Happiness economics as technocracy
AbstractHappiness economics as advocated by Frijters et al. makes three assumptions: that policy should be based on facts about the net effect of a factor on happiness; that wellbeing policy should be technocratic and centralized; and that the only credible objections come from critics who do not value happiness. We argue that all three should be rejected and that the science and policy of wellbeing should instead be pluralistic, context-sensitive and participatory.
2014 ◽
Vol 25
(4)
◽
pp. 233-238
◽
2007 ◽
Vol 18
(2-3)
◽
pp. 126-142
2017 ◽
2012 ◽
Vol 23
(7)
◽
pp. 1635-1655
◽