on conventional insulin therapy, 33 on multiple daily injections (MDI) with human insulins, and 33 on MDI with insulin analogues. QoL was assessed by self-reported well-being with the following questionnaires: WHO-5 item Well Being Index (WHO- 5), 36 item Short Form (SF-36) survey, and Insulin Treatment Appraisal Scale (ITAS). Objective metabolic control was assessed by glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid levels and the presence of vascular complications. Statistical analyses used in this crosssectional study included: descriptive statistics, Student?s t-test, Chisqare test, contingency tables, ANOVA and correlation methods. Results. The patients on CSII had significantly better metabolic control than all other treatment groups, especially when compared to the one on conventional therapy (CSII HbA1c 7.07 ? 1.48% vs conventional therapy, HbA1c 10.04 ? 1.44; p = 0.000). No significant difference in glycemic control was observed between patients on MDI with human insulins and insulin analogues. Good glycemic control significantly influenced the reported QoL. The patients with retinopathy and nephropathy reported significantly lower physical well-being, and the patients with polyneuropathy and cardiovascular complications reported also lower psychological well being. Conclusions. Insulin treatment regiment selection affects not only objective metabolic control, but also QoL.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
Elhashimi E. Hassan ◽  
Ehab A. M. Elagab ◽  
Hassan B Mohammed ◽  
Ahmed El-basher Abdelgader ◽  
Amar B. Elhussein ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Gold ◽  
Liam McGuirk ◽  
James Haigney ◽  
Jane Torres ◽  
Tara Patale ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Preliminary studies have demonstrated improvement in metabolic control of patients (PTs) using subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Monitoring systems (CGMs). In this study, we investigated the effect of CGMs on PTs’ glycemic control and compared the change in patient HbA1c levels between sensors. Objective: To determine how CGMs affect metabolic control in PTs and the effect of different sensors on glycemic control. Patients and Methods: 33 PTs with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) who began using a CGM between 2017 and 2019 were selected for inclusion. CGM systems used included DexcomG6™, DexcomG5™, DexcomG4™, Enlite™, Guardian 3™, or Medtronic Sure-T™ sensors. Results: The mean (MN) age of PTs at initial visit was 15.3 ± 5.1 yrs and the MN age at second visit was 15.8 ± 5.1 yrs. The MN time between visits was 5.0 ± 2.4 months (mos). 6 PTs had follow up (F/U) times less than 3 mos, 18 PTs had F/U times between 3 and 6 mos, 6 PTs had F/U times between 6 and 9 mos, and 3 PTs had F/U times greater than 9 mos. The MN and median (MD) HbA1c at the initial visit for all PTs was 8.28% ± 1.48 and 8.10%, respectively. The MN and MD HbA1c at final F/U for all PTs was 7.57% ± 1.11 and 7.50%, respectively. The difference in MN HbA1c was significant (p<0.001). The MN and MD HbA1c at the initial visit for PTs with a F/U time less than 3 mos was 7.55% ± 0.77 and 7.75%, respectively. The MN and MD HbA1c at F/U for these PTs was 7.20% ± 0.79 and 7.20%, respectively. The difference in MN HbA1c was significant (p<0.05). The MN and MD HbA1c at the initial visit for all PTs with a F/U time greater than 3 mos was 8.44% ± 1.53 and 8.10%, respectively. The MN and MD HbA1c at F/U for these PTs was 7.66% ± 1.15 and 7.50%, respectively. The difference in MN HbA1c was significant (p<0.001). The MN change of HbA1c between visits was not significant between PTs who had 3–6 mo, 6–9 mo, and 9+ mo F/U times (p=0.96) 15 PTs had HbA1c levels less than or equal to 8.0%. The MN and MD HbA1c at initial visit for these PTs was 7.20% ± 0.41 and 7.30%, respectively. The MN and MD HbA1c at F/U for these PTs was 6.75% ± 0.47 and 6.80%, respectively. The difference in MN HbA1c was significant (p<0.001). 20 PTs had HbA1c levels greater than 8.0% at initial visit. The MN and MD HbA1c at the initial visit for these PTs was 9.18% ± 1.47 and 8.80%, respectively. The MN and MD HbA1c at F/U for these PTs was 8.26% ± 1.03 and 8.00%, respectively. The difference in MN HbA1c was significant (p<0.001). The MN change in HbA1c between the high HbA1c group (-.92% ± 1.02) and low HbA1c group (-0.45% ± 0.32) was not significant (p>0.05). 25 PTs used a Dexcom™ sensor while 8 PTs used a Medtronic™ sensor. The MN change in HbA1c was not significant between these brands (p>0.05). Conclusion: CGMs improve metabolic control in pediatric PTs with Type 1 DM regardless of initial HbA1c. Further, this improved control is sustained over time. Sensor brands appear to be equally effective at achieving this goal.


