P035: Development of a province-wide audit program for return visits to the emergency department

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S89-S90
Author(s):  
L.B. Chartier ◽  
O. Ostrow ◽  
I. Yuen ◽  
S. Kutty ◽  
B. Davis ◽  
...  

Introduction: Routine auditing of charts of patients with an emergency department (ED) return visit (RV) resulting in hospital admission can uncover quality and safety gaps in care. This feedback can be helpful to clinicians, administrators, and leaders working to improve clinical outcomes, increase patient satisfaction, and promote high-value care. Health Quality Ontario (HQO) has been tasked by Ontario’s Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) to manage the newly created ED RV Quality Program (RVQP), which mandates EDs participating in the Pay-for-Results (P4R) program to audit a minimum of 25-50 RVs/year. The goal of the first-ever ED-specific province-wide Quality Improvement (QI) initiative of this kind is to promote a culture of QI that will lead to improved patient care. Methods: Participating hospitals receive quarterly confidential reports from Access to Care (ATC) that show their and other hospitals’ rates of RVs, as well as identifying information for patients meeting RV inclusion criteria at their ED (within 72 hrs of index visit, or within 7 days with specific diagnoses). HQO has partnered with QI experts and ED physician-leaders to develop various guidance materials. These materials have been disseminated through various media. Hospitals are conducting audits to identify underlying quality issues, take steps to address the underlying causes, and submit reports to HQO. A taskforce will then analyze clinical observations, summarize key findings and lessons learned, and share improvements at a provincial level through an annual report. Results: Since its launch in April 2016, 73 P4R and 16 voluntarily enrolled non-P4R hospitals (which collectively receive approximately 90% of ED visits in the province) are participating in the RVQP. ED leaders have engaged their hospital’s leadership to leverage interest and resources to improve patient care in the ED. To date, hospitals have conducted thousands of audits and have identified quality and safety gaps to address, which will be analyzed in February 2017 for reporting shortly thereafter. These will inform QI endeavours locally and provincially, and be the largest source of such data ever created in Ontario. Conclusion: The ED RVQP aims to create a culture of continuous QI in the Ontario health care system, which provides care to over 13.8 million people. Other jurisdictions can replicate this model to promote high-quality care.

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S103
Author(s):  
C. Roberts ◽  
T. Oyedokun ◽  
B. Cload ◽  
L. Witt

Introduction: Formal ultrasound imaging, with use of ultrasound technicians and radiologists, provides a valuable diagnostic component to patient care in the Emergency Department (ED). Outside of regular weekday hours, ordering formal ultrasounds can produce logistical difficulties. EDs have developed protocols for next-day ultrasounds, where the patient returns the following day for imaging and reassessment by an ED physician. This creates additional stress on ED resources – personnel, bed space, finances – that are already strained. There is a dearth of literature regarding the use of next-day ultrasounds or guidelines to direct efficient use. This study sought to accumulate data on the use of ED next-day ultrasounds and patient oriented clinical outcomes. Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of 150 patients, 75 from each of two different tertiary care hospitals in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. After a predetermined start date, convenience samples were collected of all patients who had undergone a next-day ultrasound ordered from the ED until the quota was satisfied. Patients were identified by an electronic medical record search for specific triage note phrases indicating use of next-day ultrasounds. Different demographic, clinical, and administrative parameters were collected and analyzed. Results: Of the 150 patients, the mean age was 35.9 years and 75.3% were female. Median length of stay for the first visit was 4.1 hours, and 2.2 hours for the return visit. Most common ultrasound scans performed were abdomen and pelvis/gyne (34.7%), complete abdomen (30.0%), duplex extremity venous (10.0%). Most common indications on the ultrasound requisition were nonspecific abdominal pain (18.7%), vaginal bleeding with or without pregnancy (17.3%), and hepatobiliary pathology (15.3%). Ultrasounds results reported a relevant finding 56% of the time, and 34% were completely normal. After the next-day ultrasound 5.3% of patients had a CT scan, 10.7% had specialist consultation, 8.2% were admitted, and 7.3% underwent surgery. Conclusion: Information was gathered to close gaps in knowledge about the use of next-day ultrasounds from the ED. A large proportion of patients are discharged home without further interventions. Additional research and the development of next-day ultrasound guidelines or outpatient pathways may improve patient care and ED resource utilization.


