scholarly journals A DIRECT PROOF OF SCHWICHTENBERG’S BAR RECURSION CLOSURE THEOREM

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAULO OLIVA ◽  
SILVIA STEILA

AbstractIn [12], Schwichtenberg showed that the System T definable functionals are closed under a rule-like version Spector’s bar recursion of lowest type levels 0 and 1. More precisely, if the functional Y which controls the stopping condition of Spector’s bar recursor is T-definable, then the corresponding bar recursion of type levels 0 and 1 is already T-definable. Schwichtenberg’s original proof, however, relies on a detour through Tait’s infinitary terms and the correspondence between ordinal recursion for $\alpha < {\varepsilon _0}$ and primitive recursion over finite types. This detour makes it hard to calculate on given concrete system T input, what the corresponding system T output would look like. In this paper we present an alternative (more direct) proof based on an explicit construction which we prove correct via a suitably defined logical relation. We show through an example how this gives a straightforward mechanism for converting bar recursive definitions into T-definitions under the conditions of Schwichtenberg’s theorem. Finally, with the explicit construction we can also easily state a sharper result: if Y is in the fragment Ti then terms built from $BR^{\mathbb{N},\sigma } $ for this particular Y are definable in the fragment ${T_{i + {\rm{max}}\left\{ {1,{\rm{level}}\left( \sigma \right)} \right\} + 2}}$.

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
TOBY MEADOWS

AbstractWe provide infinitary proof theories for three common semantic theories of truth: strong Kleene, van Fraassen supervaluation and Cantini supervaluation. The value of these systems is that they provide an easy method of proving simple facts about semantic theories. Moreover we shall show that they also give us a simpler understanding of the computational complexity of these definitions and provide a direct proof that the closure ordinal for Kripke’s definition is $\omega _1^{CK}$. This work can be understood as an effort to provide a proof-theoretic counterpart to Welch’s game-theoretic (Welch, 2009).


1949 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. W. Turnbull

The following note which deals with the effect of a certain determinantal operator when it acts upon a product of determinants was suggested by the original proof which Dr. Alfred Young gave of the propertysubsisting between the positive P and the negative N substitutional operators, θ being a positive integer. This result which establishes the idempotency of the expression θ−1NP within an appropriate algebra is fundamental in the Quantitative Substitutional Analysis that Young developed.


1965 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Bambah ◽  
Alan Woods ◽  
Hans Zassenhaus

Let K be a bounded, open convex set in euclidean n-space Rn, symmetric in the origin 0. Further let L be a lattice in Rn containing 0 and put extended over all positive real numbers ui for which uiK contains i linearly independent points of L. Denote the Jordan content of K by V(K) and the determinant of L by d(L). Minkowski's second inequality in the geometry of numbers states that Minkowski's original proof has been simplified by Weyl [6] and Cassels [7] and a different proof hasbeen given by Davenport [1].


1957 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bell

The Mathieu functions of integral order [1] are the solutions with period π or 2π of the equationThe eigenvalues associated with the functions ceN and seN, where N is a positive integer, denoted by aN and bN respectively, reduce toaN = bN = N2when q is zero. The quantities aN and bN can be expanded in powers of q, but the explicit construction of high order coefficients is very tedious. In some applications the quantity of most interest is aN – bN, which may be called the “width of the unstable zone“. It is the object of this note to derive a general formula for the leading term in the expansion of this quantity, namelySuppose first that N is an odd integer. Then there is an expansionwhereThese functions π satisfyandOn Substituting (3) in (1), one obtains the algebraic equationwhereExplicitly,{11} = q{lm} = 0 otherwise.


