scholarly journals Simultaneous Robot assisted pyeloplasty and distal ureteric reimplantation for ipsilateral UPJ Obstruction and distal ureteric stricture

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S27
Author(s):  
O.E. Lynch ◽  
M.P. Broe ◽  
P.C. Ryan ◽  
M. Hegazy ◽  
J. Ryan ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 479-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iqbal Singh ◽  
Ashok K. Hemal

The purpose of this study was to assess the current role of robot-assisted urological surgery in the female pelvis. The recently published English literature was reviewed to evaluate this role, with special emphasis on reconstructive procedures. These included colposuspension for genuine female stress urinary incontinence, repair of female genitourinary fistulas, ureterosciatic hernias, sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse, ureterolysis and omental wrap for retroperitoneal fibrosis, ureteric reimplantation, and bladder surgery. To date, a wide spectrum of urogynecological reconstructive procedures have been performed with the assistance of the surgical robot and have been reported worldwide. Currently, a number of female pelvic ablative and reconstructive procedures are technically feasible with the aid of the surgical robot. While the role of robot-assisted surgery for bladder cancer, ureterolysis, ureteric reimplantation, repair of genitourinary fistulas, colposuspension, and sacrocolpopexy is nearly established among urologists, other procedures, such as myomectomy, simple hysterectomy, trachelectomy, and Wertheim's hysterectomy, are still evolving with gynecologists. The advantages of robot assistance include better hand-eye coordination, three-dimensional magnified stereoscopic vision with depth perception, intuitive movements with increased precision, and filtering of hand tremors. For most of the currently performed procedures in selected patients, the robot-assisted surgical outcomes appear to be relatively superior as compared to an open and purely laparoscopic surgical procedure.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-43
Author(s):  
Karl H. Pang ◽  
Saiful Miah ◽  
Mark D. Haynes ◽  
Neil E. Oakley

Ureteric strictures can be caused by traumatic pelvic surgery, urolithiasis and instrumentation. There are various treatment options for ureteric stricture, including laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation. A 56-year-old female with a history of chronic left pelviureteric junction obstruction presented with urosepsis secondary to right-sided urolithiasis. The patient had a left nephrectomy and developed right-sided ureteric stricture following repeated ureteroscopy to manage her stone disease. The treatment with ureteric stenting was unsuccessful. Here we present a case on the feasibility of laparoscopic reimplantation for ureteric stricture in a solitary kidney to preserve renal function and avoid further ureteroscopy or nephrostomies.


Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrawan K. Singh ◽  
Abhishek Chandna ◽  
Gopal Sharma ◽  
Girdhar S. Bora ◽  
Aditya Prakash Sharma

2016 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg ◽  
Bhavan P Rai ◽  
Minh Do ◽  
Anja Dietel ◽  
Evangelos Liatsikos ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Y. Thyavihally ◽  
A. Pednekar ◽  
H. Rao ◽  
A. Patil ◽  
N. Gulavani ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abolfazl Hosseini ◽  
Linda Dey ◽  
Oscar Laurin ◽  
Cristofer Adding ◽  
Jonas Hoijer ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Karmo ◽  
Kenneth Lim ◽  
Richard Santucci ◽  
Sabry Mansour

Ureteral polyps are a rare cause of ureteral obstruction in the adult and pediatric populations. Fibroepitheial polyps (FEP) are the most common type of ureteral polyps. This clinical entity is very rare, warranting periodic clinical review by practitioners, and new advancements in laparoscopy allow new surgical approaches to its cure. We present the case of a 20-year-old male with right sided flank pain. He was found to have right uretero-pelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and subsequently underwent laparoscopic robotic-assisted right collecting system exploration, excision of polyps and right ureteropyeloplasty. Ureteral polyps were excised and determined to be fibroepithelial in origin based on the pathological report. Our case highlights the importance of having FEP in the differential diagnosis of ureteral obstruction. We also found that laparoscopic robot-assisted polypectomy is a safe and acceptable surgical option for the excision of ureteral polyps.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah Stern ◽  
Peter Wang ◽  
Sumit Dave

Introduction: Robotic pediatric urologic surgery has gained widespread adoption over the last decade. This article describes our experience in instituting the first pediatric urologic robotic surgery program in Canada. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of instituting pediatric robot-assisted urologic surgery and report our early outcomes for robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) and ureteric reimplantation (RUR). Methods: We prospectively evaluated all patients undergoing RAP and RUR by a single surgeon from June 2013 to March 2019. Demographic and clinical data were prospectively collected and included sex, age, and preoperative grade of hydronephrosis or reflux. Descriptive statistics were performed, and comparisons were made using Student’s t-tests where appropriate. Success was defined as resolution or significant improvement of hydronephrosis following RAP and absence of recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) and/or persistent vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) following RUR. Complications were described using the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: A total of 52 RAPs and 24 RURs were performed with a minimum of six months followup. Forty-five RAP patients met criteria for success, while diagnostic imaging of success in the form of MAG-3 Lasix renograms was documented in the remaining seven for an overall success of 100%. Sixteen RUR patients met criteria for success and seven showed resolution of VUR on imaging following their first UTI, for an overall success rate of 96%. Operative times progressively improved from 204±35 minutes to 121±15 minutes in the RAP group and from 224±52 to 132±39 minutes in the RUR group. In the RAP cohort, one Clavien grade II and four Clavien grade III complications were noted, while three Clavien grade III complications were noted in the RUR cohort. Conclusions: Despite limited case volumes, robotic pediatric urologic surgery can be integrated into the Canadian healthcare system with success rates comparable to reported literature. However, compared to open surgery, RAP and especially RUR warrant further study to ensure lack of significant complications noted in our study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document