Twin Peaks, Macroprudential Regulation and Systemic Financial Stability

Author(s):  
Andrew Godwin ◽  
Steve Kourabas ◽  
Ian Ramsay
Policy Papers ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (45) ◽  
Author(s):  

The issue of using monetary policy for financial stability purposes is hotly contested. The crisis was a reminder that price stability is not sufficient for financial stability, financial crises are costly, and policy should aim to decrease the likelihood of crises, not only rely on dealing with their repercussions once they occur. It is clear that well-targeted prudential policies (including micro and macroprudential regulation and supervision) should be pursued actively to attenuate the buildup of financial risks. The question is whether monetary policy should be altered to contain financial stability risks. Should it lend a hand by temporarily raising interest rates more than warranted by price and output stability objectives? Keeping rates persistently higher is also possible, but more costly.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-30
Author(s):  
Victoria Kovalenko ◽  
◽  
Sergii Sheludko ◽  

Introduction. The study has confirmed that ensuring of financial markets’ development stability is connected with the development of an effective system for macroprudential regulation. The financial crisis has shown that price stability is not enough to ensure financial stability. The financial and business cycles are not synchronized – therefore risks can arise, especially during periods of “disconnection” between two cycles. Purpose. The aim of the paper is to systematize basic concepts of macroprudential regulation in financial markets, considering international practice of its instruments selection and usage. Results. It is clarified the approaches to a set of macroprudential instruments formation which depends on the country’s economic development and the vulnerability of a financial sector to internal and external shocks. It has been substantiated that monetary regulation is aimed at ensuring price stability in the market for goods and services. It has been proven that it should not be used to address hotbeds of volatility in asset markets. This is a subject for macroprudential regulation, aimed to ensuring the stability of financial markets and containing systemic risk. It has been identified the factors causing the need to implement the strategy of macroprudential regulation in financial markets to ensure their stable development. They include: systemic risk and financial cycles; considering the importance of a growing market’s credit system and measures to address its risks; the need to increase the transparency of the shadow banking sector; problems in regulating the FinTech branch; international financial standards; the growing role of the central periphery in international finance. Conclusions. It has been concluded that a powerful macroprudential political mandate and an adequate set of instruments should be given for central banks to solve the problem of increasing financial risks, especially in situations where monetary regulation is adaptive. It has been substantiated the conclusion about the need to develop supervisory and coordination mechanisms in the financial market and the introduction of end-to-end monitoring of systemic risks as a prerequisite for restoring financial stability.


2012 ◽  
pp. 32-47
Author(s):  
S. Andryushin ◽  
V. Kuznetsova

The paper analyzes central banks macroprudencial policy and its instruments. The issues of their classification, option, design and adjustment are connected with financial stability of overall financial system and its specific institutions. The macroprudencial instruments effectiveness is evaluated from the two points: how they mitigate temporal and intersectoral systemic risk development (market, credit, and operational). The future macroprudentional policy studies directions are noted to identify the instruments, which can be used to limit the financial systemdevelopment procyclicality, mitigate the credit and financial cycles volatility.


2020 ◽  
pp. 66-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Abramov ◽  
A. D. Radygin ◽  
M. I. Chernova ◽  
R. M. Entov

This article analyzes the key patterns of the dividend policy and the problem of the “dividend puzzle” in the general context of the development of the stock market in Russia. The article consists of two parts.In the first part we summarize main research trends of dividend policy in modern economic theory (the classical Modigliani—Miller theory of dividend irrelevance, agent and signal hypotheses, the smoothing model, the catering theory, etc.). We emphasize the theoretical analysis of motivation of the largest Russian companies for profit allocation and dividend payout, based on a sample of 236 joint stock companies. Since 2012, a steady increase in dividend payments has been revealed in both private and state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The bulk of dividend payments from SOEs accounts for only 12 major companies. Along with an increase in the market value, dividends have become an important factor in the total return on shares. Under current conditions, the probability of paying dividends depends not only on the size of the company and indicators of its’ financial stability, but also on the presence of the state in the capital of companies. However, the relationship between the probability of paying dividends and state participation in the ownership structure is not universal and can be explained by specific factors that go beyond the classical dividend theories.In the second part we will analyze the patterns of stock market performance and dividend policy of the largest Russian companies, motivation for dividend payouts and special aspects of SOEs policy.


Author(s):  
L.I. Lachkova ◽  
A.O. Borysova ◽  
V.M. Lachkova
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document