Diabetes Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 869-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam H. Eisenberg Colman ◽  
Virginia M. Quick ◽  
Leah M. Lipsky ◽  
Katherine W. Dempster ◽  
Aiyi Liu ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 1637-1644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koen Luyckx ◽  
Margaux Verschueren ◽  
Nina Palmeroni ◽  
Eveline R. Goethals ◽  
Ilse Weets ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 376-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minke MA Eilander ◽  
Maartje de Wit ◽  
Joost Rotteveel ◽  
Henk Jan Aanstoot ◽  
Willie M Bakker-van Waarde ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1213-1219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Moraes Leao Peixoto ◽  
Nujen Colak Bozkurt ◽  
Shari Messinger ◽  
Maria Isabel Del Olmo García ◽  
Vincenzo Lauriola ◽  
...  

We evaluated whether 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) (GlycoMark®), a test for measuring postprandial glucose and glucose variability, could be a tool for assessing short-term glycemic control in islet cell transplant (ICT) subjects. Data of 21 subjects, with type 1 DM and allogenic islet transplantation, who had concomitant fructosamine, HbA1c, 1,5-AG ( n = 85 samples), and capillary glucose self-monitoring measurements ( n = 2,979) were analyzed retrospectively at different time points after ICT. A significant negative association was observed between 1,5-AG and HbA1c ( p = 0.02), but not with fructosamine. When HbA1c was divided in quartiles as <5.6, 5.6–5.9, 5.9–6.2, and >6.2, a decrease of an estimated 0.70 ± 0.30 μg/ml in 1,5-AG was associated with each quartile of increase in HbA1c ( p < 0.0001). There was a significant decline of 1.64 ± 0.3mg/dl in postprandial glucose values for each 1 unit increase in 1,5-AG ( p < 0.0001). For those with HbA1c ≥ 6.0% when 1,5-AG was ≥8.15 μg/ml, the mean estimated glucose level was 103.71 ± 3.66 mg/dl, whereas it was 132.12 ± 3.71 mg/ dl when 1,5-AG was <8.15 μg/ml. The glucose variability (Glumax - Glumin) in subjects with 1,5-AG <8.15 μg/ml was 46.23 mg/dl greater than the subjects with 1,5-AG ≥8.15 μg/ml (HbA1c ≥ 6.0%). There was no significant association between GlycoMark and glucose variability where HbA1c < 6%. 1,5-AG significantly associated with postprandial glucose levels and glucose variability in ICT recipients with near-normal HbA1c (6.0–6.5%) levels. These findings suggest that 1,5-AG can be used to differentiate those ICT subjects with higher glucose variability despite having near-normal HbA1c. However, prospective studies are needed to evaluate the association between GlycoMark levels and the parameters of graft dysfunction/failure.


Author(s):  
E. V. Globa ◽  
N. B. Zelinska

Introduction. Until recently, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has not been studied in children with different types of diabetes mellitus (DM). With the development of molecular genetics, new types of diabetes have been diagnosed, including neonatal (ND) and maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY), which usually require specific pathogenetic therapy, including sulfonylureas (SU), which improve glycemic control in patients with certain mutations. The aim of this study, which was conducted for the first time in Ukraine, was to analyze glycemic control in patients with different types of DM, including ND and MODY and changing their treatment after genetic testing. Materials and methods. We studied conducted the analysis of glycemic control in patients depending on the type of diabetes, namely: type 1 diabetes (n = 9282), type 2 diabetes (n = 23), ND (n = 16) with mutations KCNJ11, ABCC8 and MODY (n = 16) with mutations in HNF1A/HNF4A and ABCC8 genes. To confirm the nature of monogenic diabetes, targeting next-generation sequencing (tNGS) of all known neonatal and monogenic diabetes genes was performed. Results. According to the Register in 2018, in Ukraine the average age of children with type 1 DM was 11.5 ± 1.4 years, and the level of HbA1c was unsatisfactory (8.8 ± 2.01 %). The proportion of children who had ideal or optimal glycemic control (HbA1c


2011 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 15-16
Author(s):  
James Bonucchi ◽  
Kathy Lilli ◽  
Udaya Kabadi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document