scholarly journals Atomic Energy Commission

1947 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-102
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Security Council ◽  
Atomic Energy Commission ◽  
Atomic Energy ◽  
General Assembly ◽  
Plenary Meeting ◽  
Rules Of Procedure

By resolution adopted January 24, 1946, at the Seventeenth Plenary Meeting, the General Assembly established the Atomic Energy Commission, composed of one representative of each of the States on the Security Council, and Canada, whose reports, recommendations and rules of procedure were to be given to and approved by the Security Council, which had the additional responsibility both of issuing directives to the Commission and transmitting reports from it to other appropriate United Nations agencies.

5. Resolution of the General Assembly on the Atomic Energy Commission, Novermber 4, 1948

1949 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-211
Keyword(s):  
Security Council ◽  
Atomic Energy Commission ◽  
Atomic Energy ◽  
General Assembly ◽  
General Assembly Resolution

Having Examined the first, second and third reports of the Atomic. Energy Commission which have been transmitted to it by the Security Council in accordance with the terms of General Assembly resolution 1(1) of 24 January 1946,

The Legal Effect of Non-Compliance with Rules of Procedure in the U.N. General Assembly and Security Council

1969 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetto Conforti
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Security Council ◽  
General Assembly ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
Rules Of Procedure

Neither legal authors nor United Nations practice question the conclusion that resolutions of the General Assembly and the Security Council must conform to the U.N. Charter. Faced with a challenge to the legality of a resolution, the majority has never maintained that the acts of U.N. organs have to be complied with when they are inconsistent with the Charter. In such cases the majority has always preferred to deny that a violation of the Charter occurred, often resorting to a liberal, sometimes excessively liberal, interpretation of the provisions of the Charter.

scholarly journals Experiences from the "National Model United Nations" 2001

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 25-26
Author(s):  
Andrea Theocharis
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Security Council ◽  
General Assembly ◽  
Realistic Simulation ◽  
The World ◽  
Rules Of Procedure ◽  
National Model ◽  
The United Nations

The National Model United Nations claims to be the most realistic simulation of the United Nations in the world. Every year more than 2500 students participate in the NMUN in New York, which partly takes place inside the original UNbuildings. For five days, the students simulate the different bodies of the UN-framework (e.g. Security Council, General Assembly, ECOSOC) by using the original UN-Rules of procedure and negotiating to formulate and pass resolutions on various topics.

3. Resolution of the Security Council Concerning the Implementation of the Resolutions of the General Assembly Regarding the Principles Governing the General Regulation and Reduction of Armaments and Information on Armed Forces of the United Nations, February 13, 1947.

1947 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-410
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Security Council ◽  
Atomic Energy Commission ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
General Assembly ◽  
International Peace ◽  
Peace And Security ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
The One ◽  
General Regulation

The Security Council, having accepted the resolution of the General Assembly of 14 December 1946 and recognizing that the general regulation and reduction of irmaments and armed forces constitute a most important measure for strengthening international peace and security, and that the implementationof the resolution of the General Assembly on this subject is one of the most urgent and important tasks before the Security Council,RESOLVES:1. to work out the practical measures for giving effect to the resolutions of the General Assembly on 14 December 1946 concerning, on the one hand, the general regulation and reduction of armaments and armed forces, and the establishment of international control to bring about the reduction of armaments and armed forces and, on the other hand, information concerning the armed forces of the United Nations;2. to consider as soon as possible the report submitted by the Atomic Energy Commission and to take suitable decisions in order to facilitate its work;

1. Third Report of the Atomic Energy Commission to the Security Council, May 17, 1948

1948 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 564-567
Keyword(s):  
Security Council ◽  
Atomic Energy Commission ◽  
Atomic Energy ◽  
General Assembly

The Atomic Energy Commission reports that it has reached an impasse.In almost two years of work, the Commission has accomplished much and has succeeded in making clear the essentials of a plan for the control of atomic energy, in fulfillment of the objectives of the resolution of the General Assembly of 24 January 1946.2 Nevertheless, it considers that it cannot now prepare a draft treaty “incorporating its ultimate proposals” as urged by the resolution3 of the Security Council of 10 March 1947.

General Assembly Resolutions on the Problem of Voting in the Security Council and on Pacific Settlement of Disputes

1949 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 705-715
Author(s):  
Yuen-li Liang
Keyword(s):  
International Cooperation ◽  
Security Council ◽  
Present Note ◽  
General Assembly ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Field ◽  
Rules Of Procedure ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes

In continuation of the note on “Some Aspects of the Work of the Interim Committee of the General Assembly,” the present note will deal with the five resolutions adopted by the General Assembly during the second part of its third session, held between April 5 and May 19, 1949, on the problem of voting in the Security Council and on the study of methods for the promotion of international coöperation in the political field. These resolutions, which were adopted upon the recommendation of the Interim Committee, concern (1) the problem of voting in the Security Council; (2) restoration to the General Act of September 26, 1928, of its original efficacy; (3) appointment of a rapporteur or conciliator for a situation or dispute brought to the attention of the Security Council; (4) amendments to the rules of procedure of the General Assembly; and (5) creation of a panel for inquiry and conciliation.

Chinese Representation in the United Nations

1952 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert W. Briggs
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Security Council ◽  
National Government ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
General Assembly ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
Enforcement Action ◽  
The Mainland Of China ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
The Republic

The state of China — a nation of possibly 460,000,000 people — has been a Member of the United Nations since the foundation of that organization in 1945. As a Member, China is legally entitled to representation in United Nations organs unless and until, pursuant to preventive or enforcement action taken by the Security Council, the exercise of the rights and privileges of membership may be suspended by the General Assembly upon recommendation of the Security Council. The representatives of China in United Nations organs from 1945 to the present have been accredited by the National Government of the Republic of China. By the end of 1949 control over the mainland of China and over perhaps 450,000,000 people had passed from the National Government to the (communist) “Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China,” the effective control of the National Government having been reduced largely to the island of Formosa.

The Rôle of the General Assembly of the United Nations in the Admission of Members

1949 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Stuart Klooz
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Security Council ◽  
General Assembly ◽  
The Third ◽  
The United Nations

The effort of the delegate from Argentina to press the admission of certain states into the United Nations despite the negative vote of one of the five permanent members of the Security Council was denounced by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Poland, Belgium, Pakistan, The Netherlands, and France as being contrary to the provisions of the Charter in the discussion on the adoption of the agenda during the Third Session of the General Assembly. These states held that even discussion of such an item by the Assembly was illegal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document