Embryo Metabolism and What Does the Embryo Need?

Author(s):  
Paula Vergaro ◽  
Roger G. Sturmey
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 87-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashleigh J. Henderson ◽  
Bethany J. Finger ◽  
Alexander W. Scott ◽  
Alexandra J. Harvey ◽  
Mark P. Green

BioEssays ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry J. Leese ◽  
Joe Conaghan ◽  
Karen L. Martin ◽  
Kate Hardy

2019 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 615-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusra Obeidat ◽  
Giovana Catandi ◽  
Elaine Carnevale ◽  
Adam J. Chicco ◽  
August DeMann ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubhashree Uppangala ◽  
Shivananda Pudakalakatti ◽  
Fiona D’souza ◽  
Sujith Raj Salian ◽  
Guruprasad Kalthur ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.P.F. Xavier ◽  
N.S.M. Leandro ◽  
A.G. Mascarenhas ◽  
I.C.S. De Araújo ◽  
N.F. De Oliveira ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of guava extract as a dietary supplement for Japanese quail hens on incubation parameters, intestinal development, and the quality of newly hatched chicks. Six hundred and forty-eight eggs were collected from Japanese quail hens fed diets with 0.0, 3.0, 6.0, and 9.0 g/kg of guava extract. The study consisted of four treatments, six replicates, and 27 eggs per replicate. The guava extract contained 2% ellagic acid. The eggs were incubated at 37.5 °C and 65% relative air humidity. The hatch window, hatchability, embryo development in unhatched eggs, quality of newly hatched quails, and intestinal histomorphometry of a duodenum segment were evaluated. Differences among the treatments in hatchability and the hatch window were not significant. The guava extract did not affect mortality rate, live pecking, dead pecking, and contaminated and inverted eggs. The number of infertile eggs was lower in the groups that received 3.0 and 9.0 g/kg of extract in their diets. Use of up to 3.0 g/kg of guava extract in the diet increased the weight of both eggs and newly hatched chicks. The quality score of newly hatched quail was similar across treatments. The inclusion of 3.0 g/kg of guava extract in the diet of Japanese quail breeder hens increased the hatchling weight of the chicks and improved the villus to crypt ratio of their duodenum. Keywords: embryology, embryo metabolism, hatchery, incubation, breeder nutrition


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 1797-1805
Author(s):  
Emily A. Seidler ◽  
T. Sanchez ◽  
M. Venturas ◽  
D. Sakkas ◽  
D. J. Needleman

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
S. L. Wakefield ◽  
A. N. Filby ◽  
M. Lane ◽  
M. Mitchell

Exposure of an embryo to suboptimal environments, including poor embryo culture media or inadequate maternal diet, can disrupt fetal and placental development and whilst the exact mechanisms responsible remain unknown, perturbed embryo metabolism has been implicated. We propose that stress applied to an early embryo causes mitochondrial dysfunction, resulting in a permanent epigenetic change. Thus the aim of this study was to determine the affect of directly perturbing mitochondria in the embryo, on development, metabolism and expression of the ATP-dependant chromatin remodelling protein, ATRX. Zygotes collected from gonadotrophin stimulated C57BL/6xCBA mice were cultured to the two-cell stage and then exposed to one of three treatments; control medium (C), medium lacking pyruvate (-P; embryos dependant on the mitochondrial Malate Aspartate Shuttle, MAS) or medium lacking pyruvate plus 5µM amino-oxyacetate (AOA), a specific MAS inhibitor (-P+AOA). Blastocyst development and metabolism were assessed by determining cell number and allocation, glycolysis, and ATP:ADP ratio. Relative gene expression of ATRX, was examined using RT PCR. Embryos dependant on the MAS alone (-P) had significantly decreased blastocyst development (87.1% v. 98.2%, P < 0.05), with a compensatory increase in glycolysis (0.20 v. 0.07 pmol/cell/hr, P < 0.001) despite a decrease in ATP:ADP (0.10 v. 0.13, P < 0.06), relative to the control. Inhibition of the MAS (-P+AOA) further reduced blastocyst development,(77.3%, P < 0.001) and decreased ATP:ADP (0.08, P < 0.004), but there was no change in glycolysis relative to control embryos (0.09 pmol/cell/hr, P = 0.3). Expression of ATRX was significantly increased for –P+AOA embryos relative to the control (1.63 v. 1.0, P < 0.007) but did not differ for –P embryos (1.1). This study demonstrates that direct perturbations of mitochondrial function in the embryo compromises its metabolic regulation and blastocyst development, and the expression of the epigenetic modulator ATRX. Further studies are underway to elucidate the implications of disrupted metabolic control and this epigenetic modulator on pregnancy outcomes.


Author(s):  
Samy R ◽  
◽  
Ghanem N ◽  

The production of in vitro produced embryos of good morphological quality and viability is a prerequisite for successful assisted reproduction biotechnologies in animal breeding and human. The co-culturing system has been applied to improve preimplantation development that could subsequently resulted in successful pregnancy. There are different types of reproductive and non-reproductive cells that have been used during preimplantation development. The most well-known reproductive cells are those recovered from ovaries (cumulus and granulosa cells), oviduct and endometrium cells. While, in last decade stem cells such as mesenchymal stem cells and murine embryonic fibroblasts that originated from different tissues have been used to support early embryonic development. The positive effect co-culturing system was suggested to be due to direct mechanical cell-to-cell contact that occurred between the dividing embryos embryo and helper cells in addition to secretions of various bioactive biological components like growth factors and scavenging the deleterious byproducts that resulted from embryo metabolism. In current review, we will highlight the effects of different couture systems on embryo development and their suggested mechanisms to exert the beneficial impacts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4_2020 ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Smolnikova V.Yu. Smolnikova ◽  
Ibragimova L.K. Ibragimova ◽  
Bobrov M.Yu. Bobrov ◽  
Romanov E.A. Romanov ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document