Ownership Structure, Related Party Transactions, and Firm Valuation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrinder Khosa ◽  
Kamran Ahmed ◽  
Darren Henry
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Firm Valuation ◽  
Related Party Transactions

IFRS related party transactions disclosure and firm valuation in the United Arab Emirates emerging market

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walaa Wahid Elkelish
Keyword(s):  
United Arab Emirates ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Firm Valuation ◽  
Control Variables ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Related Party Transactions ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between related party transactions disclosure (RPTD) and firm valuation in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), an emerging market. Design/methodology/approach Data on study variables were obtained manually from the published financial statements of all listed companies in the stock market during the period 2008-2012. Panel regression analysis models with fixed and random effects were used to ensure reliability of results. Several robustness checks were undertaken on the study outcomes. Findings The empirical results show that there is a significant negative relationship between RPTD and firm valuation in the UAE. RPTDs for subsidiaries and associates have the most damaging impact on firm valuation. Other control variables such as corporate governance disclosure (CGD), debt to equity, asset tangibility and sales growth show significant impact on firm valuation. Research limitations/implications The potential difference in the understanding of what constitutes “related party” across companies may affect the extent of related party disclosure across companies. Furthermore, some variables are not controlled for such as ownership structure and cultural values. Practical implications This paper provides useful practical guidelines for regulatory agencies, corporate managers and other stakeholders for improving the financial reporting system. Originality/value RPTD was measured according to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IAS 24) standards. Furthermore, the impact of new control variables such as CGD and product market competition was tested for financial and non-financial sectors.

scholarly journals Controlling shareholders and corporate valuation in Brazil

2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-141
Author(s):  
Ricardo P. C. Leal ◽  
Andre Carvalhal da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Firm Valuation ◽  
Controlling Shareholder ◽  
Controlling Shareholders ◽  
Corporate Valuation ◽  
Large Shareholders ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Cash Flow Rights

This paper investigates the relation between the ownership structure, valuation and performance of Brazilian companies. The results show that large shareholders keep control while holding only a small fraction of cash flow rights. The evidence also indicates that non-voting shares and pyramiding are the main devices set to entrench the large controlling shareholder. There is some evidence that firm valuation and performance are negatively related to voting concentration, and that foreign-owned firms perform the best while government-owned firms perform the worst.

scholarly journals Dividend taxation, ownership structure and payout policy: Evidence from India

2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-302
Author(s):  
Chandrasekhar Krishnamurti ◽  
M.S. Narasimhan
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Natural Experiment ◽  
Payout Policy ◽  
Firm Valuation ◽  
Indian Government ◽  
Double Taxation ◽  
Taxation Policy ◽  
Personal Taxes ◽  
Rule Change ◽  
The Impact

Despite the widespread criticism against double taxation of dividends, most countries follow the policy of taxing the same income twice – once when the corporations earn it and a second time when shareholders receive it. Critics of the double taxation policy clamor for its abolition citing the economic inefficiencies it engenders. In 1997, the Indian government eliminated double taxation of dividends by exempting dividend income from personal taxes but requiring the firms to pay a 10% tax on the amount of dividend distributed. Using this rule change as a natural experiment, we examine the impact of this rule change on firm valuation. We show that elimination of double taxation on dividends is not unambiguously beneficial to the stockholders of the firm. We find that tax status and ownership structure play a significant role in explaining the direction of observed changes in valuation. An interesting finding of this paper is that shareholders seem to value visibility. Visible firms are subject to the disciplining effect of more stringent disclosures in the financial press. We do find pervasive evidence that firms increased their dividends subsequent to rule change. We however, do not find any association between the change in dividends and ownership structure

Regional dynamics of ownership structure and their impact on firm performance and firm valuation

