Environmental Law Reform to Control Land Degradation in the People's Republic of China: A View of the Legal Framework of the PRC–GEF Partnership Program

Author(s):  
Ian Hannam ◽  
Du Qun
Author(s):  
Roman Z. Rouvinsky ◽  
Tatiana Komarova

This article examines the normative legal framework and principles of functionality of the Social Credit System that is currently being implemented in the People's Republic of China. For the first time in legal science, the Social Credit System is viewed not as an organizational and regulatory technique that in one or another way is related to law, but rather as an independent legal institution relevant to the branch of administrative law. The application of formal-legal and comparative-legal methods allows describing the hierarchy of sources of the Chinese law pertaining to social credit mechanisms and procedures, as well as giving characteristics to major provisions of the corresponding normative acts. The peculiarities of legal regulation of the mechanisms and procedures that comprise the Social Credit System in PRC include the following aspects: sublegislative nature of such regulation, prevalence of joint lawmaking, focal role of normative legal acts of the Chinese government, declarative character and ambiguity of multiple legal provisions with regards to the Social Credit System. The author underline the specificity of interpretation of the normative legal acts of the People's Republic of China, usage by the lawmaking branches of moral categories in formulation of provisions for regulation of elaboration and implementation of the social credit mechanisms. The provisions of governmental and departmental normative legal acts pertaining to the Social Credit System are correlated with the provisions of the current Constitution of the People's Republic of China.


1973 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 190-192
Author(s):  
Rauer Meyer

I shall address myself to controls on exports. And here, when the program talks about the “Legal Framework of East-West Trade,” it might more properly be called a “thicket” rather than a “framework.” At least ten pieces of legislation govern exports, but I shall focus on controls exercised by the Department of Commerce, since they affect the vast proportion of commodities in commercial transactions with the Communist countries. I shall not distinguish between the situation with regard to the People’s Republic of China and the Eastern European countries, because our published regulations make no such distinction.


Author(s):  
Cyan' Mensin'

The article provides a detailed analysis of professional communication between Russia and the People's Republic of China in the field of education. Noting the long historical relationships between the two countries, the author notes that Russia and China have a rather long relationship in the field of educational communications, starting in 1862, when a teacher from Russia was first invited to teach the Russian language at the Beijing School. Interaction and professional communication is also explained by the fact that in China the model of Soviet education was once borrowed, but adapted to Chinese realities. The author presents the priority areas of cooperation between the two states in the new millennium, due to the intergovernmental "Treaty on Good-Neighbourliness, Friendship and Cooperation" (2005). The author attaches a special role to the creation within the framework of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (hereinafter - SCO) of the SCO University (USHOS), which has been operating since 2009 and includes more than 80 universities from Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Belarus, etc. This fact is the largest initiative in the world. In conclusion, the author also noted problematic areas of professional communication between China and Russia, among which is an insufficiently developed legal framework for educational cooperation and joint training of professional personnel in the framework of language training.


1998 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 788-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Palmer

In the post-Mao era, one highly significant dimension of China's official programme of reform and integration into the international economy has been a commitment to legal construction. This commitment has included a sustained effort to fashion a basic corpus of environmental protection law alongside supportive institutions, administrative norms and policies, in order to create a “basic legal system of environmental protection” (huanjing baohu de jiben falii zhidu).' In the eyes of the authorities in the People's Republic of China, such efforts reflect a degree of environmental concern that is unusually strong for a developing society.2 China's achievements, we are often told, must be placed in the context of the considerable difficulties the PRC faces in terms of the pressing need to raise living standards, a serious problem of over-population, a shortage of natural resources, an outdated industrial infrastructure and poor industrial management.3 Of course, viewed comparatively, the PRC's embrace of environmental protection law was somewhat belated,4 only properly commencing after its participation in the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held in Stockholm. The subsequent expansion of environmental legislation and enforcement has been some-what erratic. Nevertheless, there appears to be a continuing intent to fashion a substantial body of environmental law, and concern with the construction and revision of this was further enhanced by China's participation in the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro. Following this, Premier Li Peng “made a commitment to conscientiously implement resolutions adopted at the Conference”5 and, given the PRC's very substantial size and population, a positive embrace of internationally acceptable standards of environmental welfare is highly significant for future global environmental protection. This article examines the principal features and significance of the PRC's domestic environmental protection law, and considers briefly the implications of the Chinese approach to environmental law for understanding the development of law more generally in post-Mao China.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document