scholarly journals Increased portion size leads to a sustained increase in energy intake over 4 d in normal-weight and overweight men and women

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 470-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary T. Kelly ◽  
Julie M. W. Wallace ◽  
Paula J. Robson ◽  
Kirsten L. Rennie ◽  
Robert W. Welch ◽  
...  

Large food portions may be facilitating excess energy intake (EI) and adiposity among adults. The present study aimed to assess the extent to which EI and amounts of foods consumed are influenced by the availability of different-sized food portions. A randomised within-subject cross-over, fully residential design was used, where forty-three (twenty-one men and twenty-two women) normal-weight and overweight adults were randomly allocated to two separate 4 d periods where they were presented with either ‘standard’ or ‘large’ food portions of the same foods and beverages. The main outcome measures were the amount of food (g) and EI (MJ) consumed throughout each study period. Mean EI over 4 d was significantly higher on the large portion condition compared with the standard condition in the total group (59·1 (sd 6·6) v. 52·2 (sd 14·3) MJ; P = 0·020); men and women increased their EI by 17 % (10 (sd 6·5) MJ; P < 0·001) and 10 % (4 (sd 6·5) MJ; P = 0·005) respectively when served the large food portions relative to the standard food portions. The increased intakes were sustained over the 4 d in the large portion condition with little evidence of down-regulation of EI and food intake being made by subjects. Increased food portion size resulted in significant and sustained increases in EI in men and women over 4 d under fully residential conditions. The availability and consumption of larger portions of food may be a significant factor contributing to excess EI and adiposity.

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 1207-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J Rolls ◽  
Erin L Morris ◽  
Liane S Roe

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Stanley Burger ◽  
Susan L. Johnson

Increases in portion size lead to increases in energy intake, yet the mechanisms behind this ‘portion size effect’ are unclear. This study tested possible mechanisms of the portion size effect i.e., bite size and visual cues in 30 over- and normal-weight individuals (15 men, 15 women). A 2x2 repeated measures, within-subject design was used to test the effects of portion size (410g vs. 820g of a pasta dish) and visual cues (blindfolded vs. visible) on energy intake. At each meal participants were exposed to one of four experimental conditions (small portion/visible; small portion/blindfold; large portion/visible; large portion/blindfold). Participant characteristics, food intake, number of bites, meal duration, palatability measures and hunger and fullness were assessed. In response to a doubling of the portion presented, entrée energy intake increased 26% (220kcal P &lt; 0.001) and mean bite size increased 2.4g/bite (P &lt; 0.05). Overweight individuals consumed 40% (334kcal) more of the entrée in response to the large portion condition (P &lt; 0.05), while lean individuals’ intakes did not differ (P &lt; 0.56). A 12% (122kcal) decrease in entrée intake was observed in the blindfolded condition (P &lt; 0.01), but no portion by visual cue interaction was found; indicating that blindfolding did not attenuate the portion size effect. These data suggest that the portion size effect is greater in overweight individuals and occurs via changes in bite size.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1240-1246
Author(s):  
Kapria-Jad Josaphat ◽  
Élise Labonté-Lemoyne ◽  
Sylvain Sénécal ◽  
Pierre-Majorique Léger ◽  
Marie-Eve Mathieu

Background: Sedentariness has been shown to increase energy intake and is associated with increased obesity prevalence. Active workstations are used to implement physical activity interventions in workplaces, but it is unclear if they can lead to reductions in body weight. This study aims to observe the acute impact of a standing desk on energy intake and appetite sensations. Methods: Participants came to the laboratory, where they were randomly assigned to a seated or a standing desk. They completed a work session (∼75 min) during which they performed cognitive tasks and reported their levels of stress. Following this, they had a 15-minute break during which buffet-type snacks were served. Subjects were asked to rate their appetite sensations on visual analog scales. Results: Thirty-six normal-weight men and women aged 24.3 (4.3) years participated in this study. Energy intake from snacks was similar (P = .472) between participants who sat (427.8 [286.9] kcal) and the ones who stood (461.2 [272.8] kcal) during the work session. There was no difference in satiety quotients around the snack and no significant interaction time × condition for appetite sensations. Conclusion: The use of a standing desk for 75 minutes did not increase food consumption following a meal.


Obesity ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1362-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah B. Lewis ◽  
Amy L. Ahern ◽  
Ivonne Solis-Trapala ◽  
Celia G. Walker ◽  
Frank Reimann ◽  
...  

Appetite ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 175 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Drewnowski ◽  
J. Louis-Sylvestre ◽  
C. Massien ◽  
J. Fricker ◽  
D. Chapelot ◽  
...  

Appetite ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J Rolls ◽  
Liane S Roe ◽  
Tanja V.E Kral ◽  
Jennifer S Meengs ◽  
Denise E Wall

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document