scholarly journals Right Bundle Branch Block Like Pattern Recorded in Right Ventricular Endocardial Pacing

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Ohnuki ◽  
Kazuhiko Miyataka ◽  
Takehiko Nakamura ◽  
Yoshinobu Ohnishi ◽  
Yoshizumi Kohnoike ◽  
...  
Heart India ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
MangalachulliPottammal Ranjith ◽  
Kalathingathodika Sajeer ◽  
ChakanalilGovindan Sajeev ◽  
Cicy Bastian ◽  
Vellani Haridasan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Vijay Yadav ◽  
Ratna Mani Gajurel ◽  
Chandra Mani Poudel ◽  
Hemant Shrestha ◽  
Surya Devkota ◽  
...  

Even though the left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology in the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) is expected after right ventricular endocardial pacing, the right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology may be paradoxically seen in around 8 to 10% of patients. The paced RBBB morphology should be given special attention in terms of safe RV pacing or septal and free wall perforation. Simple techniques such as moving the leads V1-2 to one interspace lower than standard (Klein maneuver) and combining frontal QRS axis between -30° to -90°, precordial transition point at or within V3, and absence of S wave in lead I as an algorithmic approach may correctly identify the pacemaker lead in right ventricle with high sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value.


Author(s):  
Phillip E Schrumpf ◽  
Michael Giudici ◽  
Deborah Paul ◽  
Roselyn Krupa ◽  
Cynthia Meirbachtol

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy has been shown to improve left ventricular performance in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and a left-sided interventricular conduction delay. This is performed by placing a pacing lead on the lateral left ventricular wall to stimulate the area normally stimulated by the left bundle branch. In patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB), pacing the right bundle branch could also result in resynchronization. Previous studies have shown that right ventricular outflow septal (RVOS) pacing does, in fact, utilize the native conduction system. Methods: 62 consecutive patients, 46 male/16 female, aged 75 +/− 10.5 yr, with RBBB and indications for pacing, underwent RVOS lead placement using commercially available pacing systems. The patients subsequently underwent bedside A-V optimization to achieve the narrowest QRS duration and most “normal” QRS complex. Echocardiography was performed to evaluate changes in wall motion comparing baseline with optimal pacing. Results: Baseline mean QRS duration 146 +/− 20.9 ms Optimized mean QRS duration 111 +/− 20.5 ms Average decrease in QRS duration -35 +/− 21.5 ms p < 0.001 Echocardiography demonstrated improvement in septal contraction abnormalities. Conclusions: 1) RVOS pacing in RBBB patients can significantly narrow the QRS complex on ECG. 2) Septal contraction abnormalities due to RBBB can be improved with RVOS pacing and optimal A-V timing. 3) Further studies are warranted to evaluate this therapy in a heart failure population.


1995 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuh Asano ◽  
Naomi Izumida ◽  
Koji Kiyohara ◽  
Junro Hosaki ◽  
Seiko Kawano ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document