scholarly journals AN ECONOMIC RISK ANALYSIS OF WEED-SUPPRESSIVE RICE CULTIVARS IN CONVENTIONAL RICE PRODUCTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. BRADLEY WATKINS ◽  
DAVID R. GEALY ◽  
MERLE M. ANDERS ◽  
RANJITSINH U. MANE
Keyword(s):  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Rice Production ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Rice Cultivars ◽  
Economic Risk ◽  
Absolute Risk Aversion ◽  
Certainty Equivalents

AbstractWeed-suppressive rice cultivars have the potential to reduce heavy reliance on synthetic herbicides in rice production. However, the economics of using weed-suppressive rice cultivars in conventional rice systems have not been fully evaluated. This study uses simulation and stochastic efficiency with respect to a function to rank weed-suppressive and weed-nonsuppressive rice cultivars under alternative herbicide intensity levels based on their certainty equivalents mapped across increasing levels of absolute risk aversion. The results indicate risk-averse rice producers would prefer to grow weed-suppressive cultivars using less herbicide inputs than what would be used to grow weed-nonsuppressive rice cultivars.

Fractional Degree Stochastic Dominance

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (10) ◽  
pp. 4630-4647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel J. Huang ◽  
Larry Y. Tzeng ◽  
Lin Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Stochastic Dominance ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Comparative Statics ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Absolute Risk Aversion ◽  
Risk Apportionment ◽  
Lottery Choices ◽  
Increase In Risk

We develop a continuum of stochastic dominance rules for expected utility maximizers. The new rules encompass the traditional integer-degree stochastic dominance; between adjacent integer degrees, they formulate the consensus of individuals whose absolute risk aversion at the corresponding integer degree has a negative lower bound. By extending the concept of “uniform risk aversion” previously proposed in the literature to high-order risk preferences, we interpret the fractionalized degree parameter as a benchmark individual relative to whom all considered individuals are uniformly no less risk averse in the lottery choices. The equivalent distribution conditions for the new rules are provided, and the fractional degree “increase in risk” is defined. We generalize the previously defined notion of “risk apportionment” and demonstrate its usefulness in characterizing comparative statics of risk changes in fractional degrees. This paper was accepted by David Simchi-Levi, decision analysis.

scholarly journals Are Invisible Hands Good Hands in Health Care Markets? Extension

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Wang
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Social Welfare ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Health Care Markets ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Absolute Risk Aversion ◽  
Insurance Policies ◽  
Equilibrium Level

AbstractA previous study finds that increased competition in health care markets improves social welfare, although consumers use “too much” health care when they have health insurance. The analysis assumes that consumers have a constant Arrow-Pratt coefficient of absolute risk aversion. This note shows that this finding can be extended to the case where consumers are simply risk averse. Furthermore, if insurers offered insurance policies with slightly lower usage prices than the equilibrium level, social welfare would be improved.

scholarly journals Short‐term investments and indices of risk

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 891-921
Author(s):  
Yuval Heller ◽  
Amnon Schreiber
Keyword(s):  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Decision Problems ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Risky Assets ◽  
Absolute Risk Aversion ◽  
Constant Absolute Risk Aversion

We study various decision problems regarding short‐term investments in risky assets whose returns evolve continuously in time. We show that in each problem, all risk‐averse decision makers have the same (problem‐dependent) ranking over short‐term risky assets. Moreover, in each problem, the ranking is represented by the same risk index as in the case of constant absolute risk aversion utility agents and normally distributed risky assets.

scholarly journals Input Demand Under Joint Energy and Output Prices Uncertainties

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (04) ◽  
pp. 1750018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moawia Alghalith ◽  
Xu Guo ◽  
Cuizhen Niu ◽  
Wing-Keung Wong
Keyword(s):  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Comparative Statics ◽  
Energy Price ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Absolute Risk Aversion ◽  
Output Price ◽  
Input Demand ◽  
Mean Variance

In this paper, we analyze the impacts of joint energy and output prices uncertainties on the input demands in a mean–variance framework. We find that an increase in expected output price will surely cause the risk-averse firm to increase the input demand, while an increase in expected energy price will surely cause the risk-averse firm to decrease the demand for energy, but increase the demand for the non-risky inputs. Furthermore, we investigate the two cases with only uncertain energy price and only uncertain output price. In the case with only uncertain energy price, we find that the uncertain energy price has no impact on the demands for the non-risky inputs. We also show that the concepts of elasticity and decreasing absolute risk aversion (DARA) play an important role in the comparative statics analysis.

