paleomagnetic data
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

426
(FIVE YEARS 67)

H-INDEX

45
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Wu ◽  
et al.

Figure S1: Alternative sets of mean poles. Table S1: Paleomagnetic data from Domeier (2016). Table S2–4: Alternative mean poles for Gondwana, Laurentia and Baltica.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Wu ◽  
et al.

Figure S1: Alternative sets of mean poles. Table S1: Paleomagnetic data from Domeier (2016). Table S2–4: Alternative mean poles for Gondwana, Laurentia and Baltica.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongju Wei ◽  
Fangfang Yu

The traditional method of studying plate motion still cannot be used to obtain plate motion trajectory quantitatively. In this paper, we proposed a new method to quantitative determine plate motion trajectory. Depending on the paleomagnetic data of lithosphere plate and the stereographic projection principle. We selected the Wulff net as the basic projection net, improved and transformed the traditional stereographic projection methods. Projecting the paleomagnetic data (magnetic declination, palaeolatitude and geomagnetic pole coordinate) of the lithosphere plate into the improved stereographic projection net, we can get the analysis results of lithosphere plate stereographic projection. In our study, we took the Indian plate as an example, projected the paleomagnetic data (from Cretaceous) into the stereographic projection net, got the analysis results of motion trajectory of the Indian plate from Cretaceous. This method can be applied to quantify lithospheric plate motion trajectory.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore Green ◽  
Sarah P. Slotznick ◽  
Plinio Jaqueto ◽  
Timothy D. Raub ◽  
Eric Tohver ◽  
...  

Late Devonian time was a period of rapid upheaval in the Earth system, including climate change, sea level changes, widespread ocean anoxia, and the Frasnian-Famennian mass extinction; the cause(s) of these changes remain(s) uncertain. The Lennard Shelf of the Canning Basin in Western Australia contains carbonate reef sections spanning much of the Late Devonian Epoch and has been sampled for paleomagnetic analysis with studies by Hansma and colleagues in 2015 and Playton and colleagues in 2016. However, previous paleomagnetic directions were scattered and their use for magnetostratigraphy has been questioned. Here, rock magnetic data and magnetostratigraphy for a late Devonian drill-core from the Lennard Shelf were analyzed. Three magnetostratigraphic interpretations were made using different paleopoles that showed good correlation with each other and the earlier interpretations by Playton and colleagues in 2016. Additionally, the rock magnetic data revealed the samples contain various mixtures of detrital and diagenetic minerals, the former of which should be viable recorders of primary magnetic signatures. Even in samples with these detrital phases, paleomagnetic data were often noisy and produced ambiguous polarity assignments, likely due to the anomalously weak Devonian field. Because of this ambiguity and the absence of a robust paleopole, broader correlations for this critical time-period will be difficult without additional paleomagnetic data from the late Devonian Period. Expanded data for this interval could eventually shed light on the timing, causes, and rates of the Frasnian-Famennian mass extinction and other environmental shifts in the late Devonian Epoch.


2021 ◽  

The Beaufort Formation records extraordinary details of Arctic environments and amplified temperatures at approximately modern levels of atmospheric CO2. It was deposited during the Neogene on the western side of what is now the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Meighen Island is a key locality for studying this formation because marine sediments there are interbedded with terrestrial fossiliferous sands. The biostratigraphic succession, fossils from the marine beds, and paleomagnetic data from the Bjaere Bay region of the island suggest two potential ages for the studied exposures: either continuous deposition at ca. 3.0 Ma, or a sequence of deposits at ca. 4.5 Ma and 3.4 Ma. The sediments appear to encompass at least two eustatic highstands of sea level and a particularly warm climate interval of the Pliocene Arctic.


2021 ◽  
Vol 359 ◽  
pp. 106212
Author(s):  
F.A. Temporim ◽  
U.D. Bellon ◽  
M. Domeier ◽  
R.I.F. Trindade ◽  
M.S. D'Agrella-Filho ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 360 ◽  
pp. 106243
Author(s):  
Paul Yves Jean Antonio ◽  
Ricardo Ivan Ferreira Trindade ◽  
Bruno Giacomini ◽  
Daniele Brandt ◽  
Eric Tohver

2021 ◽  
Vol 321 (6) ◽  
pp. 907-954
Author(s):  
Lydian M. Boschman ◽  
Douwe J.J. Van Hinsbergen ◽  
Cor G. Langereis ◽  
Kennet E. Flores ◽  
Peter J.J. Kamp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annique van der Boon ◽  
Andy Biggin ◽  
Daniele Thallner ◽  
Mark Hounslow ◽  
Jerzy Nawrocki ◽  
...  

<p>The Devonian has long been a problematic era for paleomagnetism. Devonian data are generally difficult to interpret and have complex partial or full overprints. These problems arise from paleomagnetic data obtained from both sedimentary and igneous rocks. As a result, the reconstruction of motions of tectonic plates is often troubling, as these rely on apparent polar wander paths constructed from Devonian paleomagnetic poles. Also the geomagnetic polarity time scale for this time period is poorly constrained. Paleointensity studies suggest that the field was much weaker than the field of today, and it has been hypothesised that this was accompanied by many polarity reversals (a hyperreversing field). We review studies on Devonian paleopoles, magnetostratigraphy and paleointensity. We tentatively suggest that the field during the Devonian might have been so weak and perhaps of a non-dipolar configuration, that obtaining reliable paleomagnetic data from Devonian rocks is extremely difficult.  In order to push forward the understanding of the Devonian field, we emphasise the need for studies to provide fully accessible data down to specimen level demagnetisation diagrams. Incorporating all data, no matter how complex or bad they might seem, is the only way to advance the understanding of the Devonian magnetic field. Recent paleointensity studies appear to suggest that the Devonian and Ediacaran were both extreme weak field intervals. For the Ediacaran, it has been hypothesised that the field had an impact on life on earth. A fundamentally weak and perhaps non-dipolar field during the Devonian might have had an influence on evolution and extinctions. As there is a large number of biological crises in the Devonian, we here pose the question whether the Earth’s magnetic field was a contributing factor to these crises. New independent evidence from the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary suggests that the Hangenberg event was caused by increased UV-B radiation, which is in line with a weak magnetic field.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document