2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-210
Author(s):  
Yves Fortems ◽  
Elke Van Eynde ◽  
Charlotte Fortems

Despite the massive financial and human efforts of hospitals in the Flemish part of Belgium to increase quality through the path of external accreditation, so far this has not convinced the end user, in casu the patient. In this study of 307 hospital patients we conclude that the knowledge about accreditation is very limited to none existent (2%) in a sample of Belgian patients not working in medical practice and that patients do not choose their hospital care in accordance to the accreditation status of the hospital. We remain convinced that improving quality is a continuous concern for medical professionals and hospital management. However, we believe that patients, medical professionals and hospital managers might define quality care in a somewhat different way and we question the methodology of imposing a 2 vast amount of strict protocols as a way to improve quality in patient care. There is no conclusive evidence to support that these uniformly imposed “quality programs” improve patient care, except on safety issues.


Author(s):  
Sheila Leatherman ◽  
Linda Tawfik ◽  
Dilshad Jaff ◽  
Grace Jaworski ◽  
Matthew Neilson ◽  
...  

Abstract Quality problem or issue There are record-setting numbers of people living in settings of extreme adversity and they continue to increase each year. Initial assessment There is a paucity of validated data on quality and safety across settings of extreme adversity. Choice of solution This paper argues for an action framework to address the unique challenges of providing quality in extreme adversity. Implementation We describe a preliminary Quality in Extreme Adversity framework which has been informed by—and will continue to be validated through—literature, data collection, WHO expert consultations and through working in settings of extreme adversity with national authorities and NGOs. Lessons learned Poor quality care costs lives, livelihoods and trust in health services. The recommended framework, based on evidence and experiential lessons, intends to address the WHO goal for 2019–2023 of ‘one billion people better protected from health emergencies’ (9).


CJEM ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 5 (02) ◽  
pp. 104-107 ◽  
Author(s):  

BACKGROUND The Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) has been recognized as a significant improvement in standardizing triage in Canadian emergency departments (EDs), both urban and rural. Since its publication an increasing number of Canadian EDs have implemented the CTAS. It was intended to improve patient care through more appropriate triaging of patients, but a number of adverse effects from its implementation have been encountered in rural EDs.


1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 967-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Graff ◽  
Leslie S Zun ◽  
Jerrold Leikin ◽  
Brian Gibler ◽  
Michael S Weinstock ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralitsa B. Akins ◽  
Gilbert A. Handal

Abstract Objective Although there is an expectation for outcomes-oriented training in residency programs, the reality is that few guidelines and examples exist as to how to provide this type of education and training. We aimed to improve patient care outcomes in our pediatric residency program by using quality improvement (QI) methods, tools, and approaches. Methods A series of QI projects were implemented over a 3-year period in a pediatric residency program to improve patient care outcomes and teach the residents how to use QI methods, tools, and approaches. Residents experienced practice-based learning and systems-based assessment through group projects and review of their own patient outcomes. Resident QI experiences were reviewed quarterly by the program director and were a mandatory part of resident training portfolios. Results Using QI methodology, we were able to improve management of children with obesity, to achieve high compliance with the national patient safety goals, improve the pediatric hotline service, and implement better patient flow in resident continuity clinic. Conclusion Based on our experiences, we conclude that to successfully implement QI projects in residency programs, QI techniques must be formally taught, the opportunities for resident participation must be multiple and diverse, and QI outcomes should be incorporated in resident training and assessment so that they experience the benefits of the QI intervention. The lessons learned from our experiences, as well as the projects we describe, can be easily deployed and implemented in other residency programs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 775-788
Author(s):  
Robin Gauld ◽  
Simon Horsburgh

PurposeThe work environment is known to influence professional attitudes toward quality and safety. This study sought to measure these attitudes amongst health professionals working in New Zealand District Health Boards (DHBs), initially in 2012 and again in 2017.Design/methodology/approachThree questions were included in a national New Zealand health professional workforce survey conducted in 2012 and again in 2017. All registered health professionals employed with DHBs were invited to participate in an online survey. Areas of interest included teamwork amongst professionals; involvement of patients and families in efforts to improve patient care and ease of speaking up when a problem with patient care is perceived.FindingsIn 2012, 57% of respondents (58% in 2017) agreed health professionals worked as a team; 71% respondents (73% in 2017) agreed health professionals involved patients and families in efforts to improve patient care and 69% (65% in 2017) agreed it was easy to speak up in their clinical area, with none of these changes being statistically significant. There were some response differences by respondent characteristics.Practical implicationsWith no change over time, there is a demand for improvement. Also for leadership in policy, management and amongst health professionals if goals of improving quality and safety are to be delivered upon.Originality/valueThis study provides a simple three-question method of probing perceptions of quality and safety and an important set of insights into progress in New Zealand DHBs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document