Utility and Risk Aversion

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry E. Back
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Expected Utility ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Risk Tolerance ◽  
Relative Risk Aversion ◽  
Absolute Risk Aversion ◽  
Certainty Equivalents ◽  
Conditional Expectations ◽  
Constant Absolute Risk Aversion

Expected utility is introduced. Risk aversion and its equivalence with concavity of the utility function (Jensen’s inequality) are explained. The concepts of relative risk aversion, absolute risk aversion, and risk tolerance are introduced. Certainty equivalents are defined. Expected utility is shown to imply second‐order risk aversion. Linear risk tolerance (hyperbolic absolute risk aversion), cautiousness parameters, constant relative risk aversion, and constant absolute risk aversion are described. Decreasing absolute risk aversion is shown to imply a preference for positive skewness. Preferences for kurtosis are discussed. Conditional expectations are introduced, and the law of iterated expectations is explained. Risk averse investors are shown to dislike mean‐independent noise.

Constant Absolute Risk Aversion, Bankruptcy, and Wealth-Dependent Decisions

1980 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Lippman ◽  
John J. McCall ◽  
Wayne L. Winston
Keyword(s):  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Absolute Risk Aversion ◽  
Constant Absolute Risk Aversion

Eliciting Risk Preferences and Elasticity of Substitution

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-329
Author(s):  
Johan Burgaard ◽  
Mogens Steffensen
Keyword(s):  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Discount Rate ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Recursive Utility ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Indirect Utility ◽  
Consistent Estimation ◽  
On Certainty ◽  
Certainty Equivalents ◽  
Elasticity Of Intertemporal Substitution

Risk aversion and elasticity of intertemporal substitution (EIS) are separated via the celebrated recursive utility building on certainty equivalents of indirect utility. Based on an alternative separation method, we formulate a questionnaire for simultaneous and consistent estimation of risk aversion, subjective discount rate, and EIS. From a representative group of 1,153 respondents, we estimate parameters for these preferences and their variability within the population. Risk aversion and the subjective discount rate are found to be in the orders of 2 and 0, respectively, not diverging far away from results from other studies. Our estimate of EIS in the order of 10 is larger than often reported. Background variables like age and income have little predictive power for the three estimates. Only gender has a significant influence on risk aversion in the usually perceived direction that females are more risk-averse than males. Using individual estimates of preference parameters, we find covariance between preferences toward risk and EIS. We present the background reasoning on objectives, the questionnaire, a statistical analysis of the results, and economic interpretations of these, including relations to the literature.

On the relationship between absolute prudence and absolute risk aversion

2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario A. Maggi ◽  
Umberto Magnani ◽  
Mario Menegatti
Keyword(s):  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Absolute Risk Aversion ◽  
The Relationship

DE FINETTI ON RISK AVERSION

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-159
Author(s):  
Joseph B. Kadane ◽  
Gaia Bellone
Keyword(s):  
Risk Aversion ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Risk Premia ◽  
Absolute Risk Aversion ◽  
Kenneth Arrow ◽  
De Finetti ◽  
Constant Absolute Risk Aversion ◽  
Special Case

According to Mark Rubinstein (2006) ‘In 1952, anticipating Kenneth Arrow and John Pratt by over a decade, he [de Finetti] formulated the notion of absolute risk aversion, used it in connection with risk premia for small bets, and discussed the special case of constant absolute risk aversion.’ The purpose of this note is to ascertain the extent to which this is true, and at the same time, to correct certain minor errors that appear in de Finetti's work.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document