Magnetostratigraphy of lower Cambrian strata from the Siberian Platform: a palaeomagnetic pole and a preliminary polarity time-scale

1984 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph L. Kirschvink ◽  
A. Yu. Rozanov

AbstractFour sedimentary sections seen in continuous exposures along the Lena River on the Siberian Platform in Yakutia contain a record of the geomagnetic field during the Tommotian and Atdabanian stages of Early Cambrian time. The direction of the stable remanent magnetization indicates that the Siberian platform was located on the equator, and the corresponding palaeomagnetic pole provides a well-dated extension of the Siberian apparent polar wander path. A belt of archaeocyathid bioherms which separates two major facies zones in the lower Cambrian was positioned on and aligned more or less parallel with the palaeoequator. The geographical position of this belt appears to have tracked the southward motion of the Siberian platform during post-Tommotian time. These palaeomagnetic results combined with the extensive biostratigraphy of the Siberian Platform provide a provisional geomagnetic polarity time scale for this part of Early Cambrian time. Comparison of these results with data of similar age from Central Australia suggests that strata of Tommotian and lower Atdabanian age are not present in the Amadeus Basin of Australia.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annique van der Boon ◽  
Andy Biggin ◽  
Daniele Thallner ◽  
Mark Hounslow ◽  
Jerzy Nawrocki ◽  
...  

<p>The Devonian has long been a problematic era for paleomagnetism. Devonian data are generally difficult to interpret and have complex partial or full overprints. These problems arise from paleomagnetic data obtained from both sedimentary and igneous rocks. As a result, the reconstruction of motions of tectonic plates is often troubling, as these rely on apparent polar wander paths constructed from Devonian paleomagnetic poles. Also the geomagnetic polarity time scale for this time period is poorly constrained. Paleointensity studies suggest that the field was much weaker than the field of today, and it has been hypothesised that this was accompanied by many polarity reversals (a hyperreversing field). We review studies on Devonian paleopoles, magnetostratigraphy and paleointensity. We tentatively suggest that the field during the Devonian might have been so weak and perhaps of a non-dipolar configuration, that obtaining reliable paleomagnetic data from Devonian rocks is extremely difficult.  In order to push forward the understanding of the Devonian field, we emphasise the need for studies to provide fully accessible data down to specimen level demagnetisation diagrams. Incorporating all data, no matter how complex or bad they might seem, is the only way to advance the understanding of the Devonian magnetic field. Recent paleointensity studies appear to suggest that the Devonian and Ediacaran were both extreme weak field intervals. For the Ediacaran, it has been hypothesised that the field had an impact on life on earth. A fundamentally weak and perhaps non-dipolar field during the Devonian might have had an influence on evolution and extinctions. As there is a large number of biological crises in the Devonian, we here pose the question whether the Earth’s magnetic field was a contributing factor to these crises. New independent evidence from the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary suggests that the Hangenberg event was caused by increased UV-B radiation, which is in line with a weak magnetic field.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annique van der Boon ◽  
Andy Biggin ◽  
Daniele Thallner ◽  
Mark Hounslow ◽  
Jerzy Nawrocki ◽  
...  

<p>The global polarity time scale (GPTS) is relatively unconstrained for the Paleozoic, particularly the Devonian. Constraining the GPTS and reversal frequency for the Devonian is crucial for the understanding of the behaviour of Earth’s magnetic field. Furthermore, construction of a GPTS for the Paleozoic could provide a valuable tool for age determination in other studies. However, most paleomagnetic data from the Devonian is problematic. The data are difficult to interpret and don’t have a single easy to resolve (partial or full) overprint. Paleointensity studies suggest that the field was much weaker than the field of today, which could have been accompanied by many reversals (a hyperreversing field). In order to improve the geomagnetic polarity time scale in the Devonian, and quantify the number of reversals in this time, we sampled three Devonian sections in Germany, Poland and Canada. These sections show evidence that the rocks were not significantly heated, and they show little evidence for remineralisation. This minimises the chance the rocks were remagnetised after the Devonian. Our data show that even when rocks are well qualified to have reliably recorded the Devonian field, the interpretation is not straightforward. We also discuss problems with the Devonian GPTS as presented in the geologic timescale.</p>


1983 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Bengtson ◽  
Terence P. Fletcher

Sections on the Burin Peninsula in southeastern Newfoundland show a record of continuous sedimentation during the Late Precambrian–Early Cambrian transition. These may be correlated lithologically and biostratigraphically with less complete sequences on the Avalon and Bonavista Peninsulas. Below the oldest known trilobites in southeastern Newfoundland (of the Callavia Zone) two consecutive assemblages of skeletal fossils are recognizable: an Aldanella attleborensis assemblage and the succeeding Coleoloides typicalis assemblage. The shift between the two assemblages takes place within the Bonavista Formation in the Avalon–Bonavista region and in a similar succession of mudstones near St. Lawrence on the Burin Peninsula. The quartzitic Random Formation appears to have been deposited during a short interval within the time span represented by the A. attleborensis assemblage, and there is no conclusive biostratigraphical evidence of any major diachronism of this unit. The A. attleborensis assemblage contains taxa known from the lower part of the Tommotian Stage on the Siberian Platform. It is interpreted to be of Tommotian age, and the subsequent shift to the C. typicalis assemblage is tentatively correlated with the Tommotian–Atdabanian boundary as recognized in Siberia.


2011 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Fox ◽  
Craig S. Scott

The early PaleocenePurgatoriusVan Valen and Sloan is the most primitive plesiadapiform primate yet discovered, mostly known from middle to late Puercan strata in Montana, deposited during the interval C29N of the geomagnetic polarity time scale. Here we describePurgatorius coracisn. sp. from the Ravenscrag Formation, at the Rav W-1 horizon, Medicine Hat Brick and Tile Quarry, southwestern Saskatchewan. This horizon occurs within C29R, makingP. coracisthe earliest known primate, while strengthening the evidence that plesiadapiforms, and hence primates, originated and underwent their initial evolutionary diversification in North America. Most North American mammalian local faunas correlating with C29R have been assigned to the Pul (earliest Puercan) interval zone, but the taxonomic composition of the mammals accompanyingP. coracisat Rav W-1 more resembles local faunas of Pu2 age. The occurrence at Rav W-1 of Pu2 aspect mammals within C29R agrees with similar occurrences at the Hiatt and PITA Flats localities in Montana and North Dakota, also possibly correlated with C29R. The evidence from these three sites, all in the Williston Basin, suggests that in some areas of the Western Interior Pu2 aspect local faunas were coeval with those of latest Pu1 age, having evolved earlier than has commonly been assumed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document