scholarly journals ON SUPERNILPOTENT NONSPECIAL RADICALS

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-110
Author(s):  
HALINA FRANCE-JACKSON

AbstractLet ρ be a supernilpotent radical. Let ρ* be the class of all rings A such that either A is a simple ring in ρ or the factor ring A/I is in ρ for every nonzero ideal I of A and every minimal ideal M of A is in ρ. Let $\mathcal {L}\left ( \rho ^{\ast }\right ) $ be the lower radical determined by ρ* and let ρφ denote the upper radical determined by the class of all subdirectly irreducible rings with ρ-semisimple hearts. Le Roux and Heyman proved that $\mathcal {L}\left ( \rho ^{\ast }\right ) $ is a supernilpotent radical with $\rho \subseteq \mathcal {L}\left ( \rho ^{\ast }\right ) \subseteq \rho _{\varphi }$ and they asked whether $\mathcal {L} \left ( \rho ^{\ast }\right ) =\rho _{\varphi }$ if ρ is replaced by β, ℒ , 𝒩 or 𝒥 , where β, ℒ , 𝒩 and 𝒥 denote the Baer, the Levitzki, the Koethe and the Jacobson radical, respectively. In the present paper we will give a negative answer to this question by showing that if ρ is a supernilpotent radical whose semisimple class contains a nonzero nonsimple * -ring without minimal ideals, then $\mathcal {L}\left ( \rho ^{\ast }\right ) $ is a nonspecial radical and consequently $\mathcal {L}\left ( \rho ^{\ast }\right ) \neq \rho _{\varphi }$. We recall that a prime ring A is a * -ring if A/I is in β for every $0\neq I\vartriangleleft A$.

2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 423-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
HALINA FRANCE-JACKSON

AbstractA radical α has the Amitsur property if α(A[x])=(α(A[x])∩A)[x] for all rings A. For rings R⊆S with the same unity, we call S a finite centralizing extension of R if there exist b1,b2,…,bt∈S such that S=b1R+b2R+⋯+btR and bir=rbi for all r∈R and i=1,2,…,t. A radical α is FCE-friendly if α(S)∩R⊆α(R) for any finite centralizing extension S of a ring R. We show that if α is a supernilpotent radical whose semisimple class contains the ring ℤ of all integers and α is FCE-friendly, then α has the Amitsur property. In this way the Amitsur property of many well-known radicals such as the prime radical, the Jacobson radical, the Brown–McCoy radical, the antisimple radical and the Behrens radical can be established. Moreover, applying this condition, we will show that the upper radical 𝒰(*k) generated by the essential cover *k of the class * of all *-rings has the Amitsur property and 𝒰(*k)(A[x])=𝒰(*k)(A)[x], where a semiprime ring R is called a *-ring if the factor ring R/I is prime radical for every nonzero ideal I of R. The importance of *-rings stems from the fact that a *-ring A is Jacobson semisimple if and only if A is a primitive ring.


1993 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halina France-Jackson

A ring A is prime essential if A is semiprime and every prime ideal of A has a nonzero intersection with each nonzero ideal of A. We prove that any radical (other than the Baer's lower radical) whose semisimple class contains all prime essential rings is not special. This yields non-speciality of certain known radicals and answers some open questions.


Author(s):  
Peter V. Danchev ◽  
Tsiu-Kwen Lee

Let [Formula: see text] be an associative ring. Given a positive integer [Formula: see text], for [Formula: see text] we define [Formula: see text], the [Formula: see text]-generalized commutator of [Formula: see text]. By an [Formula: see text]-generalized Lie ideal of [Formula: see text] (at the [Formula: see text]th position with [Formula: see text]) we mean an additive subgroup [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] satisfying [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text] and all [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text]. In the paper, we study [Formula: see text]-generalized commutators of rings and prove that if [Formula: see text] is a noncommutative prime ring and [Formula: see text], then every nonzero [Formula: see text]-generalized Lie ideal of [Formula: see text] contains a nonzero ideal. Therefore, if [Formula: see text] is a noncommutative simple ring, then [Formula: see text]. This extends a classical result due to Herstein [Generalized commutators in rings, Portugal. Math. 13 (1954) 137–139]. Some generalizations and related questions on [Formula: see text]-generalized commutators and their relationship with noncommutative polynomials are also discussed.


