New Rules for Embryo Research: Bill C-56 and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Stem Cell Research Guidelines

2002 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 722-726
Author(s):  
Josephine Johnston
2021 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-106493
Author(s):  
Monika Piotrowska

Human embryo models formed from stem cells—known as embryoids—allow scientists to study the elusive first stages of human development without having to experiment on actual human embryos. But clear ethical guidelines for research involving embryoids are still lacking. Previously, a handful of researchers put forward new recommendations for embryoids, which they hope will be included in the next set of International Society for Stem Cell Research guidelines. Although these recommendations are an improvement over the default approach, they are nonetheless unworkable, because they rely on a poorly conceived notion of an embryoid’s ‘potential’ to trigger stringent research regulations.


2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy C Wertz

Presents a study that examined the history, ethical debates and religious views regarding embryo and stem cell research in the U.S. Effect of the abortion debate on embryo research in the U.S.; Reason behind the reluctance of the federal government to fund therapeutic research; Role of the private sector in the development of embryo and stem cell research.


2002 ◽  
Vol 06 (07) ◽  
pp. 239-241

Rules on Transgenic Farm Products Take Effect in China. China Biotech Rules Scrutinized at WTO. China to Further Open Agricultural Market. Cosmetics from Mad Cow Disease Countries Banned in China. Japan Proposes New Agency for Food Safety. WHO Body Agrees on GM Food Safety Checks. NZ Websites Violate Medicine Act. Taiwan Health Department Releases Stem Cell Research Guidelines.


Author(s):  
Xiuqin SHEN ◽  
Feng PAN

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. For 40 years, international rules have limited human embryo research to the first 14 days of embryonic development. On May 26, 2021, in its latest guidelines for stem cell research and its medical applications, the International Society for Stem Cell Research eased the 14-day restriction. This raises myriad ethical issues. At their core is the debate over the moral status of embryos, which exposes ethical conflicts between cultural perspectives. This article discusses the moral status of embryos and argues from the perspective of Confucian ethics that the 14-day limit should not be waived at the present moment.


2001 ◽  
Vol 05 (21) ◽  
pp. 547-547

Hospitals Punished for Illegal Overcharging in China. Singapore to Stipulate Stem Cell Research Guidelines.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Doerflinger

The ethical debate on embryo research, particularly on whether to destroy human embryos for stem cell research, is sometimes said to involve a confrontation between religion and science. The claim is misleading at best. Ironically, religious claims have not infrequently been invoked by those who support human embryonic stem cell research, who have said that such research will enable us to “answer the prayers of America’s families” or present us with “the biblical power to cure.” And even religious organizations (as well as scientists and ethicists who share some of their concerns on this issue) have often made the case against the ethical acceptability of this research relying on science, and on general ethical considerations that transcend religious divisions. The Catholic Church, in particular, maintains that the ethical norm against directly taking the life of any innocent human being can be understood and embraced by people of good will, with or without religious faith, and that the application of this norm to the present controversy depends on an understanding of some basic facts about early human development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document