2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-93
Author(s):  
Marcus Tressl

The Marker-Steinhorn Theorem (cf. [2] and [3]), says the following. If T is an o-minimal theory and M ≺ N is an elementary extension of models of T such that M is Dedekind complete in N, then for every N-definable subset X of Nk, the trace X ∩ Mk is M-definable. The original proof in [2] gives an explicit method how to construct a defining formula of X ∩ Mk out of a defining formula of X. A geometric reformulation of the Marker-Steinhorn Theorem is the definability of Hausdorff limits of families of definable sets. An explicit construction of these Hausdorff limits for expansions of the real field has recently been achieved in [1]. Both proofs and also the treatment [3] are technically involved.Here we give a short algebraic, but not constructive proof, if T is an expansion of real closed fields. In fact we'll identify the statement of the Theorem with a valuation theoretic property of models of T (namely condition (†) below). Therefore our proof might be applicable to other elementary classes which expand fields, if a notion of dimension and a reasonable valuation theory are available.From now on, let T be an o-minimal expansion of real closed fields. We have to show the following (cf. [2], Th. 2.1. for this formulation). If M is a model of T and p is a tame n-type over M (i.e., M is Dedekind complete in M ⟨ᾱ⟩ := dcl(Mᾱ) for some realization ᾱ of p), then p is a definable type (cf. [4], 11 .b).


2010 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-95
Author(s):  
KA HIN LEUNG ◽  
VINH NGUYEN ◽  
WASIN SO

AbstractThe expansion constant of a simple graph G of order n is defined as where $E(S, \overline {S})$ denotes the set of edges in G between the vertex subset S and its complement $\overline {S}$. An expander family is a sequence {Gi} of d-regular graphs of increasing order such that h(Gi)>ϵ for some fixed ϵ>0. Existence of such families is known in the literature, but explicit construction is nontrivial. A folklore theorem states that there is no expander family of circulant graphs only. In this note, we provide an elementary proof of this fact by first estimating the second largest eigenvalue of a circulant graph, and then employing Cheeger’s inequalities where G is a d-regular graph and λ2(G) denotes the second largest eigenvalue of G. Moreover, the associated equality cases are discussed.


1988 ◽  
Vol 110 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 249-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Ambrosio

SynopsisGiven a set valued mapping ∑: ℝ → ∑n, we prove a closure property with respect to -convergence for the differential inclusionunder very mild assumptions on ∑.


1915 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 219-221
Author(s):  
J. E. A. Steggall

The following is a direct proof that any n + 1 particular integrals of the differential equationwhereand P1, P2 … Pn are functions of t alone, are connected by a linear relation.


1993 ◽  
Vol 19 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 201-222
Author(s):  
Pawel Urzyczyn

We consider computability over abstract structures with help of primitive recursive definitions (an appropriate modification of Gödel’s system T). Unlike the standard approach, we do not assume any fixed representation of integers, but instead we allow primitive recursion to be polymorphic, so that iteration is performed with help of counters viewed as objects of an abstract type Int of arbitrary (hidden) implementation. This approach involves the use of existential quantification in types, following the ideas of Mitchell and Plotkin. We show that the halting problem over finite interpretations is primitive recursive for each program involving primitive recursive definitions. Conversely, each primitive recursive set of interpretations is defined by the termination property of some program.


1979 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 867-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man-Duen Choi

We present an example which illustrates several peculiar phenomena that may occur in the theory of C*-algebras. In particular, we show that a C*-subalgebra of a nuclear (amenable) C*-algebra need not be nuclear (amenable).The central object of this paper is a pair of abstract unitary matrices,acting on a common Hilbert space. For an explicit construction, we may decompose an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space H into H = H0 ⴲ H1 , H1 = Hα ⴲ Hβ with dim H0 = dim H1 = dim Hα = dim Hβ, letting u, v Є B(H) be any two unitary operators such thatand u2 = 1, v3 = 1. Whereas many choices of u, v are possible, it might be surprising to see that C*(u, v), the C*-algebra generated by u and v, is algebraically unique; namely, if (u1,V1) is another pair of such unitaries, then C*(u, v) is canonically *-isomorphic with C*(u1, v1) (Theorem 2.6).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document