2020 ◽  
pp. 77-83
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shadab Khan ◽  
Mohd Arif Raza ◽  
Nadeemur Rehman

Let R be a prime ring, I a nonzero ideal of R, d a derivation of R and m, n fixed positive integers. (i) If (d ( r ○ s)(r ○ s) + ( r ○ s) d ( r ○ s)n - d ( r ○ s))m for all r, s ϵ I, then R is commutative. (ii) If (d ( r ○ s)( r ○ s) + ( r ○ s) d ( r ○ s)n - d (r ○ s))m ϵ Z(R) for all r, s ϵ I, then R satisfies s4, the standard identity in four variables. Moreover, we also examine the case when R is a semiprime ring.


2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Shuliang Huang ◽  
Nadeem Ur Rehman

Let $R$ be a prime ring, $I$ a nonzero ideal of $R$ and $m, n$  fixed positive integers.  If $R$ admits a generalized derivation $F$ associated with a  nonzero derivation $d$ such that $(F([x,y])^{m}=[x,y]_{n}$ for  all $x,y\in I$, then $R$ is commutative. Moreover  we also examine the case when $R$ is a semiprime ring.


1971 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Burgess ◽  
M. Chacron

AbstractTwenty-five years ago McCoy published a characterization of commutative subdirectly irreducible rings. This result was generalized by Thierrin to duo rings with the word “field” which appeared in McCoy's theorem replaced by “division ring”. The purpose of this note is to give another generalization in which the words “division ring” will be replaced by “simple ring with 1 ”. The techniques resemble those of McCoy and Thierrin.


1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Chatters ◽  
M. P. Gilchrist ◽  
D. Wilson

Let R be a ring. An element p of R is a prime element if pR = Rp is a prime ideal of R. A prime ring R is said to be a Unique Factorisation Ring if every non-zero prime ideal contains a prime element. This paper develops the basic theory of U.F.R.s. We show that every polynomial extension in central indeterminates of a U.F.R. is a U.F.R. We consider in more detail the case when a U.F.R. is either Noetherian or satisfies a polynomial identity. In particular we show that such a ring R is a maximal order, that every height-1 prime ideal of R has a classical localisation in which every two-sided ideal is principal, and that R is the intersection of a left and right Noetherian ring and a simple ring.


1971 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwangil Koh ◽  
A. C. Mewborn

If I is a right ideal of a ring R, I is said to be an annihilator right ideal provided that there is a subset S in R such thatI is said to be injective if it is injective as a submodule of the right regular R-module RR. The purpose of this note is to prove that a prime ring R (not necessarily with 1) which satisfies the ascending chain condition on annihilator right ideals is a simple ring with descending chain condition on one sided ideals if R contains a nonzero right ideal which is injective.


1956 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 355-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Amitsur

Introduction. Let R be a ring and let R[x] be the ring of all polynomials in a commutative indeterminate x over R. Let J(R) denote the Jacobson radical (5) of the ring R and let L(R) be the lower radical (4) of R. The main object of the present note is to determine the radicals J(R[x]) and L(R[x]). The Jacobson radical J(R[x]) is shown to be a polynomial ring N[x] over a nil ideal N of R and the lower radical L(R[x]) is the polynomial ring L(R)[x].


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 615-626
Author(s):  
Magdaleen S. Marais

The concept of an I-matrix in the full 2 × 2 matrix ring M2(R/I), where R is an arbitrary UFD and I is a nonzero ideal in R, is introduced. We obtain a concrete description of the centralizer of an I-matrix [Formula: see text] in M2(R/I) as the sum of two subrings 𝒮1 and 𝒮2 of M2(R/I), where 𝒮1 is the image (under the natural epimorphism from M2(R) to M2(R/I)) of the centralizer in M2(R) of a pre-image of [Formula: see text], and the entries in 𝒮2 are intersections of certain annihilators of elements arising from the entries of [Formula: see text]. It turns out that if R is a PID, then every matrix in M2(R/I) is an I-matrix. However, this is not the case if R is a UFD in general. Moreover, for every factor ring R/I with zero divisors and every n ≥ 3, there is a matrix for which the mentioned concrete description is not valid.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document