scholarly journals Effects of Different Tillage Systems on Soil Properties, Root Growth, Grain Yield, and Water Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Arid Northwest China

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1286-1296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gao-bao HUANG ◽  
Qiang CHAI ◽  
Fu-xue FENG ◽  
Ai-zhong YU
2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.-Y. Jia ◽  
X.-L. Dai ◽  
H.-W. Men ◽  
M.-R. He

Jia, D.-Y., Dai, X.-L., Men, H.-W. and He, M.-R. 2014. Assessment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under alternate furrow irrigation in northern China: Grain yield and water use efficiency. Can. J. Plant Sci. 94: 349–359. Increasing water use efficiency (WUE) can improve agricultural production in the north of China, where there is little or no prospect for the expansion of water resources. A field experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) on the physiological response, grain yield, and WUE of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) over two successive growing seasons (2009/2010 and 2010/2011). The irrigation regimes were: W0, non-irrigated; W2, every furrow was irrigated at jointing and anthesis; W3, every furrow was irrigated before wintering and at jointing and grain filling; and AFI, where one of the two neighboring furrows was alternately irrigated before wintering and at grain filling, and every furrow was irrigated during jointing. Our results indicate that the rate of plant transpiration and soil evaporation during grain filling were lower with AFI than when using W3. A reduced biological yield and increased harvest index were achieved under AFI compared with treatment W3. No difference in grain yield was observed between AFI and W3. The photosynthetic WUE, irrigation WUE, and WUE were all higher with AFI than with W3. Therefore, AFI is suggested as an appropriate irrigation schedule that achieves acceptable grain yields and allows for reductions in irrigation water consumption.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46
Author(s):  
Hazzar Habbib ◽  
Bertrand Hirel ◽  
Fabien Spicher ◽  
Frédéric Dubois ◽  
Thierry Tétu

2000 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. T. Gan ◽  
G. P. Lafond ◽  
W. E. May

Changing economic conditions have provided strong incentives for grain producers to choose the most profitable cereal crops to grow. We determined grain yield and water use efficiency (WUE) for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), fall rye (Secale cereale L.), hard red spring (HRS) wheat, Canada prairie spring (CPS) wheat, amber durum (Triticum turgidum L.), and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under no-till systems. Over 60% of yield variability existing among site/years was due to water use or evapotranspiration (ET) in semiarid east-central Saskatchewan. Mean grain yield increased by 16.3 kg ha−1 with each millimetre of increase in ET. Barley produced 3748 kg ha−1 of grain on average, or 21% higher than winter wheat, 27% higher than CPS wheat, 39% higher than rye or durum, and 50% higher than HRS wheat. Average yields differed less than 5% between winter wheat and CPS wheat, but in water-stressed environments, CPS wheat had 19 to 34% lower grain yield than winter wheat. In one of the five cases where winter wheat was seeded much later than the recommended seeding date, CPS wheat yields were 16% higher than winter wheat. With every millimetre of increased ET, CPS or barley increased grain yield by 22 kg ha−1, while winter wheat increased yield by 17 kg ha−1. Winter wheat and rye had no yield differences in general, but in more moist environments, winter wheat produced higher (up to 28%) grain yield than fall rye, and in the year when winter wheat was seeded late, winter wheat yielded 11% lower than rye. As fertiliser N increased from 50 to 100 kg ha−1, barley grain yield increased by 347 kg ha−1, and durum grain yield increased by only 5 kg ha−1. Winter wheat, fall rye and barley had greater WUE than the other spring cereals, but soil profile (0–120 cm) water in the spring did not differ among crops. In maximising grain yield and water use in east-central Saskatchewan, barley, winter wheat, and CPS wheat would provide the best options. Key words: Water-use efficiency, protein, winter wheat, Triticum aestivum, Secale cereale, Triticum turgidum, Hordeum vulgare


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document