S001: Which factors effect pain perception during prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia?

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. e1407-e1407a
Author(s):  
O. Yilmaz ◽  
S. Okcelik ◽  
F. Ates ◽  
H. Soydan ◽  
E. Malkoc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Pain Perception

Stereotactic robot-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia and sedation: moving robotic biopsy from operating theatre to clinic

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 767-772
Author(s):  
XinYan Yang ◽  
Alvin Yuanming Lee ◽  
Yan Mee Law ◽  
Allen Soon Phang Sim ◽  
Kae Jack Tay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Operating Theatre ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Transperineal Prostate Biopsy

Sectoral cancer detection and tolerability of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Ka-Fung Chiu ◽  
Ka-Lun Lo ◽  
Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh ◽  
Siu-Fai Ma ◽  
Chi-Ho Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Transperineal Prostate Biopsy

scholarly journals Evaluation of Complications of Intra-Prostatic Local Anaesthesia and Periprostatic Local Anaesthesia for Trus Guided Prostate Biopsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-86
Author(s):  
Am Anamur Rashid Choudhury ◽  
Md Waliul Islam ◽  
Md Golam Mowla Chowdhury ◽  
Tasmina Parveen ◽  
Parveen Sultana
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Visual Disturbance ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Objectives : To evaluate complications in Intra-prostatic local Anaesthesia and Periprostatic local Anaesthesia for TRUS Guided Prostate Biopsy. Methods: This study was carried out in the Department of Urology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka Medical College (DMCH) and Comfort Nursing Home, Dhaka during the period of January 2009 to October 2009, evaluate complications between periprostatic with intraprostatic local anaesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. For this purpose, a total number of 60 consecutive patients having increased prostate specific antigen (PSA >4.0ng/ml), abnormal DRE/transrectal ultrasound were admitted in the above mentioned hospitals were enrolled in this study for surgical management. Result : The age ranged from 50 to 90 years and the maximum number was found in the age group of 61-70 years in both groups. The mean(±SD) age was 68.5±7.5 years and 70.3±8.2 years in group I and group II respectively. No systemic lidocaine toxicity was observed in group II. But only dizziness were found in 2 cases (6.7%) and visual disturbance were found in 1 (3.3%) case respectively in group I. Urinary tract infection was found 2(6.7%) in group I and 1(3.3%) in group II patients. Hematuria was found 23(76.7%) in group I and 19(63.3%) in group II. Rectal bleeding was found 14(46.7%) in group I and 11(36.7%) in group II. The statistically not significant (p>0.05) between two groups in chi square and fisher exact test respectively. Conclusion : It is a simple and safe method that is less painful and it should be considered in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Complications wer4e less in intra-prostatic local anaesthesia than periprostatic local anaesthesia for TRUS guided prostate Biopsy. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 17, No. 2, July 2014 p.82-86

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document