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Awais Ali ◽  
Fu Qiang ◽  
Sadia Ashraf
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
State Ownership ◽  
Firm Valuation ◽  
Market Valuation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Geographical Regions ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the impact of ownership structure on firm valuation and performance across different geographical regions within mainland China. Design/methodology/approach The authors classify China in six geographical regions and use cross-sectional data of companies with A-shares listed on domestic stock exchanges in China for the year-end 2015. Using data from CSMAR and Wind database, they use multivariate regression technique and analytically compare the consistency of relationship between operational variables of ownership structure with corporate performance and evaluation. Findings The authors find that institutional ownership and state ownership negatively affect market valuation throughout various geographical regions of China. Further, in East, Northwest, South Central and Southwestern parts of China, managerial ownership and concentration of shareholding among top ten shareholders positively influence return on equity (ROE). Interestingly, institutional shareholding negatively affects return on assets (ROA), while institutional ownership has a neutral effect on profitability margin in Northeast China. Although in northern part of China, this relationship is slightly positive. In East China region, state ownership and ownership concentration are directly proportional to profitability margin. Practical implications As some of the findings exhibit weak state of market efficiency in some regions, the study may also be useful in identifying arbitrage opportunities across different regions. Moreover, this study suggests that regions with the same business environment and conditions anywhere around the globe invite same or similar ownership structure for better firm performance and valuation. Originality/value The study provides unique understanding of relationship between ownership structure, market valuation and firm performance in various parts of China and will be an addition to the relevant literature. Given a change in company’s ownership structure and considering its region of incorporation, this study will help investment analysts in assessing performance and market valuation of the firm. It will also assist several classes of investors, financial institutions and international businesses in making their investment decisions.

Related party transactions and earnings management in Jordan: the role of ownership structure

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 505-531
Author(s):  
Mohammad Alhadab ◽  
Modar Abdullatif ◽  
Israa Mansour
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Real Earnings Management ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Related Party Transactions ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the relation between related party transactions and both accrual and real earnings management practices in Jordanian industrial public-listed companies, taking into account the uniqueness of the Jordanian company ownership structure. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from Jordanian industrial public-listed companies for the period 2011–2017. Accrual earnings management is measured by using the modified Jones model, whereas real earnings management and related party transactions are measured by using relevant proxies. A regression model is developed and used to assess the relation between related party transactions and earnings management, taking into account the effects of ownership concentration, family ownership and institutional ownership levels of the companies involved. Findings Accrual earnings management is negatively associated with related party transactions. Regarding the role of ownership structure, the presence of institutional investors is positively associated with using both related party transactions and real earnings management, whereas ownership concentration plays an efficient role to mitigate the use of both accrual earnings management and related party transactions. No statistically significant relations between real earnings management and related party transactions exist. Practical implications This study has direct practical implications for the Jordanian regulatory authorities to enact regulations to limit the misuse of related party transactions and earnings management transactions and ensure sufficient monitoring of these transactions because of their prevalence. Jordanian companies should also enhance their corporate governance systems to better approve and monitor such transactions, including enhancing the role of independent and non-controlling board members in this process. Originality/value Related party transactions are considered as a major concern of financial reporting quality in developed countries, and such transactions are found to be relatively more problematic in developing countries, where corporate governance is generally weak, and there is limited disclosure and transparency in financial reporting. From this perspective, this study is one of the very few studies in developing countries that explore the issue of related party transactions and their association with earnings management practices. Thus, the findings of this study can arguably be to some extent generalized to other developing country contexts, because of relatively similar business environment conditions, and therefore potentially fill a gap represented by the paucity of similar studies in developing countries.

Related Party Transactions, Value Relevance and Informativeness of Earnings: Evidence from Four Economies in East Asia

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 2050005
Author(s):  
Mohd Mohid Rahmat ◽  
Kamran Ahmed ◽  
Gerald J. Lobo
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
East Asia ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Earnings Quality ◽  
Accounting Earnings ◽  
Related Party Transactions ◽  
Sensitivity Tests ◽  
Negative Effect

We investigate the effect of related party transactions (RPTs) on value relevance and informativeness of accounting earnings for firms based in East Asia. Using a hand-collected sample of 398 listed companies comprising 1194 firm-year observations from Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, we find that firms engaging more extensively in RPTs have significantly lower value relevance and lower informativeness of earnings both in the current year and subsequent year than firms engaging less in RPTs. Furthermore, the results indicate that the types of RPTs affect value relevance and informativeness of earnings differently in that the effect of simple and loans RPTs are more negative than complex transactions. The extent of the negative effect of RPTs is lower in Hong Kong and Singapore where investor protection is higher compared to the other two economies. These findings are robust to controlling for firm-specific attributes, corporate governance, ownership structure, earnings quality, and a variety of sensitivity tests. These results are consistent with the conflict of interest view that RPTs compromise the quality of accounting earnings and this leads to the reduction in earnings and market value relationship for firms that engage in RPTs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document